U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1011606 France 11/26/2012 03:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 27749847 United States 11/26/2012 08:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 I'm simply plugging the holes in my old posts from where GLP Video went poof. Don't like it? Too bad. I notice you have nothing to say about what this video shows from 9 minutes on: [link to www.twitch.tv] And once more, the moon in 1971: [link to apollomissionphotos.com] Whoops, the OP is dead wrong! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28499049 South Korea 11/26/2012 09:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 I'm simply plugging the holes in my old posts from where GLP Video went poof. Don't like it? Too bad. I notice you have nothing to say about what this video shows from 9 minutes on: [link to www.twitch.tv] And once more, the moon in 1971: [link to apollomissionphotos.com] Whoops, the OP is dead wrong! So you have a Right-facing Moon Face, don't suppose you care to see it tonight. It's Left facing now tonight where I am. (Psst! Guess what? You're debunking, or trying to anyway.) |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 27749847 United States 11/26/2012 09:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 I'm simply plugging the holes in my old posts from where GLP Video went poof. Don't like it? Too bad. I notice you have nothing to say about what this video shows from 9 minutes on: [link to www.twitch.tv] And once more, the moon in 1971: [link to apollomissionphotos.com] Whoops, the OP is dead wrong! So you have a Right-facing Moon Face, don't suppose you care to see it tonight. It's Left facing now tonight where I am. (Psst! Guess what? You're debunking, or trying to anyway.) I'm not debunking anything new, I'm restoring information lost due to the loss of glp video. (Psst, the illuminated side of the moon depends on its phase and is a completely different matter. Try actually watching the video for more than 30 seconds). Last Edited by Astromut on 11/26/2012 09:21 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28499049 South Korea 11/26/2012 09:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 I'm simply plugging the holes in my old posts from where GLP Video went poof. Don't like it? Too bad. I notice you have nothing to say about what this video shows from 9 minutes on: [link to www.twitch.tv] And once more, the moon in 1971: [link to apollomissionphotos.com] Whoops, the OP is dead wrong! So you have a Right-facing Moon Face, don't suppose you care to see it tonight. It's Left facing now tonight where I am. (Psst! Guess what? You're debunking, or trying to anyway.) I'm not debunking anything new, I'm restoring information lost due to the loss of glp video. (Psst, the illuminated side of the moon depends on its phase and is a completely different matter. Try actually watching the video for more than 30 seconds). You're so FOS! How many sides of the Moon do we Today get illuminated? |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 2240357 United States 11/26/2012 09:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 ... Quoting: Dr. Astro I'm simply plugging the holes in my old posts from where GLP Video went poof. Don't like it? Too bad. I notice you have nothing to say about what this video shows from 9 minutes on: [link to www.twitch.tv] And once more, the moon in 1971: [link to apollomissionphotos.com] Whoops, the OP is dead wrong! So you have a Right-facing Moon Face, don't suppose you care to see it tonight. It's Left facing now tonight where I am. (Psst! Guess what? You're debunking, or trying to anyway.) I'm not debunking anything new, I'm restoring information lost due to the loss of glp video. (Psst, the illuminated side of the moon depends on its phase and is a completely different matter. Try actually watching the video for more than 30 seconds). You're so FOS! How many sides of the Moon do we Today get illuminated? Learn to speak English, your question is unclear. And for fuck's sake, get a real account so I can answer your questions by pm. You don't even know how moon phases work. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28499049 South Korea 11/26/2012 09:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28499049 So you have a Right-facing Moon Face, don't suppose you care to see it tonight. It's Left facing now tonight where I am. (Psst! Guess what? You're debunking, or trying to anyway.) I'm not debunking anything new, I'm restoring information lost due to the loss of glp video. (Psst, the illuminated side of the moon depends on its phase and is a completely different matter. Try actually watching the video for more than 30 seconds). You're so FOS! How many sides of the Moon do we Today get illuminated? Learn to speak English, your question is unclear. And for fuck's sake, get a real account so I can answer your questions by pm. You don't even know how moon phases work. At :40-45 [link to www.youtube.com] |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 11/26/2012 10:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 ... Quoting: Dr. Astro I'm not debunking anything new, I'm restoring information lost due to the loss of glp video. (Psst, the illuminated side of the moon depends on its phase and is a completely different matter. Try actually watching the video for more than 30 seconds). You're so FOS! How many sides of the Moon do we Today get illuminated? Learn to speak English, your question is unclear. And for fuck's sake, get a real account so I can answer your questions by pm. You don't even know how moon phases work. At :40-45 [link to www.youtube.com] Cute. I get it now, you're trying to distract from my previous post since I debunked the "U-moon" nonsense above. Debunked it ages ago as well, but with my new video in place it's once again debunked on this thread. Last Edited by Astromut on 11/26/2012 10:15 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28499049 South Korea 11/26/2012 10:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28499049 You're so FOS! How many sides of the Moon do we Today get illuminated? Learn to speak English, your question is unclear. And for fuck's sake, get a real account so I can answer your questions by pm. You don't even know how moon phases work. At :40-45 [link to www.youtube.com] Cute. I get it now, you're trying to distract from my previous post since I debunked the "U-moon" nonsense above. Debunked it ages ago as well, but with my new video in place it's once again debunked on this thread. I'm not familiar with the ins and outs of this particular thread, nor your participation in such. But I'm sure you did your Best in your debunkerish pursuits. |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 11/26/2012 10:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 Bump for the OP to respond. Quoting: Menow 18943200 Do you even finally understand that the Moon's phases are not caused by Earth's shadow? Thanks for the bump Menow...lets get back to the subject> Why is there a laying Moon on our skies in the past years, and why NASA does not seem to notice it? There are questions and points of discussion standing, unanswered, to you just above. Are you just going to ignore them? Sure I do, as you are trying to derail the conversation. You were citing a vid- You called my attention to it. There are explanations in response to that vid. I'm asking you to STAY with the conversation about the vid YOU posted. How is that "derailing" the conversation? |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 11/26/2012 12:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 Well isn't the moon supposed to have the crescent vertical? Quoting: ~Spaze*Man~ Not horizontal from top to bottom. It looks different to me. No, it isn't supposed to always be that way. Get a clue. Maybe not, but this tilt is unusual. When you look at it, it's like your intuition tells you something is...off. "Unusual", in that it's not ALWAYS a certain way? Well, yes, but "unusual" in that it is not SUPPOSED to ever be that way? Not at all. A "U" moon is not a sign that there is something wrong with the orbits of Earth or Moon or Sun. It is a NORMAL orientation of the moon in the sky. There are apparently a number of people who's "intuition" is pretty faulty. |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 11/26/2012 12:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 Bump for the OP to respond. Quoting: Menow 18943200 Do you even finally understand that the Moon's phases are not caused by Earth's shadow? Thanks for the bump Menow...lets get back to the subject> Why is there a laying Moon on our skies in the past years, and why NASA does not seem to notice it? There are questions and points of discussion standing, unanswered, to you just above. Are you just going to ignore them? Sure I do, as you are trying to derail the conversation. What you are worried about "derailing" is your CONCLUSION that something is wrong with the way the moon is appearing. That CONCLUSION is erroneous, as is your CONCLUSION about what the vid you cited shows. There are questions and points of discussion before you. We await your responses on them. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23651021 United States 11/26/2012 12:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 ... Quoting: Dr. Astro I'm simply plugging the holes in my old posts from where GLP Video went poof. Don't like it? Too bad. I notice you have nothing to say about what this video shows from 9 minutes on: [link to www.twitch.tv] And once more, the moon in 1971: [link to apollomissionphotos.com] Whoops, the OP is dead wrong! So you have a Right-facing Moon Face, don't suppose you care to see it tonight. It's Left facing now tonight where I am. (Psst! Guess what? You're debunking, or trying to anyway.) I'm not debunking anything new, I'm restoring information lost due to the loss of glp video. (Psst, the illuminated side of the moon depends on its phase and is a completely different matter. Try actually watching the video for more than 30 seconds). You're so FOS! How many sides of the Moon do we Today get illuminated? Once again Astromut has made you look like a complete FOOL, lol.... |
emerald_glow (OP) User ID: 924761 United States 11/28/2012 03:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 Well as I already proved, field rotation is why the moon looked like a "u," not libration. Thanks for agreeing with me. You are very welcome, Mr Astro:-) Ok lets call it field rotation. I think the terms are not important: Terminology IS important. Field rotation is not libration. Libration is a minor effect compared to field rotation, and has a much longer periodicity than field rotation. we are looking at the vid, Quoting: EmeraldWhat part of your video shows libration, not field rotation did you not understand? What part of field rotation depends on observer position did you not understand? Which part of they only showed libration did you not understand? It's impossible for the video to show what the moon's apparent orientation will look like from your specific location from a non-polar aligned perspective; that depends on your location and varies from person to person. P.S. I checked your link, but no Moon vids from last week. Quoting: EmeraldBullshit, the link takes you straight to the relevant video. Everyone, watch this from 9 minutes on: [link to www.twitch.tv] Dr. Astro, 1. you claim above , that "field rotation is why the moon looked like a "u," not libration" I found the definition of field rotation, and it says: "Field rotation is the apparent rotation of a celestial object in the field of view of a telescope during the course of the night. All objects in the eyepiece field or on the camera’s image will move in arcs. It’s usually either ignored or not noticed for visual observations, but cannot be ignored for photography." [link to www.celestron.com] That is FIELD ROTATION refers to viewing an object in a TELESCOPE. Our observations of the U-MOON made directly, with naked eyes, no telescope. The animation, that we compare our observations to also simulates a naked eye observation. That concludes you cannot explain the U-Moon by Field Rotation. 2. I watched your video, but your verbal notes offered no explanation HOW the field rotation effects the phenomenon we are talking about. Last Edited by emerald_glow on 11/28/2012 03:31 PM Emerald_Glow |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 11/28/2012 03:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 Dr. Astro, Quoting: emerald_glow 1. you claim above , that "field rotation is why the moon looked like a "u," not libration" I found the definition of field rotation, and it says: "Field rotation is the apparent rotation of a celestial object in the field of view of a telescope during the course of the night. All objects in the eyepiece field or on the camera’s image will move in arcs. It’s usually either ignored or not noticed for visual observations, but cannot be ignored for photography." That is FIELD ROTATION refers to viewing an object in a TELESCOPE. Wrong. You do not understand field rotation. Field rotation occurs in ANY non-polar aligned perspective, whether with a telescope or not. A telescope does not magically cause field rotation to appear, but a polar aligned telescope can eliminate field rotation as I already proved above. And as I already prove above, a telescope in not necessary to witness field rotation; the field rotated view was from a standard camcorder on a standard camera tripod, not a telescope. Our observations of the U-MOON made directly, with nekd eyes, no telescope. Quoting: emeraldAnd will therefore be subject to field rotation; you are not viewing from a polar aligned perspective. The animation, that we compare our observations to also simulates a naked eye observation. Quoting: emeraldNo, it does not. It simulates the effect of phases and libration, that's it, it does not take into account field rotation since that depends on your location on the ground. It's impossible to simulate it simultaneously for everyone. That concludes you cannot explain the U-Moon by Field Rotation. Quoting: emeraldYes, I can, and I already did. 2. I watched your video, but your verbal notes offered no explanation HOW the field rotation effects the phenomenon we are talking about. Quoting: emeraldI explained it clearly. Clearly you do not understand field rotation since you think it requires a telescope. Field rotation causes the apparent "u-moon" phenomenon. I showed it back to back both from your normal non-polar aligned "naked eye" perspective, and from a polar aligned perspective sans field rotation. It doesn't get any clearer than that. |
emerald_glow (OP) User ID: 924761 United States 11/28/2012 04:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 For the naked eye this movement is too slow to notice. When observing an object with naked eye, we simply follow that tiny movement with turning our head. No matter how I hard try to agree with Mr Astro, I just cannot find any connection... Emerald_Glow |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 11/28/2012 04:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 On layman's terms field rotation is the virtual rotating movement of the whole sky, due to Earth's rotation. Quoting: emerald_glow For the naked eye this movement is too slow to notice. Then I guess you never watched a sunrise or sunset. Diurnal rotation, which is what you just described, can be noticed in short time intervals by naked eye observations with an appropriate fixed reference point. Furthermore, observing the moon by naked eye when it is rising or setting will show a noticeable amount of field rotation from non-polar locations compared to its orientation at the meridian (what would generally be considered the "normal" view by most laymen). When observing an object with naked eye, we simply follow that tiny movement with turning our head. Quoting: emeraldWhich is an altitude-azimuth perspective, and is therefore subject to field rotation. It's the same for all non-polar aligned perspectives, including those of the siderostat and heliostat. [link to adsabs.harvard.edu] The only difference between that and a naked eye field rotation is that it is the diurnal rotation of the apparent field of the eye, rather than the optical field of an instrument. There is no substantive difference in the outcome, which is a moon showing an apparent rotation which you characterized as a "U - moon" and "laid back" crescent, which as I already showed above, is due to field rotation and is eliminated in a simultaneous polar aligned view. No matter how I hard try to agree with Mr Astro, I just cannot find any connection... Quoting: emeraldThat's Dr. Astro to you. I cannot know for certain whether you're incapable of understanding field rotation, or if you simply refuse to understand it because you would have to admit that there was nothing odd about the apparent orientation of the moon. In any case it doesn't really matter, I'm not trying to convince you, I've already long since written you off. It is entertaining to see your responses though. |
emerald_glow (OP) User ID: 924761 United States 11/28/2012 09:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 On layman's terms field rotation is the virtual rotating movement of the whole sky, due to Earth's rotation. Quoting: emerald_glow For the naked eye this movement is too slow to notice. Then I guess you never watched a sunrise or sunset. Diurnal rotation, which is what you just described, can be noticed in short time intervals by naked eye observations with an appropriate fixed reference point. Furthermore, observing the moon by naked eye when it is rising or setting will show a noticeable amount of field rotation from non-polar locations compared to its orientation at the meridian (what would generally be considered the "normal" view by most laymen). When observing an object with naked eye, we simply follow that tiny movement with turning our head. Quoting: emeraldWhich is an altitude-azimuth perspective, and is therefore subject to field rotation. It's the same for all non-polar aligned perspectives, including those of the siderostat and heliostat. [link to adsabs.harvard.edu] The only difference between that and a naked eye field rotation is that it is the diurnal rotation of the apparent field of the eye, rather than the optical field of an instrument. There is no substantive difference in the outcome, which is a moon showing an apparent rotation which you characterized as a "U - moon" and "laid back" crescent, which as I already showed above, is due to field rotation and is eliminated in a simultaneous polar aligned view. No matter how I hard try to agree with Mr Astro, I just cannot find any connection... Quoting: emeraldThat's Dr. Astro to you. I cannot know for certain whether you're incapable of understanding field rotation, or if you simply refuse to understand it because you would have to admit that there was nothing odd about the apparent orientation of the moon. In any case it doesn't really matter, I'm not trying to convince you, I've already long since written you off. It is entertaining to see your responses though. You entertain me, too, Mr Astro:-) Emerald_Glow |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 11/28/2012 09:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25480060 South Korea 11/29/2012 10:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 On layman's terms field rotation is the virtual rotating movement of the whole sky, due to Earth's rotation. Quoting: emerald_glow For the naked eye this movement is too slow to notice. Then I guess you never watched a sunrise or sunset. Diurnal rotation, which is what you just described, can be noticed in short time intervals by naked eye observations with an appropriate fixed reference point. Furthermore, observing the moon by naked eye when it is rising or setting will show a noticeable amount of field rotation from non-polar locations compared to its orientation at the meridian (what would generally be considered the "normal" view by most laymen). When observing an object with naked eye, we simply follow that tiny movement with turning our head. Quoting: emeraldWhich is an altitude-azimuth perspective, and is therefore subject to field rotation. It's the same for all non-polar aligned perspectives, including those of the siderostat and heliostat. [link to adsabs.harvard.edu] The only difference between that and a naked eye field rotation is that it is the diurnal rotation of the apparent field of the eye, rather than the optical field of an instrument. There is no substantive difference in the outcome, which is a moon showing an apparent rotation which you characterized as a "U - moon" and "laid back" crescent, which as I already showed above, is due to field rotation and is eliminated in a simultaneous polar aligned view. No matter how I hard try to agree with Mr Astro, I just cannot find any connection... Quoting: emeraldThat's Dr. Astro to you. I cannot know for certain whether you're incapable of understanding field rotation, or if you simply refuse to understand it because you would have to admit that there was nothing odd about the apparent orientation of the moon. In any case it doesn't really matter, I'm not trying to convince you, I've already long since written you off. It is entertaining to see your responses though. That's probably the biggest bunch of bunk I've ever read in my whole entire life, and that's saying quite a lot, because we're fed so much during our courses, of which you seem to play a substantial part here on this site! So many things to say. Where should I begin? Well, for one thing, field rotation is flawed in your understanding and application because there's a fundamental difference in applying its concept to stars out there which are not at all fixed in orbit to Earth like the moon is. duh! (If you can't understand this easy enough concept, I can try to explain this better to you subsequently.) Another thing is that I watched the moon during the whole entire night not a few weeks ago, and at no point did the moon have a different orientation at near the horizon as it did at its highest point in the sky. Theories are only as good as when they can stand under the scrutiny of real observation. And as such, yours Fails. What's that saying, if you can't wow them with something, dumbfound them with BS? I could probably remember the exact saying, but my brain I think has been reduced a few 10 or 20 points just from reading your post! Still, it's great to see you back in your full verbose but utterly lacking any real understanding ways. Welcome Back jack. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 11/29/2012 10:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 That's probably the biggest bunch of bunk I've ever read in my whole entire life, and that's saying quite a lot, because we're fed so much during our courses, of which you seem to play a substantial part here on this site! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25480060 You are probably the most ignorant poster here, or you're just the biggest troll here, so it's not surprising it went completely over your head. So many things to say. Where should I begin? Well, for one thing, field rotation is flawed in your understanding and application because there's a fundamental difference in applying its concept to stars out there which are not at all fixed in orbit to Earth like the moon is. duh! Quoting: ACField rotation happens regardless of whether the object is orbiting earth or not. Yes, it even happens with ISS: The moon orbits the earth at a much slower rate than ISS and the effect of its orbital motion on the rate of field rotation is minor. That's why you can track the moon at a sidereal rate and although it will gradually drift out of the field of view, the rate that it will do so is quite slow (I was tracking at the sidereal rate in the video of the moon I linked to in my previous post). There is no fundamental difference; the moon will still rise and set like the stars, it just takes slightly longer than the stars do as it slowly orbits from west to east. Another thing is that I watched the moon during the whole entire night not a few weeks ago, and at no point did the moon have a different orientation at near the horizon as it did at its highest point in the sky. Quoting: ACEither you're terrible at observing or you're lying. Either way, your claim fails, I've already proven what I said. Theories are only as good as when they can stand under the scrutiny of real observation. And as such, yours Fails. Quoting: ACWrong. [link to www.twitch.tv] Real, empirical evidence proves me right and shows your claim to be wrong. Where's your evidence? Oh right, you don't have any, just your word which is worth absolutely shit. Still, it's great to see you back in your full verbose but utterly lacking any real understanding ways. Quoting: ACLOL! You wouldn't understand this shit if I strapped you to a chair and gave you a personal one on one lecture. Thank you for showing to everyone how piss poor your understanding of field rotation is. It's fundamentally different for the moon because the moon orbits earth? LMFAO! You're hilarious! It's truly incredible how idiotic you are. I'm not here to change your mind either, I'm here to laugh at your staggering stupidity and hopefully draw my haters out of the woodwork for a little trap... Thank you, you provide endless entertainment, and watching you step in it again is priceless. Yeah, sure, orbiting objects magically don't exhibit field rotation... Classic kook nutjob nonsense! Last Edited by Astromut on 11/29/2012 10:49 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25480060 South Korea 11/29/2012 10:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 That's probably the biggest bunch of bunk I've ever read in my whole entire life, and that's saying quite a lot, because we're fed so much during our courses, of which you seem to play a substantial part here on this site! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25480060 You are probably the most ignorant poster here, or you're just the biggest troll here, so it's not surprising it went completely over your head. So many things to say. Where should I begin? Well, for one thing, field rotation is flawed in your understanding and application because there's a fundamental difference in applying its concept to stars out there which are not at all fixed in orbit to Earth like the moon is. duh! Quoting: ACField rotation happens regardless of whether the object is orbiting earth or not. Yes, it even happens with ISS: The moon orbits the earth at a much slower rate than ISS and the effect of its orbital motion on the rate of field rotation is minor. That's why you can track the moon at a sidereal rate and although it will gradually drift out of the field of view, the rate that it will do so is quite slow (I was tracking at the sidereal rate in the video of the moon I linked to in my previous post). There is no fundamental difference; the moon will still rise and set like the stars, it just takes slightly longer than the stars do as it slowly orbits from west to east. Another thing is that I watched the moon during the whole entire night not a few weeks ago, and at no point did the moon have a different orientation at near the horizon as it did at its highest point in the sky. Quoting: ACEither you're terrible at observing or you're lying. Either way, your claim fails, I've already proven what I said. Theories are only as good as when they can stand under the scrutiny of real observation. And as such, yours Fails. Quoting: ACWrong. [link to www.twitch.tv] Real, empirical evidence proves me right and shows your claim to be wrong. Where's your evidence? Oh right, you don't have any, just your word which is worth absolutely shit. Still, it's great to see you back in your full verbose but utterly lacking any real understanding ways. Quoting: ACLOL! You wouldn't understand this shit if I strapped you to a chair and gave you a personal one on one lecture. Thank you for showing to everyone how piss poor your understanding of field rotation is. It's fundamentally different for the moon because the moon orbits earth? LMFAO! You're hilarious! It's truly incredible how idiotic you are. I'm not here to change your mind either, I'm here to laugh at your staggering stupidity and hopefully draw my haters out of the woodwork for a little trap... Thank you, you provide endless entertainment, and watching you step in it again is priceless. Yeah, sure, orbiting objects magically don't exhibit field rotation... Classic kook nutjob nonsense! haha ahhh...how easy it is to irk the irksome with Truth! Just gets under your skin that we don't just swallow your BullSHIT like any good ole doctor would prescribe us, huh? And are you a Doctor? Not in the slightest. How much then do we take your verbosity? yes, with less than a smidgen that we would put a grain of sand into our meal. The ISS DOES NOT HAVE THE SAME ORBITAL PATTERNS OF THE MOON! I caps'ed that so you wouldn't miss it, but you probably will in any case. And does your Eye have a video recorder attached to it? What's that? No? Oh, your telescope picked that up, did it? Great. No one's lying on here, but you Astro. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 11/29/2012 11:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 Yes, I am. The number of things you're wrong about grows... The ISS DOES NOT HAVE THE SAME ORBITAL PATTERNS OF THE MOON! Quoting: ACRight, it orbits closer and faster, making it behave far less like normal stars. The moon orbits much farther away and much slower, so as far as field rotation goes it behaves just like the stars. Both, however, experience field rotation from rising to setting. I caps'ed that so you wouldn't miss it, Quoting: ACYou keep shooting yourself in the foot but you don't even realize it. Your stupidity knows no bounds. And does your Eye have a video recorder attached to it? What's that? No? Oh, your telescope picked that up, did it? Great. Quoting: ACWhich? ISS or the moon? ISS I shot with the telescope, but if you could see it by eye with that kind of resolution that's exactly what you'd see. The moon I also shot with a standard camcorder on a standard camera tripod, showing what you see by eye. I saw the moon by eye that night the same way the camcorder showed it. It's just a standard altitude-azimuth view, the same view I just showed of ISS which was shot from an altitude-azimuth perspective. No one's lying on here, but you Astro. Quoting: ACWrong. I have not only stated the truth, but I proved it as well. Keep up your defamatory remarks, by all means, it really shows everyone what you really are (and it ain't a truth teller). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25480060 South Korea 11/29/2012 11:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 Yes, I am. The number of things you're wrong about grows... The ISS DOES NOT HAVE THE SAME ORBITAL PATTERNS OF THE MOON! Quoting: ACRight, it orbits closer and faster, making it behave far less like normal stars. The moon orbits much farther away and much slower, so as far as field rotation goes it behaves just like the stars. Both, however, experience field rotation from rising to setting. I caps'ed that so you wouldn't miss it, Quoting: ACYou keep shooting yourself in the foot but you don't even realize it. Your stupidity knows no bounds. And does your Eye have a video recorder attached to it? What's that? No? Oh, your telescope picked that up, did it? Great. Quoting: ACWhich? ISS or the moon? ISS I shot with the telescope, but if you could see it by eye with that kind of resolution that's exactly what you'd see. The moon I also shot with a standard camcorder on a standard camera tripod, showing what you see by eye. I saw the moon by eye that night the same way the camcorder showed it. It's just a standard altitude-azimuth view, the same view I just showed of ISS which was shot from an altitude-azimuth perspective. No one's lying on here, but you Astro. Quoting: ACWrong. I have not only stated the truth, but I proved it as well. Keep up your defamatory remarks, by all means, it really shows everyone what you really are (and it ain't a truth teller). Yeah, you're defeated, it comes across in your tone. First you were highly belligerent which is a testament to someone who furiously tries to reinstate himself. Now you know you don't have a wooden Ahab or Long John Silver leg to stand on, so you admit defeat in your tone, regardless of how you tried to hide it with your words. I'm good like that. So i'll take pity on you in your Defeat. Because also, well, you didn't say anything of anything there really. Once again, Trumped by Truth, not by Bullshit. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 11/29/2012 11:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 Yes, I am. The number of things you're wrong about grows... The ISS DOES NOT HAVE THE SAME ORBITAL PATTERNS OF THE MOON! Quoting: ACRight, it orbits closer and faster, making it behave far less like normal stars. The moon orbits much farther away and much slower, so as far as field rotation goes it behaves just like the stars. Both, however, experience field rotation from rising to setting. I caps'ed that so you wouldn't miss it, Quoting: ACYou keep shooting yourself in the foot but you don't even realize it. Your stupidity knows no bounds. And does your Eye have a video recorder attached to it? What's that? No? Oh, your telescope picked that up, did it? Great. Quoting: ACWhich? ISS or the moon? ISS I shot with the telescope, but if you could see it by eye with that kind of resolution that's exactly what you'd see. The moon I also shot with a standard camcorder on a standard camera tripod, showing what you see by eye. I saw the moon by eye that night the same way the camcorder showed it. It's just a standard altitude-azimuth view, the same view I just showed of ISS which was shot from an altitude-azimuth perspective. No one's lying on here, but you Astro. Quoting: ACWrong. I have not only stated the truth, but I proved it as well. Keep up your defamatory remarks, by all means, it really shows everyone what you really are (and it ain't a truth teller). Yeah, you're defeated, blah blah blah Wow, you wrote an entire paragraph and not once did you say anything of substance. You did, however, fulfill Danth's law. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 11/29/2012 11:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 Yes, I am. The number of things you're wrong about grows... The ISS DOES NOT HAVE THE SAME ORBITAL PATTERNS OF THE MOON! Quoting: ACRight, it orbits closer and faster, making it behave far less like normal stars. The moon orbits much farther away and much slower, so as far as field rotation goes it behaves just like the stars. Both, however, experience field rotation from rising to setting. I caps'ed that so you wouldn't miss it, Quoting: ACYou keep shooting yourself in the foot but you don't even realize it. Your stupidity knows no bounds. And does your Eye have a video recorder attached to it? What's that? No? Oh, your telescope picked that up, did it? Great. Quoting: ACWhich? ISS or the moon? ISS I shot with the telescope, but if you could see it by eye with that kind of resolution that's exactly what you'd see. The moon I also shot with a standard camcorder on a standard camera tripod, showing what you see by eye. I saw the moon by eye that night the same way the camcorder showed it. It's just a standard altitude-azimuth view, the same view I just showed of ISS which was shot from an altitude-azimuth perspective. No one's lying on here, but you Astro. Quoting: ACWrong. I have not only stated the truth, but I proved it as well. Keep up your defamatory remarks, by all means, it really shows everyone what you really are (and it ain't a truth teller). No substantive rebuttal offered. Noted. Thanks for the help AC! This information will be quite useful to the project... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25480060 South Korea 11/29/2012 11:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 Yes, I am. The number of things you're wrong about grows... The ISS DOES NOT HAVE THE SAME ORBITAL PATTERNS OF THE MOON! Quoting: ACRight, it orbits closer and faster, making it behave far less like normal stars. The moon orbits much farther away and much slower, so as far as field rotation goes it behaves just like the stars. Both, however, experience field rotation from rising to setting. I caps'ed that so you wouldn't miss it, Quoting: ACYou keep shooting yourself in the foot but you don't even realize it. Your stupidity knows no bounds. And does your Eye have a video recorder attached to it? What's that? No? Oh, your telescope picked that up, did it? Great. Quoting: ACWhich? ISS or the moon? ISS I shot with the telescope, but if you could see it by eye with that kind of resolution that's exactly what you'd see. The moon I also shot with a standard camcorder on a standard camera tripod, showing what you see by eye. I saw the moon by eye that night the same way the camcorder showed it. It's just a standard altitude-azimuth view, the same view I just showed of ISS which was shot from an altitude-azimuth perspective. No one's lying on here, but you Astro. Quoting: ACWrong. I have not only stated the truth, but I proved it as well. Keep up your defamatory remarks, by all means, it really shows everyone what you really are (and it ain't a truth teller). Yeah, you're defeated, blah blah blah Wow, you wrote an entire paragraph and not once did you say anything of substance. You did, however, fulfill Danth's law. Don't be such a sore loser! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25480060 South Korea 11/29/2012 11:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 Yes, I am. The number of things you're wrong about grows... The ISS DOES NOT HAVE THE SAME ORBITAL PATTERNS OF THE MOON! Quoting: ACRight, it orbits closer and faster, making it behave far less like normal stars. The moon orbits much farther away and much slower, so as far as field rotation goes it behaves just like the stars. Both, however, experience field rotation from rising to setting. I caps'ed that so you wouldn't miss it, Quoting: ACYou keep shooting yourself in the foot but you don't even realize it. Your stupidity knows no bounds. And does your Eye have a video recorder attached to it? What's that? No? Oh, your telescope picked that up, did it? Great. Quoting: ACWhich? ISS or the moon? ISS I shot with the telescope, but if you could see it by eye with that kind of resolution that's exactly what you'd see. The moon I also shot with a standard camcorder on a standard camera tripod, showing what you see by eye. I saw the moon by eye that night the same way the camcorder showed it. It's just a standard altitude-azimuth view, the same view I just showed of ISS which was shot from an altitude-azimuth perspective. No one's lying on here, but you Astro. Quoting: ACWrong. I have not only stated the truth, but I proved it as well. Keep up your defamatory remarks, by all means, it really shows everyone what you really are (and it ain't a truth teller). No substantive rebuttal offered. Noted. Thanks for the help AC! This information will be quite useful to the project... ..for there's no shame in being defeated in something, let's say like chess, by a Fisher or Kasparov. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 11/29/2012 11:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 ... Quoting: Dr. Astro Yes, I am. The number of things you're wrong about grows... ... Right, it orbits closer and faster, making it behave far less like normal stars. The moon orbits much farther away and much slower, so as far as field rotation goes it behaves just like the stars. Both, however, experience field rotation from rising to setting. ... You keep shooting yourself in the foot but you don't even realize it. Your stupidity knows no bounds. ... Which? ISS or the moon? ISS I shot with the telescope, but if you could see it by eye with that kind of resolution that's exactly what you'd see. The moon I also shot with a standard camcorder on a standard camera tripod, showing what you see by eye. I saw the moon by eye that night the same way the camcorder showed it. It's just a standard altitude-azimuth view, the same view I just showed of ISS which was shot from an altitude-azimuth perspective. ... Wrong. I have not only stated the truth, but I proved it as well. Keep up your defamatory remarks, by all means, it really shows everyone what you really are (and it ain't a truth teller). Yeah, you're defeated, blah blah blah Wow, you wrote an entire paragraph and not once did you say anything of substance. You did, however, fulfill Danth's law. Don't be such a sore loser! Danth's law applies once again. So don't worry, I'm not the "sore loser" in this equation. [link to rationalwiki.org] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25480060 South Korea 11/29/2012 11:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 Wow, you wrote an entire paragraph and not once did you say anything of substance. You did, however, fulfill Danth's law. Don't be such a sore loser! Danth's law applies once again. So don't worry, I'm not the "sore loser" in this equation. [link to rationalwiki.org] The ever ironies of ironies, the good faux doctor out of his element! to :35. past that, watch as you please, because we know you're smoking some heavy substances to not see what the rest of us plainly do! [link to www.youtube.com] |