No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !!

Users Online Now: 2,338 (Who's On?)		Visitors Today: 1,131,008
Pageviews Today: 1,888,965	Threads Today: 784	Posts Today: 13,590
06:23 PM

Page 1 Bottom Search Replies Previous Page Next Page
Search Terms: Highlight Matches
No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !!
Cyndexia Offer Upgrade User ID: 704712 Puerto Rico 07/29/2010 11:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !! Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) announced Wednesday night that he is considering introducing a constitutional amendment that would change existing law to no longer grant citizenship to the children of immigrants born in the United States. Currently, the 14th Amendment grants citizenship to any child born in the United States. But with 12 million illegal immigrants living in the U.S., Graham said it may be time to restrict the ability of immigrants to have children who become citizens just because they are born in the country. Read more: [link to www.politico.com] 14th Amendment, which states that, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” The amendment was ratified in 1868 as one of several reforms aimed at giving Constitutional rights to former slaves. "Sometimes the object of the Journey may not be the end, but the Journey itself" :2013: Email: [email protected] :)

Anonymous Coward User ID: 957500 United States 07/29/2010 11:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !! I 100% agree with amending that fucked up "right". bravo.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 930337 United States 07/29/2010 11:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !! GOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cyndexia (OP) User ID: 704712 Puerto Rico 07/29/2010 11:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !! I am sure the amendment was designed for the time. "Sometimes the object of the Journey may not be the end, but the Journey itself" :2013: Email: [email protected] :)

Cyndexia (OP) User ID: 704712 Puerto Rico 07/29/2010 11:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !! I 100% agree with amending that fucked up "right". bravo. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 957500 "Sometimes the object of the Journey may not be the end, but the Journey itself" :2013: Email: [email protected] :)
Cyndexia (OP) User ID: 704712 Puerto Rico 07/30/2010 12:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !! GOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 930337 "Sometimes the object of the Journey may not be the end, but the Journey itself" :2013: Email: [email protected] :)
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1039743 United States 07/30/2010 12:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !! Might save the border state ERs some lost bucks spent on mooch deadbeat deliveries...

Anonymous Coward User ID: 1018917 United States 07/30/2010 02:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !! We shall see, eh? Graham isn't one of the "good guys." He helped get us into Iraq, and we can see how well THAT has gone for us. He's willing to go after Iran, which means more stresses on our troops. Graham has problems with the right of habeas corpus, and would deny it to those deemed "enemy combatants." That might seem all fluffy and good until Joe Schmoe protests a war, is arrested, and deemed an "enemy combatant." My point is that Graham is not one of the 'good guys.' It's an election year, and he's hoping to gain some points. I'd be more impressed if the man hadn't announced that he was 'considering' introducing a constitutional amendment but went ahead and did the deed right out of the gate.
Page 1 Top Previous Page Next Page

Related Threads

GLP