Mars Global Surveyor finds Pharaoh carved in mountain. | |
2342 (OP) User ID: 1109456 United States 11/28/2010 02:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 100% accurate scale model for comparison. size differentiation can be CLEARLY seen... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 940676[link to img683.imageshack.us] Look its a martian. Come on man, really? I think he's serious. Not only is it a martian but he just spent his time doodling and uploading it. This is what public schools and the gmo food industry now turn out, perpetual adolescents. www.youtube.com/clandestinetimelord |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1095980 United States 11/28/2010 02:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1115160 United States 11/28/2010 02:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 100% accurate scale model for comparison. size differentiation can be CLEARLY seen... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 940676[link to img683.imageshack.us] Look its a martian. Come on man, really? I think he's serious. Not only is it a martian but he just spent his time doodling and uploading it. This is what public schools and the gmo food industry now turn out, perpetual adolescents. which took all of 2 minutes...compared to the countless hours you idiots are wasting looking at a picture of nothing...thanks for the laugh tho |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 910386 United States 11/28/2010 02:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is an amazing find. Clearly you can see it is a Pharaoh carved into rock. Quoting: 2342How do you explain this ? IMAGE ( [link to i817.photobucket.com] ) I have seen pharaohs in my closet at night then...and in the fake wood design of my door. It is an illusion...we see what we expect to see. But it is not a pharaoh it is just a rock. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 910386 United States 11/28/2010 02:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: BROKEN flat platforms are plentiful on Earth...many of which are naturally formed. You can say that is created by intelligence...if you consider Nature intelligent. but it wasnt the aliens. |
T'bird User ID: 1040731 Canada 11/28/2010 02:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I downloaded the full resolution TIFF, and opened it in photoshop, and if you look close, you will see touch up artifacts all over that pic. They have blocked out all types of things all over that wall. You will see very distinctive squares that are obviously covering something up all over that picture. Download the hi rez and look for yourself. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 967932Particularly on the left side of the pyramyd looking formation to the left of the pharaoh, there are very distinctive edits to the image, in very clear square shapes. Can anyone else confirm this? They pyramid looks like it has a differentiated capstone, and a large "stripe" goes up and to the right from that. In that stripe, there are clear edits. After enlarging the pic to max I can see the obvious edits, especially the large stripe you mention. Also, about a third of the way across the picture from the right edge, and about half way between the top and bottom of the pic (almost level with Pharaoh's head) look at the black rectangles (holes?) in the rocks. There are several of them and they don't look anything like natural formations. They are too symmetric to be natural. Patriotism is supporting your country always -- and your government when they deserve it. Mark Twain Those who beat their swords into plowshares usually end up plowing for those who kept their swords. -Benjamin Franklin |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 910386 United States 11/28/2010 02:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Please follow the link to the original image on NASA's site. Read the paragraph below. The whole side of that is only 12 meters. The "Pharaoh" in question can't be more than a few centimeters tall. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1141154If this where some massive mountain side with a carved image a couple hundred feet high I might buy it. Erosion over the eons would take awhile on a large carving. However something as small as this is clearly just an anomaly of weather erosion. Seeing what you want to and not what is actually there is a staple of this community. THIS |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 910386 United States 11/28/2010 02:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 910386 United States 11/28/2010 02:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | After enlarging the pic to max I can see the obvious edits, especially the large stripe you mention. Also, about a third of the way across the picture from the right edge, and about half way between the top and bottom of the pic (almost level with Pharaoh's head) look at the black rectangles (holes?) in the rocks. There are several of them and they don't look anything like natural formations. They are too symmetric to be natural. Quoting: T'birdToo symmetrical to be natural? Oh is that a fact? Cuz there are plenty of very symmetrical things on Earth that are natural...and that is a proven fact. Not saying aliens do not exist...just saying yall are looking so hard you refuse to see the truth. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1176642 United States 11/28/2010 03:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Jessie User ID: 1004337 United States 11/28/2010 03:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1163188 Australia 11/28/2010 03:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is an amazing find. Clearly you can see it is a Pharaoh carved into rock. Quoting: 2342How do you explain this ? IMAGE ( [link to i817.photobucket.com] ) rofl |
Heretic_333 User ID: 1176642 United States 11/28/2010 03:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | there arent any lateral lines on the guy. and look at the rock face, up, left, 45 degree angle from the anomaly "nose" thats too flat for mars. sorry. If I told you everything I am about to say is a lie. Is it truth or a lie? I built the wrench necessary to bolt the 3 stage capping process on the BP oil spill. Tattered banners, and bloody flags... The wind of Odin sweeps it all. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 940283 Finland 11/28/2010 03:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wasn't it some only 30 cm size? Quoting: 2342Where did you hear that? Difficult to know measures in a pic. But here are the pyramids [link to www.esa.int] Click and zoom, its on the top corner. See the geometric stuff there. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 967932 United States 11/28/2010 03:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Please follow the link to the original image on NASA's site. Read the paragraph below. The whole side of that is only 12 meters. The "Pharaoh" in question can't be more than a few centimeters tall. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 910386If this where some massive mountain side with a carved image a couple hundred feet high I might buy it. Erosion over the eons would take awhile on a large carving. However something as small as this is clearly just an anomaly of weather erosion. Seeing what you want to and not what is actually there is a staple of this community. THIS There are clear edits to this photo, there is no denying that. With that in mind, why should we believe that they are tellin the truth as to the size of the cliff. YES......THAT |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1176977 Australia 11/28/2010 03:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yall do realize this cliff from its lowest point to its highest point is only 30 some feet tall? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 910386That is not that high at all. Learn to figure out how big the cliff is before making insane analysis of it. Look brainiac, have you considered that maybe the people living on Mars are all very small??? Like if Mars people were only 2 or 3 inches tall, a 12 inch statue would be HUUUUUUUUGE to them!!! HUUUUUUUUUUGE!!!!!1 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1176977 Australia 11/28/2010 03:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 281126 Netherlands 11/28/2010 03:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1176999 United States 11/28/2010 04:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Himie User ID: 1177014 United States 11/28/2010 04:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey guys, I think it looks like a Pharaoh also, not like anyone cares though... What I do find extremely interesting that nobody has seemed to notice, or at least hasn't said anything about is, I reviews all the images in series from PIA10209.tif up to PIA10216.tif. 9, 10, and 11 are all of the same same cliff, which I personally doubt is only 39 feet tall. Regardless, in examining the 3 images, the image we are all questioning, ending in 10, is the smallest file size of the 3, with the next largest image being double the size. Image 9, in tiff format, is 44.8 megs, image 10 is 15.6 megs, and image 11 is 30.5 megs. This, in my mind, poses the question, why? Since it is highly unlikely the camera switched in to a lower resolution for the middle image, I, having a strong background in graphics and video production, can only conclude it was a side effect of the image manipulation process used to edit the image. Which then begs the question, why, if images 9 and 11 were left un-doctored, was the image in question modified prior to being posted on the official site? What was in it that was so important, it had to be modified prior to allowing the image out to the public? These are not stitched images as in 12+, they are single frame stills, so what reason other than obfuscation of the truth could there be to manipulate the image in question? So while some of you would deny the existence of other life forms even while you were strapped to a table with a probe up yer wazoo, I think it will be hard to deny the image was manipulated. Artifacts a side, of which there are many, an image half the size of the one before it, and 1/3rd the size of the very next image makes it suspect regardless of the already detected anomalies. I also found that large rock with the flat bottom in the foreground about almost halfway between dead center and the left edge of the image suspect. It appears to me like the head of a dog dislodged from a statue and leaning on it's left ear with the face facing right. Almost like the top of a sphinx.. but that's just my own personal opinion and observation, the file sizes are fact. Himie |
3's and 7's User ID: 1132928 United States 11/28/2010 05:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This, in my mind, poses the question, why? Since it is highly unlikely the camera switched in to a lower resolution for the middle image, I, having a strong background in graphics and video production, can only conclude it was a side effect of the image manipulation process used to edit the image. Which then begs the question, why, if images 9 and 11 were left un-doctored, was the image in question modified prior to being posted on the official site? What was in it that was so important, it had to be modified prior to allowing the image out to the public? Quoting: Himie 1177014These are not stitched images as in 12+, they are single frame stills, so what reason other than obfuscation of the truth could there be to manipulate the image in question? Himie Finally! Someone gets "it". Very well said Himie! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 956907 United Kingdom 11/28/2010 06:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 957943 United Kingdom 11/28/2010 06:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This, in my mind, poses the question, why? Since it is highly unlikely the camera switched in to a lower resolution for the middle image, I, having a strong background in graphics and video production, can only conclude it was a side effect of the image manipulation process used to edit the image. Which then begs the question, why, if images 9 and 11 were left un-doctored, was the image in question modified prior to being posted on the official site? What was in it that was so important, it had to be modified prior to allowing the image out to the public? Quoting: 3's and 7's 1132928These are not stitched images as in 12+, they are single frame stills, so what reason other than obfuscation of the truth could there be to manipulate the image in question? Himie Finally! Someone gets "it". Very well said Himie! IT WAS EDITED BECAUSE WHAT WE ARE LOOKING AT MOVED BETWEEN FRAMES/SHOTS |
fishingthestyx User ID: 1177097 Australia 11/28/2010 06:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
2342 (OP) User ID: 1109456 United States 11/28/2010 09:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
2342 (OP) User ID: 1109456 United States 11/28/2010 09:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey guys, Quoting: Himie 1177014I think it looks like a Pharaoh also, not like anyone cares though... What I do find extremely interesting that nobody has seemed to notice, or at least hasn't said anything about is, I reviews all the images in series from PIA10209.tif up to PIA10216.tif. 9, 10, and 11 are all of the same same cliff, which I personally doubt is only 39 feet tall. Regardless, in examining the 3 images, the image we are all questioning, ending in 10, is the smallest file size of the 3, with the next largest image being double the size. Image 9, in tiff format, is 44.8 megs, image 10 is 15.6 megs, and image 11 is 30.5 megs. This, in my mind, poses the question, why? Since it is highly unlikely the camera switched in to a lower resolution for the middle image, I, having a strong background in graphics and video production, can only conclude it was a side effect of the image manipulation process used to edit the image. Which then begs the question, why, if images 9 and 11 were left un-doctored, was the image in question modified prior to being posted on the official site? What was in it that was so important, it had to be modified prior to allowing the image out to the public? These are not stitched images as in 12+, they are single frame stills, so what reason other than obfuscation of the truth could there be to manipulate the image in question? So while some of you would deny the existence of other life forms even while you were strapped to a table with a probe up yer wazoo, I think it will be hard to deny the image was manipulated. Artifacts a side, of which there are many, an image half the size of the one before it, and 1/3rd the size of the very next image makes it suspect regardless of the already detected anomalies. I also found that large rock with the flat bottom in the foreground about almost halfway between dead center and the left edge of the image suspect. It appears to me like the head of a dog dislodged from a statue and leaning on it's left ear with the face facing right. Almost like the top of a sphinx.. but that's just my own personal opinion and observation, the file sizes are fact. Himie www.youtube.com/clandestinetimelord |
2342 (OP) User ID: 1109456 United States 11/28/2010 09:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is an amazing find. Clearly you can see it is a Pharaoh carved into rock. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 910386How do you explain this ? IMAGE ( [link to i817.photobucket.com] ) I have seen pharaohs in my closet at night then...and in the fake wood design of my door. It is an illusion...we see what we expect to see. But it is not a pharaoh it is just a rock. www.youtube.com/clandestinetimelord |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1095980 United States 11/28/2010 01:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1095980 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1177613 United States 11/28/2010 04:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Theoferrum User ID: 1083407 United States 11/28/2010 05:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is an amazing find. Clearly you can see it is a Pharaoh carved into rock. Quoting: 2342How do you explain this ? IMAGE ( [link to i817.photobucket.com] ) There is only one explanation for it : Antediluvia : The World that then was The antediluvian's achieved space flight an colonized mars and built the pyramids there at the same time they were building them here including those in Europe, Africa, Asia and South America and the proof is that they glorify the Zodiac Sign of Taurus placing them in the Age of Taurus at around 4KBC (four thousand years before Christ), which perfectly agrees with the Egyptologists. If my websites do not load its because I've been Black Listed like here on GLP - note my signiature below and they won't let me post YouTubes anymore - gee, I wonder why? Welcome to my World... [link to theoferrum.never_learn] |