U.N. Ozark Arkansas, Missouri Land Grabs | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1223606 United States 01/16/2011 01:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1232311 United States 01/16/2011 01:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
~Stormy~ User ID: 1226169 United States 01/16/2011 01:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1223606 United States 01/16/2011 01:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just like everything else. This was fought off the first time, and now their looking into how to make it happen the next time they try it. As usual, we can't vote and just say no. We have to say no time and time again until we are out of funds, or worn out or they eventually get their own people in every level of policy making. |
Karu User ID: 826286 United States 01/16/2011 01:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Excellent info on that here: [link to prfamerica.org] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1232331 United States 01/16/2011 01:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1223606 United States 01/16/2011 02:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Excellent info on that here: [link to prfamerica.org] Quoting: KaruExcellent link! LOL-they say this about opponents... read between the lines for latent and hidden meanings contained in primary sources and made sweeping conclusions about the meaning of terms, phrases, and passages within those documents. ...don't we have to these days? Everything is always doublespeak. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1231009 United States 01/16/2011 02:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Final designation of the Ozarks, or perhaps just parts of the Ozarks such as the Current and Jacks Fork Rivers, as a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve, and ultimately a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve "in danger," will remove control of the Ozarks from even the US Government and place the land under control of United Nations World Government. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1223606"the panties too, boy, take off them panties too....now bend over and squeal like a pig for me, boy". LOL, yeah right! |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1223606 United States 01/16/2011 02:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Excellent info on that here: [link to prfamerica.org] Quoting: KaruAlso reported: Speakers at such meetings were a combination of local Biosphere Reserve 'researchers,' seasoned private property rights activists, as well as some national UN/environmental conspiracy experts. The goal of speakers was to share information and interpretations about Biosphere Reserves, the OMAB nomination, and a variety of other pertinent information. LOL, I don't understand the why the word conspiracy was used. The U.N. is trying to take over many places. |
Phennommennonn Forum Administrator User ID: 1034196 United States 01/16/2011 02:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Final designation of the Ozarks, or perhaps just parts of the Ozarks such as the Current and Jacks Fork Rivers, as a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve, and ultimately a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve "in danger," will remove control of the Ozarks from even the US Government and place the land under control of United Nations World Government. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1223606yellow stones supposed to have a sign that says owned by the UN....as a few more "national parks" <--i use that term loosely political correctness is a doctrine.... fostered by a delusional, illogical minority...... and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media; which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1223606 United States 01/16/2011 02:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's some fun GLP type stuff: [link to prfamerica.org] According to opponents, the primary symptom of a coming 'green' socialist government is the erosion of private property rights. The loss of ownership and control of private property was equated with the loss of Constitutionally guaranteed individual rights and privileges. Access to property ownership and land use rights are, according to opponents, tantamount to the preservation of democracy and national sovereignty. The trend toward environmental regulation, which threatens property ownership and control, is conceived of as a trend toward socialism or communism. Jane Darcy, a Take Back Arkansas representative, indicated that the Biosphere Reserve issue highlighted growing problems of suppression and control of individual rights and freedoms by government. She commented on the core issue saying: [T]here isn't one government agency given the opportunity to spread their authority and take rights that won't put this nation in real… I don't know what you would call it… throes of actual communism. I mean, there are two systems of government essentially. The system of government that respects individual rights and the system of government that takes those rights, there's no in between. (Jane Darcy, personal interview) A variety of extraordinary claims about the OMAB circulated throughout the Ozarks and beyond. Some of the more popular allegations were the following: forced reduction and relocation of the Ozark population and placement of citizens in concentration camps; destruction of homes, businesses, and infrastructure in order to reclaim areas as wilderness; accession of Ozark land and natural resources to the United Nations; and the presence or likely arrival of United Nations military troops in the Ozarks, which explained the alleged black helicopter and white tank sightings in the Ozarks region. One letter to the editor suspiciously reported, They imply the U.N. is concerned about certain life forms, but is this true? Or just another insult to our intelligence? To be honest, the entire matter reeks of subversion. Rumor has it that the U.N. is to train foreign troops on our soil in the art of warfare, but under the guise of "ecological research," and if the federal government goes through with this U.N. land grab the citizens of the Ozarks region will be left out literally in the cold. (Dean 1996:2) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 653278 United States 01/16/2011 02:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Final designation of the Ozarks, or perhaps just parts of the Ozarks such as the Current and Jacks Fork Rivers, as a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve, and ultimately a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve "in danger," will remove control of the Ozarks from even the US Government and place the land under control of United Nations World Government. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1231009"the panties too, boy, take off them panties too....now bend over and squeal like a pig for me, boy". LOL, yeah right! that was in georgia |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1223606 United States 01/16/2011 02:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1223606 United States 01/16/2011 02:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Final designation of the Ozarks, or perhaps just parts of the Ozarks such as the Current and Jacks Fork Rivers, as a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve, and ultimately a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve "in danger," will remove control of the Ozarks from even the US Government and place the land under control of United Nations World Government. Quoting: Phennommennonnyellow stones supposed to have a sign that says owned by the UN....as a few more "national parks" <--i use that term loosely Yeah, I remember hearing that. [link to arcticcompass.blogspot.com] I remember seeing U.N. signs and I don't see them now. I wonder if they took those down. Now it is under the heading of "International Biosphere Reserve". It does have the word "international" in the title-what else would that mean? Half way down the page you'll see this listed under the park sign in Tennessee: [link to arcticcompass.blogspot.com] |
Wayne_Ker User ID: 1229794 United States 01/16/2011 02:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1119280 United States 01/16/2011 02:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1232215 United States 01/16/2011 03:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1154424 United States 01/16/2011 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Heh, I guess I'm in the right place (first time for everything) Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1119280Until someone gets pissed and pushes that old New Madrid Fault button. ....UN has many places to hide..... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1232432 United States 01/16/2011 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Pug User ID: 1232436 New Zealand 01/16/2011 03:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A residents views are worth reading. [link to bungalowbillscw.blogspot.com] [link to bungalowbillscw.blogspot.com] [link to bungalowbillscw.blogspot.com] Just the Ozarks or is this happening elsewhere? |
Judeth User ID: 1232290 United Kingdom 01/16/2011 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Karu User ID: 826286 United States 01/16/2011 03:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The UN have taken over the Ozark high school as well using the International Baccalaureate agenda. Quoting: PugA residents views are worth reading. [link to bungalowbillscw.blogspot.com] [link to bungalowbillscw.blogspot.com] [link to bungalowbillscw.blogspot.com] Just the Ozarks or is this happening elsewhere? Absolutely shocking! from your link: " Sunday, November 28, 2010 Ozark Schools Going Down Wrong Path With United Nation's International Baccalaureate (IBO) Program Residents of Ozark, Missouri, and taxpayers of Christian County should be outraged that officials at Ozark High School have taken $9500 of your money to apply to become a member of the United Nation's International Baccalaureate education program. As well, if the school continues down this path the cost to taxpayers will continue to increase as the sovereignty of our school district continues to be transferred from our community to a world government authority. Those who understand the pathetic job the federal government has contributed to public education in the United States must surely be alarmed to know the United Nations is about to have a say in your child's education. While school officials are selling the IB program to parents as something that will help prepare kids for college, there is a globalist agenda connected to the IB and it's all part of the corrupt United Nations. In other words, the promise of a better education comes with a liberal globalist agenda. One wouldn't think the conservative community of Ozark would allow this to be taking place in its district, but it's happening very quickly. School officials are stuck on talking points of using IB so kids can get better placement in colleges, but once you peel away the layers of the IB agenda, IB is the last organization you want educating your kids. If parents are worried about the quality of education, they need to work locally to improve education to better prepare children for college. Looking outside at larger governing bodies such as the federal government has produced years of failures including No Child Left Behind. Now the school officials at Ozark are looking towards the United Nations to educate your children. I don't know if you pay attention to the UN or not, but the anti-American sentiment runs too think for my comfort. So let's look at what the Ozark School Board isn't telling you about the International Baccalaureate. The International Bureaucratically has a global political mission to produce good little world citizens. I don't believe this is an American idea, especially at a time when so many things that are American are being attacked and withdrawn from our schools. Dr. Ian Hill, Deputy Director of IBO, has said that the goal of IBO is the promotion of world citizenship. Wouldn't our country be better off if our students focus on being good Americans and learning the principles of freedom and the founding fathers over the agenda of the IBO that focuses on a global human rights agenda. The IBO supports a Earth Charter, a document that opposes many American ideas and a document the United States refuses to ratify. When you start looking into IBO's endorsement of Earth Charter, you will see that it is tied into Marxism and socialism. Surely, that's not what Ozark residents want for their children. The following statement was issued by IBO: We, the undersigned, endorse the Earth Charter. We embrace the spirit and aims of the document. We pledge to join the global partnership for a just, sustainable, and peaceful world and to work for the realization of the values and principles of the Earth Charter. We pledge to join the Global Partnership in Support of the Earth Charter Initiative for a sustainable way of life AND urge all governments to endorse the Earth Charter. The following is a few items of interest parents may want to know before Ozark High School continues spending your tax dollars to enter this Marxist education program: The Earth Charter is housed in the Arc of Hope and is correctly identified by the World Pantheist Association as a Pantheistic document. Besides Pantheism, the Earth Charter advocates: 1. The redistribution of wealth between nations and within nations [Art. 10.a.] 2. Same-sex marriage [Art. 12.a.] 3. Spiritual education [Art 14.d.] which means education in Pantheism. 4. Military disarmament [Art. 16.d.&e.] 5. Creation of an international agency to make the Earth Charter binding on all nations [in The Way Forward action-plan.]" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1231995 United States 01/16/2011 03:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1223606 United States 01/16/2011 03:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The UN have taken over the Ozark high school as well using the International Baccalaureate agenda. Quoting: PugA residents views are worth reading. [link to bungalowbillscw.blogspot.com] [link to bungalowbillscw.blogspot.com] [link to bungalowbillscw.blogspot.com] Just the Ozarks or is this happening elsewhere? I'm curious if this is happening elsewhere as well. I read in the 3rd link they are, of course, for gun control. Can't believe Ozark let these people in. (Ozark is the name of a city in the region called the Ozarks, fyi for anyone not from here). I guess they realize it will take at least a generation to subvert this place. Much harder here for them to push agendas than on the coastal areas. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1223606 United States 01/16/2011 03:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Told you I was in a safe zone! lol Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1231995If the Mississippi river caves in, and a sea forms all the way up to the great lakes, then you are not safe, for then hurricanes can come up at full strength into the Ozarks, is that not true? In relation to the future map of the Mississippi river, there is still much land between the new river and the Ozarks. How far does a hurricane travel inward. Just estimating that the ozarks are an hours to an hour and one half drive from where the "new" riverbed would lay. |
Salaama User ID: 1226176 United States 01/16/2011 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1231928 United Kingdom 01/16/2011 03:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Told you I was in a safe zone! lol Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1231995If the Mississippi river caves in, and a sea forms all the way up to the great lakes, then you are not safe, for then hurricanes can come up at full strength into the Ozarks, is that not true? When the poleshift comes, the Great Lakes will empty into the Gulf of Mexico. So, they're fecked if they think they're safe from flooding there. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1227560 United States 01/16/2011 03:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and more recently, having a fortress being built by what I think I read as a Defense Department geospacial big wig.) Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1223606more info about that Defense Contractor's fortress that's being built with "concrete and bulletproof glass" ($7 million in materials) - except that it's being built with a new technology they are not willing to reveal: Thread: ***LARGEST HOME IN U.S.BEING BUILT IN...*** (Page 3) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1231928 United Kingdom 01/16/2011 03:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1227560 United States 01/16/2011 03:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and more recently, having a fortress being built by what I think I read as a Defense Department geospacial big wig.) Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1227560more info about that Defense Contractor's fortress that's being built with "concrete and bulletproof glass" ($7 million in materials) - except that it's being built with a new technology they are not willing to reveal: Thread: ***LARGEST HOME IN U.S.BEING BUILT IN...*** (Page 3) “The technology involved with the construction is proprietary in nature,” Joe Huff said. “it’s not information we are prepared to talk about right now.” |