NANCY TURNER BANKS - THE DEADLY FALSE HIV VIRUS OF INTERNATIONAL GREED [VIDEO]

[link to www.youtube.com]

MD injects himself with HIV live on TV...."HIV does not cause
AIDS"

AIDS; WORDS FROM THE FRONT [link to www.virusmyth.com]
Interview with Peter Duesberg
By Bob Guccione, Jr.

Spin Sept. 1993


Professor Peter Duesberg believes HIV doesn't cause AIDS. Is he the heretic the medical establishment claims, or a 20th - century Galileo? Bob Guccione, Jr. tries to find out.

In March 1987, Dr. Peter Duesberg, professor of molecular biology at the University of California, Berkeley, and one of the world's leading experts on retroviruses, a field he helped pioneer, wrote in Cancer Research that he didn't believe HIV, a retrovirus, caused AIDS. He argued that HIV was too inactive, infected too few cells, and was too difficult to even find in AIDS patients to be responsible. And since the virus is notoriously difficult to isolate, antibody detection became the indicator of infection-something Duesberg protested is highly inconsistent. Antibodies dominant over a virtually unfindable virus has always meant the immune system has triumphed over the invader, not capitulated to it. Finally, there were AIDS cases without any HIV, virus or antibody, further weakening the hypothesis. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) swept those under the carpet by changing the definition of what an AIDS patient is to necessarily include HIV infections. But hundreds of HIV-free, certified AIDS cases surfaced again at the 1992 International Conference on AIDS, and now total over 4,000. This time the CDC changed the name of the disease. Duesberg contends it's AIDS nonetheless and changing the name only further distracts from the likelihood that HIV doesn't cause it.

Duesberg was and continues to be assailed for his views. Science progresses by debate but, AIDS, suffused with overtones of life-style criticism and moralizing, became as much a social issue as a medical one. Truth became subjective and relative and as hard to pinpoint as an exit in a house of mirrors. At first, the medical establishment tried to dismiss Duesberg, then, when that failed, became obsessed with him. Each advancement and understanding of detecting the virus was trumpeted as crushing Duesberg but never succeeded in doing so. "They move the goalpost," he said repeatedly, "but they don't change anything." A number of the world's top scientists began agreeing with him, including Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR, the most elaborate HIV detection machine: He believes HIV doesn't cause AIDS. Duesberg's credentials are impeccable. He is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and a recipient of an Outstanding Investigative Grant from the National Institutes of Health in 1985. He was a candidate for the Nobel Prize for his work in discovering oncogenes, thought to be a cause of cancer, in viruses. But he derailed his chances of winning when he cautioned that his findings did not prove that there were cancer genes in cells, as was popularly theorized at the time (and still an unproven theory). An insane move for a scientist's career but an exemplary act of ethics.

I interviewed Duesberg over the course of a month, beginning in his cramped office in his Berkeley laboratory and continuing through hours of long distance telephone cross-examinations. As the government health agencies still fail to produce a single effective treatment, a vaccine, or even proof of how HIV is supposed to bring on AIDS, Professor Duesberg's skepticism about HIV and his hypothesis about what he believes are the real causes of AIDS become ever more important to hear.

SPIN: Why do you think HIV doesn't cause AIDS?

Dr. Peter Duesberg: Every virus I've ever seen gets its job done by killing a cell at a time, and when it has killed enough, you get sick. HIV is said to be responsible for the loss of T-cells, which are the immune system. Now, in every AIDS patient studied so far, there is never more than, on average, one in 1,000 cells infected by HIV.

How many cells in 1,000 would another virus infect-for instance a flu virus?

If it would cause flu, then 30 percent of your lung cells are ruined by the virus, the lining is gone, or is infected. If you have hepatitis almost every single cell in your liver is infected.

A lot of very bright scientists are working in AIDS and they don't all have dubious agendas and they must have asked themselves the same questions. If HIV doesn't kill a lot of cells, why is it widely believed to be the cause of AIDS?

By assigning it all these unprecedented, paradoxical properties that no other virus ever had. They say it can kill cells indirectly, or can induce something called autoimmunity, which essentially is, the virus sends out a trigger and the body is now convinced to commit suicide. Or they say there are cofactors, if you really press them hard on it. But what they are has yet to be determined.

How feasible is the argument that HIV triggers autoimmunity?

It is very implausible indeed. There are a million Americans with HIV who are totally healthy. There are six million Africans according to the World Health Organization who have HIV; 129,000 had AIDS by the end of last year, that means five million eight hundred and so many thousand had no AIDS. Half a million Europeans have HIV and 60,000 have AIDS. So there are millions and millions of people on this planet who have [HIV but] no AIDS-why don't seven-and-a-half million get autoimmune disease if HIV is the cause of an autoimmune disease?

Well, the establishment says that everybody with HIV will develop AIDS and it's just a matter of time.


In the last ten years this has happened in America to about 20 percent of all people with HIV, 250,000[including deaths to date] out of a million. But the people who are dying from AIDS are hardly ever your all-American friends of 20 to 40 years of age: Virtually all heterosexual Americans and Europeans who had AIDS are intravenous drug users. And the homosexuals who get AIDS had hundreds if not thousands of sexual contacts. That is not achieved with your conventional testosterone. It is achieved with chemicals. Those are the risk groups, they inhale poppers, they use amphetamines, they take Quaaludes, they take amyl nitrite, they take cocaine as aphrodisiacs.

These guys have been doing interviews on GCN with George Whitehurst Berry <-- that guy is some kind of disinfo. He really did a number with Deusberg, garbling his track backwards ect. Completely retarded.

[link to www.youtube.com]

here's a quote from David Rasnick Phd in molecular biology and retrovirus researcher:

AIDS is now institutionalized. If AIDS were to go away tomorrow, it would be a catastrophe for the people that depend on it, you know. It's a multi-billion dollar industry. There are people who have reputations, whole institutes. Gallo now is the leader of the Human Retroviral Institute, a totally pointless institute. It has no function at all. Retroviruses are harmless, and yet you've got this whole institute to research them. So they don't want to see this go away, obviously.

Abbott makes $1 million on their blood tests. They don't want to see that go away. And the companies that make AZT and the protease inhibitors, they don't want to see that go away. All of the little AIDS organizations, the little people in the community who've now risen up and now have status: they don't want to see it go away. It's become comfortable, and it's a sociological thing.

The AIDS thing -- the hysteria, the stupidity, the institutional craziness -- would all disappear if the fear disappeared. The whole thing is kept together by fear, intimidation, terrorism and brutality. Think about it. If you're an HIV-positive pregnant woman and you tell your doctor, "I'm not going to take AZT," he'll want to throw you in jail and threaten to take your child away!

It's fear all the way through. Even scientists, people like me, are subjected to fear and intimidation. You're supposed to be open, and be able to talk. I can talk to my own colleagues, freely and openly, on virtually every topic in science -- even about whether there are deities or not -- except alternatives to HIV as the cause of AIDS. It's astounding! It's incredible! When I went to school, I was taught that only happened 1,000 years ago!

Oh my god!...you mean all that shit we heard about AIDS were just lies made up so people could make more money??????

fraid so......we were HOAXED!!!!!!!! War on Terror....War on AIDS = war on the people......

I like this womans work. She is on iamthewitness.com (the french connection) from time to time. Very intelligent woman who knows whats up.

Shit... I'm so confused, then what causes AIDS? If it's not HIV?

Can somebody put it into simple words please?

Doctors

Eugenics, this world is pure evil, holy fuck.

Yes.... a Harvard trained MD obgyn...totally renegade from the system....

[youtube]

HIV AIDS is a retrovirus

FUNDING causes aids....DOCTORS and scientists connected to BIG PHARMA
found a bunch of dopers who did a lot of "poppers" cocaine and mainlining while they fucked each other in the ass with different partners every single night. These degenerate human trash had ruined their immune systems and were dying so the drug industry in cohoots with the FDA created a scary disease that is not really caused by a "retrovirus" but is caused by a lifestyle.

This life style is centered on drugs and is not exclusively homosexual. Aquired ImmuneDeficency also comes from malnutrition and poor sanitation such as found in very poor regions of the world.

These unfortunate but different groups were then put on very expensive drug
"cocktails" and we were told this terrible disease is contagious and would spread all over the world. These drugs caused the symptons they claimed to be "curing" .......

It hasn't spread....it was a con to make money....they did billions....

wow! this is great....

HIV is a harmless retrovirus and that has been among us for centuries. Millions of people carry this virus.

AIDS is ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY that manifests dozens of diseases and illnesses.

They are not related. We think they are because of a huge PR hoax on the scale of 9/11.....

They made us very afraid and increased their wealth, power and control this way exactly like a false flag terror attack...

Luckily there are a few honest scientists who tell the truth and admit publicly this is a lot of bunk...like Duesberg....
He was punished and lost all his funding. He wrote a book about the subject that is highly readable book called INVENTING THE AIDS VIRUS....


Read it. You won't be disappointed.