WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

It's going great. Just that certain souls will soon experience ultimate righteous indignation, so I'm just giving you a little taste of your future.

you have posted around 500 posts on this thread about absolutely nothing....fook all...
man you are a complete t1t.....

now shill off ffs...

I would wager most are cowardly enough here that no, no one will be apologizing on the 22nd. They will find a way instead to twist the information and come up with some sort of reasoning why it didn't happen and never admit being wrong.

Actually, what he posted made perfect sense. It's as if you didn't even read it, just decided to make a decision based on your biases.

I would wager most are cowardly enough here that no, no one will be apologizing on the 22nd. They will find a way instead to twist the information and come up with some sort of reasoning why it didn't happen and never admit being wrong.

It makes sense if you have a biased agenda and are in league with him. he is a known government agent and internet stalker, a criminal.

See, that's among the big differences between IDW and myself.

I don't ask you to believe anything. Not a single thing.

I cite sources, and explain exactly how I come to my provisional conclusions. With the links I give, anyone can see my chain of reasoning step by step. I can even tell you what evidence it would take for me to change my mind.

IDW, on the other hand, asks you to take his word for his claims, and any evidence to the contrary us automatically categorized as doctored or forged. He does not show his work, and when challenged about his own claims balks. His erroneous claims about the Windows Calculator, and supposed Selectively Visible Posts at GLP come to mind, among other erroneous claims of his.

He bends the evidence (or ignores it altogether) to suit his conclusions. I tailor my conclusions to fit the evidence.

Do you see the difference?

And, on the 22nd, when the internet is still functioning and there hasn't been a natural event cleansing the world of 90 percent of humanity, atom bombs are not flying about and my conclusions are verified while IDW's are falsified despite the supposed huge odds against my being correct, will you be back to apologize for your apparent rudeness?

Yes, that's one Fundamental difference between him and you. You are a follower while he is a Leader. Links to others' work means you have no original brilliant ideas of your own, instead having to rely on the accepted MS views of others.

The other fundamental difference is that you are an evil man. You've had lots of time in your stalkerish ways to fine-tune your justifications at pen's end, and while it may convince yourself and other simple naive folk, it's still complete and utter bs.

I won't need to apologize to anybody, but if I did, it wouldn't be to you because I have no respect for you whatsoever.

Your vitriol is silly. Science builds on what has come before, or it carefully modifies what has come before with better evidence. IDW's ideas do none of this.

As to your follower/leader thing -- what, exactly, are you doing, then?



Sigh. Such melodrama. What evidence do you have that I am evil? What in my behavior do you consider 'stalkerish?' And be careful how you answer -- it may just be that I have examples of IDW acting the very same way his very own self...



Your respect for me is irrelevant. What is relevant is which idea better describes reality.

IDW/A.A's doesn't. Simple as that. I am sorry that upsets you so.

spot-on.....

just how many people are you agent 74444?
you appear to be available almost 24 hours every day.

Not even close. I'm just 74444 -- I have no way to change my IP, so I'm stuck with the number, and have been for years. You usually only see from a few posts, to maybe a dozen in any given couple of days -- hardly super-prolific by GLP standards.

I'm just a single person, fairly average, who has disagreed with a number of IDW's ideas for a long time. That's all.

what time is it now in your part of the US?

Why do you wish to know?

Your vitriol is silly. Science builds on what has come before, or it carefully modifies what has come before with better evidence. IDW's ideas do none of this.

As to your follower/leader thing -- what, exactly, are you doing, then?



Sigh. Such melodrama. What evidence do you have that I am evil? What in my behavior do you consider 'stalkerish?' And be careful how you answer -- it may just be that I have examples of IDW acting the very same way his very own self...



Your respect for me is irrelevant. What is relevant is which idea better describes reality.

IDW/A.A's doesn't. Simple as that. I am sorry that upsets you so.

Ah, I have finally deciphered this thread. It is an illustration of the Yin & Yang, using modern apocolypse theory as its bedrock. On the one hand, an explosive, hot tempered, foul mouthed pretender who spews prognostications without any verifiable supporting evidence (AA/IDW/RH). On the other, a logical, cool, collected pragmatist who saliently challenges the usupported claims (Agent 74444). Such entertaining bantor.

Please wake me up when its over so we can get on to the REAL DOOM. (financial collapse, resource depletion, societal moral decay, Corporatocracy (aka, Oligarchy), erosion of 'inalienable' rights, evironmental destruction, profiterring warmongering, erosion of family structure, genetically modified food, impending global fascist state...) Need I go on.

Three more days and a giant coronal hole the shape of an isosceles triangle has appeared on the Sun. The Navy's fleets have been recalled by the President and we are seeing across the board censorship of all apace weather data,

We can only guess what the proton flux and electron flux values are, they won't try to hide the geo magnetic data because it can be measured by anyone from the surface, also keep an eye on the Sun visually with welding lenses.

The emission will be from this persistent triangle.

Three days to go.

I hope not, you should go back to school and learn to spell, the gov is scraping the bottom of the barrel hiring drug addicts off the street. I wouldn't doubt it if you are a parolee paid in crack.

Looks like I upset YOU rather, and so you Had to resort to banning.

You won't win though, in the end.

At least as far as Little Ole me is concerned, I'm not Stalking ANYBODY. But I might stalk you, if you keep Pissing me off with the Bans. But no, there's simply no Time left. And so no need.

Since you're an Evil man, you'll be taken care of nicely automatically by the creator.

Sorry that I just spoiled your day/night, since you tried to make sure I wouldn't reply.

So childish that when a bona-fide shill loses, he throws a temper-tantrum and gets the other person shut-up. To also give the appearance that he's one or had the Final say. Think again, Simple- Minded Stalker Evil Man.

I would like to openly chastise and rebuke my critics who claim I have not supplied supporting data. read the fucking thread, they're goddamned liars.

I have no power to ban here, and on a personal note wish they wouldn't be so ban happy at this site.



All that has to happen for me to "win" is that the Internet still be here, my still being able to post, and the world pretty much continuing after the 22nd, proving exactly what IDW/A.A's 98.5% certainty of anything is actually worth.



Again, I have no power over banning here at GLP whatsoever.




Your religious beliefs aside -- other than challenging your claims (doggedly, I admit) what evidence do you have that I am evil?



Again, on the contrary: I definitely want you and IDW/A.A around up until and after the 22nd, because I fully anticipate the crow you are both going to have to eat. It won't be the first time for IDW/A.A at GLP.



Hm. I don't think I have ever thrown a temper tantrum
online -- particularly over such a silly subject. Perhaps that is evidence you might accept that I am not a 'bona-fide shill' after all?

Yet, somehow, I doubt you'll accept that. Ah, well.

IDK how AA has put up with you for so long. If it had been me, you'd have driven me insane with your inane posts a long, long time ago.

Why? I remain polite, I ask questions specifically related to the subject, I resist fallacious arguments, and point out apparent flaws in A.A's reasoning, as well as evidence that appears contrary to his claims, which I keep careful track of.

What's insane is that not more discourse takes place that way, and all the emotional reactions that get bandied hereabouts that accomplish so little.