WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

It is nonsense to you simply because you are intellectually incapable of understanding any of it and attempting (but doing a very poor job) to interfere with my thread by doing the only thing you can, attempt to attack my credibility, which is well established.

It's in the handbook, I have it right here. Where do you think i got the spell checking aggravation?

It is nonsense because you don't have a clue what you are talking about and readers have the right to know that. You have failed to provide any scientific backing for your statements. You make claims then avoid any real discussion. There is a name for this. It is called the Dunning-Kruger effect, a cognitive bias.


I is always captial.

I'm in NE Texas also. Service is "back" but very sketchy and slow.

Yesterday my horse was going apeshit. He was running around acting nuts, very agitated. I thought he just wanted out of his pasture into bigger pasture to run around because it was a nice Sunny day. He ran out the gate and frantically to the woods where he finally calmed down. He stayed in the cover of trees all day which is totally unlike him.
was very strange behavior but I didn't give it much thought until I read here about animals running for shade.

From this point forward unless you provide some useful, correct or pertinent information your posts will be ignored, and BTW I know psyche major when I hear one.

Ohhappydays, my horse looks just like yours :)
I am very worried about him if big animals are more affected :((

I have so far not heard anything about the larger animals, but I'm keeping an eye out for reports. I'm particularly curious about a story that was reported here when there was a swarm of activity in Yellowstone area recently. Story was that a herd of Bison was moved out of the hot zone, but it was not stated where the animals were moved to? I have remained curious about this.....where are they now?

Nothing of what you just said is what you posted. It is right there to see. You said interference. It isn't interference, it is attentuation.

You also said that visible is more easily absorbed than x-ray, UV, and infared. That is simply not true.

ALL electromagnetic radiation does not make it to the surface. What a silly statement.

Anectodatal statements are not evidence. Besides, correlation does not imply causation. It could be you causing people to be sick. You make claims and people who don't know any better believe you and think they are sick or falsely attribute real symptoms.

Another thing that you are wrong about.

So you are saying you cannot and will not provide any scientific backing of your claims.

Nothing of what you just said is what you posted. It is right there to see. You said interference. It isn't interference, it is attentuation.

You also said that visible is more easily absorbed than x-ray, UV, and infared. That is simply not true.

ALL electromagnetic radiation does not make it to the surface. What a silly statement.

x-ray, UV, and infrared are heavily attenuated.

UV and Infrared are NOT heavily attenuated. AT one time UV was, when there was an ozone layer, but now the ozone layer is so depleted UV radiation is dangerous. There are warnings about this all the time, even in mass media! Infrared is barely attenuated at all by the atmosphere when the Sun is nearly overhead.


You have a horrible job, and you can;t spell. U;s anecdotal not anectodatal I don't know how you cal live with yourself, but if they do let you in the bunkers, enjoy the barbeque because you're on the menu.
Have a nice day

Have no fear, I will answer every one of their bullshit attacks, I'm a bit busy right now and having internet/phone problems

[link to www.northstarbison.com]

Nearly everyone involved in NASA public relations knows who I am and a large number of government contractor PR men. Ask Phil Plait ,Jay Wesley or NASA's present public relations director if they've heard of me ( I am not sure of his identity , the last one quit after making a statement that space travel beyond the magnetosphere of the Earth by manned space missions wouldn't be possible for at least another 20 years in the future) NASA's (and academia's) leading astrophysics and astronomy scientists read every word I publish, and have many times directly plagiarized my work and claimed it as thier own.

For five years we had an old piece of furniture outside under a porch. This year the squirrels FILLED the huge bottom drawer with acorns. They were all perfect, not eaten. Never seen anythin g like it.

Except -- we don't know who you are, so asking them if they know you would be hard.

I know several people at NASA myself. Drop your name and I'll ask around.

Attenuation is a blockage or drop in signal strength as is indeed interference in radio frequency transmissions. And it can't be 'attentuation" because there is no such word.
If you knew anything about this subject the word attenuation would never be misspelled

Yes, it is true, is simply the fact that the flux levels of viable light are usually much higher because the photosphere is the surface of the Sun and it produces more "photons' of viable light that x rays. If you doubt infrared makes it to the surface of the Earth at high values, explain why the radiant heat of the Sun heats things up. I am arguing with an idiot. Take a look at the UV radiation levels where the Sun is nearly overhead. The same effect occurs with x radiation! And it's infrared , nor infared.

Yes it does. Aircraft flying at 30,000 feet frequently are exposed to high flux levels of x radiation when in the higher latitudes and at times at low latitudes. X radiation makes it to the surface during a geo effective solar x ray flare when the Sun is close to being directly overhead, I have measured it with my own instruments,

x-ray, UV, and infrared are heavily attenuated.

UV and Infrared are NOT heavily attenuated. AT one time UV was, when there was an ozone layer, but now the ozone layer is so depleted UV radiation is dangerous. There are warnings about this all the time, even in mass media! Infrared is barely attenuated at all by the atmosphere when the Sun is nearly overhead.


You have a horrible job, and you can;t spell. U;s anecdotal not anectodatal I don't know how you cal live with yourself, but if they do let you in the bunkers, enjoy the barbeque because you're on the menu.
Have a nice day

you're TALKING ABOUT CORRELATIONS WITH QUANTUM MECHANICS AND QUANTUM THEORY , WHICH ARE FAIRY TALES

Attenuation is a blockage or drop in signal strength as is indeed interference in radio frequency transmissions. And it can't be 'attentuation" because there is no such word.
If you knew anything about this subject the word attenuation would never be misspelled



Yes, it is true, is simply the fact that the flux levels of viable light are usually much higher because the photosphere is the surface of the Sun and it produces more "photons' of viable light that x rays. If you doubt infrared makes it to the surface of the Earth at high values, explain why the radiant heat of the Sun heats things up. I am arguing with an idiot. Take a look at the UV radiation levels where the Sun is nearly overhead. The same effect occurs with x radiation! And it's infrared , nor infared.


Yes it does. Aircraft flying at 30,000 feet frequently are exposed to high flux levels of x radiation when in the higher latitudes and at times at low latitudes. X radiation makes it to the surface during a geo effective solar x ray flare when the Sun is close to being directly overhead, I have measured it with my own instruments,



:o:< MICE JOB OF REAL TIME EDITING i AM USING A SPELL CHECKER AND CORRECTING EVERY WORD VERY CAREFULLY.

Search this site for IDW, fun times.

just from a quick two second search:

[link to www.gate.net]

radiation causes DNA to mutate that is a fact. These mutations, if in a germ line cell [for a creature that has them] are passed on and can cause beneficial changes in the genome. Or disastrous ones. When scientists are inducing mutations in organisms they use mutagens. Mutagens can be carcinogens... they can be x-rays ... radiation is a mutagen. Mutations can be beneficial, detrimental or of no consequence. Basically anything which causes DNA damage can provide it with a configuration which makes for a benefit to the species.

quoting Anon Astrophysicist ---> "dna is damaged by ionization radiation the result is either death of the cell or reproduction of useless cells."

that depends on the dose, fuckstick.
we are damaged by ionising radiation everyday, all the fucking time and we repair it. that's what we do. the body invests a lot of resources doing so. if the dose is big enough then yeah, the cell or organism fucking dies or is tarded. if the dose is small the cells repair themselves.

The point being that it is about DOSE and if the cells receiving the radiation are your regular somatic cells or if they are germline cells or cells directly used in the creation of the next generation of organism. These two things make the difference. I don't think you understand correctly what you are talking about. And to claim so boldly on here that you do is quite frankly fucking bizarre. If you are actually employed by a facility for your scientific skills they should have a look at your work on here just so they know exactly what they are paying for.

Quote from the first thing that came up on google search:

"Hence a Co-ordinated Research Project on In
vitro Techniques for Selection of Radiation Induced Mutations Adapted to Adverse
Environmental Conditions was initiated and focused primarily on the improvement of
vegetatively propagated plants.
Mutation techniques in combination with tissue culture methods provide a powerful
technology to improve clonally propagated plants. The in vitro culture of vegetatively
propagated crops in combination with radiation induced mutations has proven to be an
invaluable method to produce desired variation and to rapidly multiply the selected mutants and
parental material in a disease-free condition. It is possible to upgrade well established clones by
changing specific traits by inducing mutations. The availability of large populations for
mutagenesis is one of the basic per-requisites to obtain sufficient variation. The in vitro
techniques provide the mechanism to generate large populations for mutation induction,
selection and rapid multiplication of the selected mutants."

[link to mvgs.iaea.org]



What I have learned from this interaction, Anonymous Astrophysicist, is that if you are going off about things here to do with mutations and evolution that I know for a FACT you are incorrect about, I know that you cannot be trusted to be giving the correct information about other areas of science I am not so enlightened about.

In other words, you are bullshit.

Do you actually have any qualifications? And if you do you need to brush up on your biology. And it does seem to me that you have delusions, because any professional reading this shit would be able to see the errors in your science and would not be 'OMG hanging off every word this guy says'. They are not calling you crazy because they are afraid of your (TRUTH! I SPEAK TRUTH, INFIDELS!) mate they are saying it because it looks to be true.

you have managed to alienate quite a few posters here who have a good scientific underpinning. well done.