Debunk this please.

Astromut, you are a shill. I never saw you trying so hard to debunk something so hard before. Filter flare :::::)))))))

do you people really give astor shill the time of day?

LMFAO! It's a thread all about a video you wanted me to debunk, it had nothing to do with me being correct about Venus. Perhaps that was your implied pretense for making the thread, but given your reaction to my debunking, clearly it's a callout thread.

I did nothing of the sort. It's clearly in front of the clouds which is why it does not illuminate the clouds from behind, nor is its light diffused by the cloud, after the sun emerges from the cloud at 1:24-1:33.

Then all I can say is this:

Once a shill, always a shill.

Anybody can go watch that video and see it appear behind the clouds.

If you can't see that, then you're not looking hard enough.

It does.

You can deny it all you want, but it only makes you look like an idiot/shill.

I only speak the truth astromut, I wouldn't call you a liar if you had actually proven it doesn't go behind the clouds. It does, and just because you say it doesn't, doesn't make it any less factual.

I don't need to convince you. Your opinion is, simply that, your opinion. I know what I see, and hopefully everybody else will look for themselves, rather than following your ignorance blindly.

Last Edited by ****D4RK*ST4R**** on 05/17/2012 02:37 PM

Well, I will admit I'm a closet Nibirutard, as I sure am hoping there's some other wandering planet out there that might spell doom for the Earth.

But my hope really is based on historical record and interpretation, mainly from the Summerian and Babylonian artifacts that show some interesting depictions. Perhaps the interpretation of those artifacts can be debunked but the artifacts cannot.

Those Summerians knew something we don't really know today.

Somebody Please, get a video with the finger in front of da stupid sun. Im betting the object in question will still be seen.

Only if the conditions are right.

I sure would like to see such a video, just to prove one way or another, then we can all move along.

What "if" this plantoid or nibiru is under intelligent control and being steered? Hiding itself behind other planets or objects.. i heard ryecently there is a massive object hiding behind a planet as of recent

You resort to ad hominem again, attack my integrity, meanwhile...
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

And again you make claims but you do not provide proof.

You make more claims, but I did prove that it's in front of the clouds, not behind them. I have to say it was quite amusing to watch you contradictorily claim earlier that it looked like it was behind the cloud and like it was in front of the cloud. Can't be both, and the proof at 1:24-1:33 shows it's actually in front of the cloud.

I said it appears to be in front of the clouds at some point, but that it is clearly shown behind the clouds earlier.

Did you not understand me the first 6 times I said that?

People think Astromut 'wins' the argument. He never does, he simply outlasts his opponent and the threads die.

That is not a win.

But what about the evidence:



See the image, it's behind the cloud.

Need to see proof of then 3600 year orbit Astro. Im just saying if you want to call people out on evidence and proof. Well..... I think the whole problem is NASA is no honest and lies to us. Therefore we are incline to believe theories to NASA and their supports trues.

Just wonder why do you want to post on this forum and dont believe in Doom and anthing. It just like you want to ruin someones day or spread mis info. Just a note. Im not saying your right or wrong but the whole BETTER than you post is what is pissing everyone off.

Jmman

I've noticed that too.

Where most people would quit in frustration, especially if they believed it wasn't worth their time, he'll continue on ranting the same sentences over and over, until most people give up out of frustration.

I'm not going anywhere Astro, you can bet on that.

So, keep on regurgitating the same bullshit. You can't debunk an undeniable fact.

Last Edited by ****D4RK*ST4R**** on 05/17/2012 02:54 PM

It is an image of the sun, dimmed through internal reflections in the camera. It shows that the upper left part of the Sun is partially covered by a cloud.

Look dude...you change the thread title again?....it's gone...

Things do not get better from that point forward...and that will not be debunked, you can bank on it...

Last Edited by SHR on 05/17/2012 02:56 PM

you read my mind and wrote it down thank you. I read a few pages back astronut saying he knows more in astronomy than the sumerians did, ROFL

He debunked himself a few times, a bluzer

I disgagree, but thank you for your contribution.

No, I didn't.

Stop messing with me, I didn't change the title!

Does it show who last edited it?

I KNOW I didn't!

EDIT

So why edit it, SHR?

Is it because you know I'm on to something?

Thanks for that, I don't need a shill on my thread title anyways.

Last Edited by ****D4RK*ST4R**** on 05/17/2012 03:02 PM

Do not make callout threads like I said...and if I see the original title back again?...this will end badly...

I only edited it to make a point, as I said. I won't change it back, you don't have to worry about that.

That being said, don't threaten me. I haven't done anything wrong. As I said, this wasn't intended to be a callout thread, I honestly wanted an intellectual discussion, however, that doesn't seem possible with Astromut.

What is your opinion SHR?

Last Edited by ****D4RK*ST4R**** on 05/17/2012 03:07 PM

Dude, that's what Nibiru is supposed to be, that's the claim. If you want to change the claim then that's changing horses, but Nibiru is said to have a 3600 year orbit. Words have meaning, even if they are bunk theories. If you change the meaning at will then the word becomes meaningless and worthless.

I've answered this a million times before. Just because I don't subscribe to bullshit doesn't mean I have no business being here. Besides, if I ever do discover something doomy, this forum is my automatic "panic button." One post and thousands of people will instantly know and word will spread like friggen wild fire.

Op....what is your opinion on this nibiru being under intelligent control potentially ? This is uuwhat i believe

It is in front of the clouds, you assumed it was behind earlier in the video, but from the point that the sun has fully emerged onwards it's indisputable that it's in front of the clouds, not behind them. It's easy to see why you thought it went behind the clouds; the clouds were saturating the pixels, thus they drowned out the filter flare, but once the sun emerged and stopped backlighting the cloud, the filter flare is seen to be in front of the clouds, not behind them. 1:24-1:33, the filter flare shows a hard edge, does not illuminate the cloud, and its brightness is not diffused by the cloud at all. It's super-imposed on top of the cloud. That is mutually exclusive with the claim that it was behind the clouds rather than in front of them.

Well, I'm not exactly convinced of such a theory. However, I'm not one to discount anything until proven otherwise.

Thread: That video seems to be getting the most interest, but what about the OTHER video?

No, it was clearly seen behind the clouds, and it was while both the sun and object were behind the clouds. They were both behind the clouds, and the object can still be seen BEHIND the clouds.

Excuse me? I've been nothing but patient with you, even after you started insulting me and calling me a shill. If you wanted an intellectual discussion you wouldn't be treating me the way you are. People who want to have intellectual discussions back up their claims with proof and don't resort to personal insults and attacks.

Again, you just make claims but you provide no proof. It's just your unsupported opinion. I provided detailed proof of why I know it's in front of the clouds, not behind them.

So, how would you respond to ignorance?

The object clearly goes behind the clouds!