Carbon Dating is only accurate if they don't know the Actual Age | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1222180 United States 06/01/2012 08:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15526347 United States 06/01/2012 09:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17131873 United Kingdom 06/01/2012 09:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17131873 United Kingdom 06/01/2012 09:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Living snails that carbon-date to 2,300 years old, a living seal that was carbon-dated at 1,300 years old, and 8,000-year-old living penguins. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501 Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time? Oooh, a Youtube clip....I'm sure science is trembling in its boots...... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17118059 United Kingdom 06/01/2012 09:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15526347 United States 06/01/2012 09:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LOL to anyone who thinks there is actually some sure fire way to accurately measure the age of something thousands of + years old. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15526347 If you don't know its age how can you say it's "thousands of years old"? DUH! Hmm let me take a guess, scientists engage in a lot of supposition, and make sure they only get "evidence" that supports their suppositions? Nah can't be, scientists are super intelligent super men who never engage in such human foibles. |
Instant Karma User ID: 1025379 United States 06/01/2012 09:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My only experience with carbon-dating was taking that lump of coal to dinner and a show. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1222180 Some day that lump of coal will be a diamond. Dollar Deception: How Banks Secretly Create Money: [link to www.webofdebt.com] ALTERED GENES, TWISTED TRUTH: How the Venture to Genetically Engineer Our Food Has Subverted Science, Corrupted Government, and Systematically Deceived the Public: [link to www.amazon.com] 2028 End? [link to 2028end.com] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 6733501 Russia 06/01/2012 09:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17116182 Germany 06/01/2012 09:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501 I'm afraid first you have to get a Master of Science or at least do the equal amount of reading... :/ Here's the forumla for your question: [link to en.wikipedia.org] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 6733501 Russia 06/01/2012 09:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501 I'm afraid first you have to get a Master of Science or at least do the equal amount of reading... :/ Here's the forumla for your question: [link to en.wikipedia.org] You mean a Master of Indoctrination. I don't need a piece of paper to tell me that Carbon Dating is absurd. Science = House of Cards |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17116182 Germany 06/01/2012 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1510025 Australia 06/01/2012 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17116182 Germany 06/01/2012 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm afraid first you have to get a Master of Science or at least do the equal amount of reading... :/ Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501 Here's the formula for your question: [link to en.wikipedia.org] You mean a Master of Indoctrination. I don't need a piece of paper to tell me that Carbon Dating is absurd. Science = House of Cards . Okay then. Explain to me what you just read... |
Six Six Six User ID: 3753361 United States 06/01/2012 09:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is a very interesting concept. I agree... the fact that they "CLAIM" to be able to know the age of something thousands and millions of years old... based on science that is barely 100 years old... is quite a claim. I don't care what they say... if you really think about it.... it makes no sense whatsoever. Last Edited by Six Six Six on 06/01/2012 09:16 PM Biko |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17118059 United Kingdom 06/01/2012 09:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Six Six Six User ID: 3753361 United States 06/01/2012 09:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17118059 United Kingdom 06/01/2012 09:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
walker8989 User ID: 12172181 United States 06/01/2012 09:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14588485 United Kingdom 06/01/2012 09:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Who uses Carbon dating any more? There are loads of methods and Carbon dating has limitations, not flaws. So many stupid people who think they know it all, do you know about all the other ways that are more commonly used? Science, it works! |
Six Six Six User ID: 3753361 United States 06/01/2012 09:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17118059 United Kingdom 06/01/2012 09:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16735882 Australia 06/01/2012 09:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10081490 United States 06/01/2012 09:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Daniel's Seventieth Seven User ID: 1071051 United States 06/01/2012 09:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | . If a large cosmic-ray bombardment impacted the earth and irradiated the prehistoric landscape with thermal neutrons, the 235 U/238 U ratio would be changed; 239 Pu would be produced from neutron capture on 238 U, followed by the decay of 239 U. Neutrons colliding with nitrogen (1.83 barns) would create 14 C in exactly the same way 14 C is normally produced in the upper atmosphere, necessarily resetting the radiocarbon dates of any organic materials lying near the surface on the North American prehistoric landscape—including charcoals at Paleoindian sites—to younger values. 239 Pu produced during the bombardment will also be partly destroyed by thermal neutrons with 1017 barn cross section. Assuming 239 Pu doesn’t mobilize, it will decay back to 235 U (half-life 24,110 yr), partially restoring the normal abundance. [link to abob.libs.uga.edu] Thread: The sun is reacting to forces that can’t be seen. As requested, we will now “show” them to you and explain NIBIRU, PLANET X, and WORMWOOD. ^^ |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17175009 Hong Kong 06/01/2012 09:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
UDontKnow User ID: 17175846 United States 06/01/2012 09:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16851279 Canada 06/01/2012 10:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
strgzr User ID: 4478757 United States 06/01/2012 10:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Living snails that carbon-date to 2,300 years old, a living seal that was carbon-dated at 1,300 years old, and 8,000-year-old living penguins. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6733501 Tell me this scientists... how do you know the half-life of carbon has remained a constant variable throughout time? Moron. :) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4223094 United States 06/01/2012 10:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3650237 United States 06/01/2012 10:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |