My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5562120 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 03:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | explain this, this and this. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5562120 with 100% closed logic, no room for error. [link to bp3.blogger.com] [link to bp0.blogger.com] [link to i50.tinypic.com] remember no room for error, why no tracks and why are the tracks bigger than the craters?? BINGO. It's just impossible to have footprints BELLOW the machine - right where wheels have crossed over. your making too much sense, before we know it they will send a shill in to start saying the van allen belts will stop anyone going to the moon and another one to say the opposite just to sidetrack the whole thread again. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5562120 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 03:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | explain this, this and this. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5562120 with 100% closed logic, no room for error. [link to bp3.blogger.com] [link to bp0.blogger.com] [link to i50.tinypic.com] remember no room for error, why no tracks and why are the tracks bigger than the craters?? I would like to hear this explained... I will never believe we landed on the moon, I don't care what anyone say's. If something doesn't make sense... IT'S A LIE! no will will explain it, you will only get half baked explanations, then ignored. |
jay-j User ID: 21807198 United States 08/12/2012 03:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11696035 Canada 08/12/2012 03:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Think about it this way: most people back then believed an old man living on a ottoman in the clouds was supreme creator of everything. They believed whatever the TV said. They believed their pastor. No fucking wonder they'd believe this one too. So deluded in their insulated cocoon of lies. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21780518 Croatia 08/12/2012 03:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | if it was that easy to go to the moon why didn't the russians or chinese do it? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21797477 The Russians tried. They had an active program until 1974 but they couldn't keep their heavy lifting booster from exploding. The Chinese have only recently gotten to space. Without Russians and their well known rocket technology you and your astromauts would be sitting at home today staring at the stars, or watching Star-trek dreaming how to build warp O FFS why do you even bother? Does wernher von braun sound Russian to you? No, it's sounds like this when nazi (and Disney) died American lost idea how to send people to the Moon |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13672072 United States 08/12/2012 03:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow. Quoting: nzreva In the video 6min 20 secs interview General Walters dies, at 85, in the night after a French interview that was going to expose details about the first moon walk, it was scheduled for the next day he did not survive the night. 6min 20 secs into video [link to mountzion144.ning.com] share_post Listen to what the New York Herald tribune says in the video. More [link to thebodyofjesusthenazoraion.com] Something that is real will have little to no discrepancies. The reality will speak for itself. Something that is faked will have too many discrepancies to count. Such as the photo count, diffused light in the photos, Van Allen radiation belts, Direct Solar radiation, micro meteors, etc, etc.. I don't even bother trying to point out the evidence regarding the - too numerous to count - discrepancies of the moon landings to people in conversation. Same goes with 911, too many discrepancies to count but yet people defend the "official" story with extreme zeal. Sad really. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21594154 Portugal 08/12/2012 03:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Still waiting for an answer for these images: [link to bp3.blogger.com] [link to bp0.blogger.com] [link to i50.tinypic.com] and the most intriguing one - clouds in top left... in the moon? [link to 2.bp.blogspot.com] C'mon people - explain away! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5562120 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 03:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Think about it this way: most people back then believed an old man living on a ottoman in the clouds was supreme creator of everything. They believed whatever the TV said. They believed their pastor. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11696035 No fucking wonder they'd believe this one too. So deluded in their insulated cocoon of lies. they hold onto the lie with despair as they realise the rest of their lives fall apart if they think about it too much. a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie built on a lie.... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21594154 Portugal 08/12/2012 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5562120 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow. Quoting: nzreva In the video 6min 20 secs interview General Walters dies, at 85, in the night after a French interview that was going to expose details about the first moon walk, it was scheduled for the next day he did not survive the night. 6min 20 secs into video [link to mountzion144.ning.com] share_post Listen to what the New York Herald tribune says in the video. More [link to thebodyofjesusthenazoraion.com] Something that is real will have little to no discrepancies. The reality will speak for itself. Something that is faked will have too many discrepancies to count. Such as the photo count, diffused light in the photos, Van Allen radiation belts, Direct Solar radiation, micro meteors, etc, etc.. I don't even bother trying to point out the evidence regarding the - too numerous to count - discrepancies of the moon landings to people in conversation. Same goes with 911, too many discrepancies to count but yet people defend the "official" story with extreme zeal. Sad really. dont you find it strange that the people who defend somethign with the most anger are the ones who have never lifted a finger to research anything about it. maybe its a natural human response when realising something is a lie and they believed it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5562120 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 03:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Still waiting for an answer for these images: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154 [link to bp3.blogger.com] [link to bp0.blogger.com] [link to i50.tinypic.com] and the most intriguing one - clouds in top left... in the moon? [link to 2.bp.blogspot.com] C'mon people - explain away! lmao, just wait until you turn the contrast up and see what its the background... haah you will love that one. best to get an original pic and do it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10902255 Mexico 08/12/2012 03:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21594154 Portugal 08/12/2012 03:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Still waiting for an answer for these images: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154 [link to bp3.blogger.com] [link to bp0.blogger.com] [link to i50.tinypic.com] and the most intriguing one - clouds in top left... in the moon? [link to 2.bp.blogspot.com] C'mon people - explain away! lmao, just wait until you turn the contrast up and see what its the background... haah you will love that one. best to get an original pic and do it. which one? And where to get originals? |
Jane Burgermeister fan User ID: 15327956 Poland 08/12/2012 03:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's more important today: check the new video "Jane Burgermeister - economy and financial update" [link to www.youtube.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21810244 Panama 08/12/2012 03:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow. Quoting: nzreva In the video 6min 20 secs interview General Walters dies, at 85, in the night after a French interview that was going to expose details about the first moon walk, it was scheduled for the next day he did not survive the night. 6min 20 secs into video [link to mountzion144.ning.com] share_post Listen to what the New York Herald tribune says in the video. More [link to thebodyofjesusthenazoraion.com] Something that is real will have little to no discrepancies. The reality will speak for itself. Something that is faked will have too many discrepancies to count. Such as the photo count, diffused light in the photos, Van Allen radiation belts, Direct Solar radiation, micro meteors, etc, etc.. I don't even bother trying to point out the evidence regarding the - too numerous to count - discrepancies of the moon landings to people in conversation. Same goes with 911, too many discrepancies to count but yet people defend the "official" story with extreme zeal. Sad really. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21594154 Portugal 08/12/2012 03:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Still waiting for an answer for these images: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154 [link to bp3.blogger.com] [link to bp0.blogger.com] [link to i50.tinypic.com] and the most intriguing one - clouds in top left... in the moon? [link to 2.bp.blogspot.com] C'mon people - explain away! No one can explain these images? Ouch. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5562120 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 03:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Still waiting for an answer for these images: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154 [link to bp3.blogger.com] [link to bp0.blogger.com] [link to i50.tinypic.com] and the most intriguing one - clouds in top left... in the moon? [link to 2.bp.blogspot.com] C'mon people - explain away! lmao, just wait until you turn the contrast up and see what its the background... haah you will love that one. best to get an original pic and do it. which one? And where to get originals? see the numbers at the top left of the pics, google them and pic a nasa site.. im not saying you will see something in those but pic some at random and see what you find in the 'black' of space when you turn the contrast up also here is a higher quality apollo 15 rover image notice the lack of tracks here and the boot marks clearly infront and behind the wheels [link to upload.wikimedia.org] upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ed/Apollo15LunarRover.jpg |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21810244 Panama 08/12/2012 04:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I personally think NASA lied about this to gain "street credit", for make them look bad ass for Russia. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154 Now, all these years after, we KNOW they're a bunch of political liars. USA & Russian leaders colluded to fleece the people. The cold war was a scam, fake enemies created fear, spent billions, lined their pockets with kickbacks. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21810244 Panama 08/12/2012 04:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Still waiting for an answer for these images: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154 [link to bp3.blogger.com] [link to bp0.blogger.com] [link to i50.tinypic.com] and the most intriguing one - clouds in top left... in the moon? [link to 2.bp.blogspot.com] C'mon people - explain away! No one can explain these images? Ouch. Shills caught with their pants down. |
Copperhead User ID: 17170892 United States 08/12/2012 04:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fubarman, it is time for another dose of.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21753384 That will keep you asleep. I suggest you watch at least 3 times per day. Again another poster who could not refute my facts....yawn how boring. sorry fubar I will have to go with Kubrick's Widow on this one You will, even though the admission that her interview was on a mockumentary.. Just goes to show folks will believe what they want in the face of blinding facts. Please read this factoid and wake up... [link to en.wikipedia.org] Even Rammstein knows the truth. [link to www.youtube.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21810244 Panama 08/12/2012 04:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonimous Cowerd User ID: 1248699 United States 08/12/2012 04:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21810244 Panama 08/12/2012 04:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | explain this, this and this. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5562120 with 100% closed logic, no room for error. [link to bp3.blogger.com] [link to bp0.blogger.com] [link to i50.tinypic.com] remember no room for error, why no tracks and why are the tracks bigger than the craters?? BINGO. It's just impossible to have footprints BELLOW the machine - right where wheels have crossed over. your making too much sense, before we know it they will send a shill in to start saying the van allen belts will stop anyone going to the moon and another one to say the opposite just to sidetrack the whole thread again. Myth busters debunked that already. You are delusional if you think we didn't go to the moon. Take your meds. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19117826 United States 08/12/2012 04:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21810244 Panama 08/12/2012 04:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11696035 Canada 08/12/2012 04:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21780518 Croatia 08/12/2012 04:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Still waiting for an answer for these images: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154 [link to bp3.blogger.com] [link to bp0.blogger.com] [link to i50.tinypic.com] and the most intriguing one - clouds in top left... in the moon? [link to 2.bp.blogspot.com] C'mon people - explain away! OMG OMG THIS IS THE KEEPER!!!!!!!!!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21812760 Panama 08/12/2012 04:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Could it at least be possible that we did go to the moon, but that they also wanted to have better footage, so they hired Kubrick to give us this footage too? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19117826 The only way Nixon would approve televising the mission on live TV is if he knew 100% that it would be successful. The only way to guarantee success is to FAKE IT. When you read about all the failed testing, astronauts dying, equipment break downs, etc. the odds of success were almost zero. The mission was televised because it was faked. |
Skeptic the First User ID: 21309323 United States 08/12/2012 04:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | lol, went to the moon. just walked straight through the van allen belts like it's nothing. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21797477 Here is James Van Allen's own view of the Apollo "moon landings": [link to www.nytimes.com] --- Dr. Van Allen said Apollo was of primary value as a television spectacular, rather than for its scientific achievements. --- |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21780384 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 04:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |