GLP brainiacs: Help. Question on quantum mechanics. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24885688 United Kingdom 10/03/2012 11:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The answer to your question is yes & no. All states exist in equilibrium until the wave function collapses. This is not one Universe, neither is it a multi-verse. It is Omniverse, where all possibilities exist in all states in infinite Universes simultaneously within the same temporal sphere. Feel lucky? Overcrowded? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21963969 United States 10/03/2012 11:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
SevenThunders User ID: 15851599 United States 10/03/2012 11:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.bbc.co.uk] There was another paper that seemed to question the observer effect, and bring things closer to common sense with regards to how observation effects the world. Unfortunately I can't find the reference right now. With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24885688 United Kingdom 10/03/2012 11:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In the correct state of consciousness, that also is accurate. And steerable, *ahem* allegedly. Strange that we would all choose to be here right now though huh? Pretty sure my ticket never said 'shithole - one way'! |
CrazyEyesThreadKilla (OP) User ID: 14327039 United States 10/03/2012 11:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Assuming this is true, does it mean a) the ACT of perception alters reality (e.g. a camera and a person watching have the same effect) b) The nature of the perceiver as he is perceiving alters reality (e.g. a camera would have a different effect than a person or a different person) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21963969 United States 10/04/2012 12:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Assuming this is true, does it mean a) the ACT of perception alters reality (e.g. a camera and a person watching have the same effect) b) The nature of the perceiver as he is perceiving alters reality (e.g. a camera would have a different effect than a person or a different person) yes and yes |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23494157 United States 10/04/2012 12:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Agent Tray User ID: 24795235 United States 10/04/2012 12:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | <iframe width="420" height="315" src=" [link to www.youtube.com] frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real world? |
Agent Tray User ID: 24795235 United States 10/04/2012 12:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24924823 United States 10/04/2012 12:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Assuming this is true, does it mean a) the ACT of perception alters reality (e.g. a camera and a person watching have the same effect) b) The nature of the perceiver as he is perceiving alters reality (e.g. a camera would have a different effect than a person or a different person) What is this reality you speak of? Can you give me a short explanation of it, or bottled up and easy to examine? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22894284 Canada 10/04/2012 12:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They are looking at the veil too closely and seeing between the fibres into the other side, thinking they can grab it, but their minds only grasp at it with the curtain over their hands, because their insturments are not penetrating the barrier. |