Must See: Crude oil now covers much of giant sinkhole — Flowing into surrounding area (ENHANCED PHOTO)

a picture tells a thousand words.

Why isn't this shit pinned...?????

Suggest pin- Thanks op

5* and SP. Can't wait to see the official explanation for that.

...I'm so ashamed of humanity.

Is that picture showing a surface current?

wow...good catch OP...

Why are they not collecting it? There's a road right to it, suction trucks should be lined up with transfer to on site tanker trucks, some on is missing their royality payment on this......

Meanwhile.....

How about we start with you?

Im ready to leave this god foresaken place. If you would like to assist my suicide, please you are welcome in my home anyday.

Now someone needs to check it's FINGERPRINT and see if there is a match with the unweathered crude coming out of the MACONDO WELL!

that was my next question is it from BP oil spill Macondo?

The explanation is, it's coming from natural sources and they do not know how to stop it.

[link to www.youtube.com]



Last Edited by alexisj9 on 10/13/2012 09:15 PM

MODS thanks!

This...is probably not a positive development.

Time to call in the US Corps of Engineers and have the military handle whatever can be done. This mess will end up across state boundaries and is likely directly affected by the BP foul of the Gulf of Mexico.

* * * * *

"Section 404 of the Clean Water Act established a regulatory program for the disposal of dredged or fill materials in the waters and wetlands of the United States. This section is regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers with EPA oversight. Much debate and litigation has occurred over what constitutes "waters and wetlands of the United States". The following definition is used to administer the Section 404 permit program:

"...those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas."

Broad River Under Section 404, an exemption exists for silvicultural (i.e. timber management), farming or ranching activities. In order to meet the silvicultural exemption, the activity must be a normal, ongoing silvicultural activity that will not convert a wetlands to an upland site. The activity must also comply with best management practices guidelines for forested wetlands. A written management plan or evidence of historical use will help to demonstrate if it is an ongoing activity.

The EPA has a very narrow definition of normal silviculture. EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers consider only timber management as silviculture. If the activity is for wildlife management, recreation, etc., it will not qualify under this exemption.

Landowners who wish to implement practices in jurisdictional wetlands that are not for timber management, need to contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to see if a permit may be required. Even if the practice is for timber management and it is going to impact a jurisdictional wetlands, it MUST be performed in compliance with best management practices to remain exempt.

Non-exempt activities may qualify under U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' nationwide permits. These permits have been established for a number of activities that have minimal impacts on wetlands. Nationwide permits were designed to regulate these activities with little, if any, delay or paperwork. If the activity does not qualify for authorization under a nationwide permit, it may still be authorized by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers by an individual or regional general permit."

[link to www.state.sc.us]

Not good, not good at all...

Somebody mind telling me what all this is about? I've been seeing the threads, but have not been bothering with them...my mistake. Anyone willing to catch me up a bit with some cliff notes or something?

The BP GOM oils spill accident has found it's way out through Louisianan's Boyou Corne. Next comes the ocean.

.


Hey Barack -- thanks for the oil slick!


Clean Water Act - Section 311
(A) If a discharge, or a substantial threat of a discharge,
of oil or a hazardous substance from a vessel, offshore
facility, or onshore facility is of such a size or
character as to be a substantial threat to the public
health or welfare of the United States (including but not
limited to fish, shellfish, wildlife, other natural
resources, and the public and private beaches and
shorelines of the United States), the President shall
direct all Federal, State, and private actions to
remove the discharge or to mitigate or prevent the threat
of the discharge.





.

I actally heard on NBC the other day that the Gulf 'spill' is 'leaking' again. I don't think it ever stopped but, they are seeing slicks on the gulf again.

Don't let Biden hear or see this, he will laugh so hard he might have a heart attack.

They think it's just oil? Looks like a toxic soup to me....

This is fucking ridiculous....where is the media...where is the administration?

They need top match that oil to the BP Macondo Oil spill see if they match.

BP nuked a fault line . . . the repercussions are playing out.

A retired engineer discovered a techtonic plate under the Louisiana Bayou and that a previously believed dorman pocket of gas under the GOM is actually active . . . all that is the link up to New Madrid Seismic Zone which is literally covered with a maze of natural gas pipelines and nuclear plants nearby.

BP runs the Energy Department of U.S.

They need top match that oil to the BP Macondo Oil spill see if they match.