Moontard here: THE friggin MOON is NOT RIGHT!

Hi OP, TrinityMountain, Saint Leibowitz, Chas, donnamickey, ~Spaze*Man~, waxonwaxoff, LordBeagle72, Em18966, Possum, Kissplash, The Answer, grefey and all the ACs.

Its day now in Australia, Europe, and all over the USA.

Did someone get up early morning to look at the moon at dawn?

Could I fix it?
Was it waning from right to left instead of top to bottom?

I am stretched to the breaking point - please tell me if I could fix it.



.

Don't worry...real karma will be returned to you. You can thank me later!

I noticed this too, last night. Very strange. Is it possible that the moon was bombarded by something (an asteroid, etc) that was large enough to knock it out of its normal orbit? If that is the case, could the moon's new orbit slam it into the earth, destroying us all?

AHHHHH!!!!!

So what's up?

You didn't get up early morning or you realised that you made a fool of yourself?


.

I saw that the other day too .. (in S. FL) .. and was like "huh, I don't remember the moon waning from the top" ..

LoL .. I love when I'm not the only crazy one ..

Wet moon.....Look it up. Happens this time EVERY year.

Hey I am 46 and you are correct.
If people would just get calendars from the past when the moon use to be a real quarter moon like this---> ( and so on. not a frown quarter moon.
The moon has changed and it seems like it started a few years ago.
I can not be specific when it changed to what it is today.
They blamed it on the winter soltrace or some kind of shit and said it would return to the way it was after the winter soltrace shit was over but it never happened.
The moon has never looked like it does today.
Just look at a calender and look at the times it says there will be a quarter moon and so on.
None of the pics on the calendars look like our moon today.
Signs in the moons?
End times?
In my opinion= yes.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Sadly the experts don't respond to all this BS. But I can't blaim them, so much ignorence in one thread, it's hilarious.

I recommend you all to read "Astronomy for Dummies".

You couldn't be more wrong.. The Wet Moon only happens in THE WINTER in the Northern Hemisphere..Between January and February.. This wet moon has been around for the past 3 years, even during the summer months.. I mean how fucking stupid do you think we are? And don't give me that "If the moon was fucked up, thousands if not millions of amateur astronomers would be saying something about it"

WELL, HERE THE FUCK WE ARE SAYING SOMETHING ABOUT IT! Assholes..

"The terms wet moon and dry moon originate from Hawaiian mythology, where it was thought that the moon appeared as a bowl which would fill up with rain. The period where this is most common, January 20 - February 18, corresponds with Kaelo the Water Bearer in Hawaiian astrology and makes the moon known as the "dripping wet moon". As the year passes into summer, the crescent shape shifts, pouring out the water and causing the summer rains. After the "bowl" empties, it dries out and rights itself, creating the "dry moon"."

I mean, at least do research on your own assumptions before spreading bullshit and looking like a complete fucking fool.

Are you fucking retarded?

From your own link!

"The terms wet moon and dry moon originate from Hawaiian mythology, where it was thought that the moon appeared as a bowl which would fill up with rain. The period where this is most common, January 20 - February 18, corresponds with Kaelo the Water Bearer in Hawaiian astrology and makes the moon known as the "dripping wet moon". As the year passes into summer, the crescent shape shifts, pouring out the water and causing the summer rains. After the "bowl" empties, it dries out and rights itself, creating the "dry moon"."

January and February are not THIS TIME EVERY YEAR!

Probably because this happens every year.....Its getting old. Sigh.

Not going to even bother anymore with this, type of response.....Getting really old after all these years. Kinda sad when I think about it.

Hey fucktard.. I proved your theory wrong.. Using your own reference, at that..

Ahh so, you have been proven wrong with your own fucking source, so now you can't be bothered with this? What the fuck does it say in your link? Between January and February! READ IT FUCKHOLE!

This is NOT January, nor is it February, It's fucking November!

Yes, you should hide your face.. Clown..

Do you think this is REAL cause of earthquakes?

Number one: I couldn't see it if I tried today...clouds were along the back of my house and I live in the city. And whether or not I make a fool out of myself to you, family or friends, or strangers matters not to me.

Number two: I never said anything negative about anything you said on this thread so why worry about said karma? Guilty much? ummhummmm.

Number three: The only thing I did was question your pic in which you never answered any of my questions. If you're upset about that you're being kind of weird. I wouldn't be upset if I put my pics out and no one cared as I do it whenever time allows. I would care even less if I didn't take the photo.

Number four: Maybe I'll give out some good karma today to people who need it. Because what goes around, comes around. And I'm a good person despite all you may think. You don't know me. And at this point maybe that's best because the true nature of a person is found in the way they talk to a stranger.

This shills get called out, proven to be full of shit, and then the thread gets buried?

My question to the Moon-Tards:


Your answer:

I think it's not an answer to my question.

This is a better one:






Did I? - Show me where I did.



Oh, I thought you made rhetorical questions.
But I'm pleased to answer: Look below the photo. And yes, in 1910 they already had artificial light.



Nice move.



You can read my mind?



Wise words - do they apply to you too?


Let's go back to number three:

Really?

Ooops.


.

Again my question:


The answers:
Kissplash: Cloudy and no moon visible - sad but OK.


How about the rest of you?
Estonia, Spain, UK, USA - all cloudy?


.

Last Edited by Hydra on 11/06/2012 10:11 AM

I noticed it too, the moon, as viewed from Northern California was waning from the top down not from the side. I don't recall ever seeing it like that before. My viewing angle was looking due East and slightly north .move was moving from northeast to southwesterly direction .

Perhaps it always does this in late October early nov? I dunno...
Time to pull out some OLD encyclopedias that NASA hasn't edited....

Oh really? Did you not look at the moon at dawn this morning? If you had, you would have realized the "shills" were right.

Field rotation is not dependent on the season. And yes, field rotation was described long before NASA was founded. Here's a reference from 1900:
[link to adsabs.harvard.edu]
Siderostats and heliostats do not use polar alignment and are therefore subject to field rotation. So are you when you're viewing the moon by eye. This problem is eliminated in a polar aligned telescope and indeed the moon is seen to be waning from the side, not from the top, in such a telescope.

You're a dumbass. NOBODY accused anyone of faking the photo 40 years ago. But, it would certainly be possible to take an old photo like that TODAY and use computer software to take a vertical crescent moon and tilt it to be hiorizontal. That's what I contend happened here. Your shill tactics of setting up an absurd accusation that nobody made won't work here wher epeople can think critically. Go take your PTB paycheck and shill elsewhere asshole.

None of the pics on the calendars account for field rotation. Why should they show a sideways waning Moon when the amount it is rotated varies depending on the observer and the time observing? If it never looked like it does today then why did the ancient egyptians and shakespeare describe it?

Actually an angled moon can happen any time of year. Certain times of the year are more common for certain phases because the moon's orbit is angled with respect to the ecliptic. The observer's location and observation time also matter. The wet moon reference refers to an extreme amount of apparent rotation for a single phase.