UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2251942 United States 11/16/2012 07:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DblTapViper User ID: 23719187 United States 11/16/2012 07:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. a MAGNITUDE 7.5+ to 8.5+ NEXT WEEK NOVEMBER 25th Target Date for this next major quake window. Thread: MAJOR QUAKE WARNING ALERT Magnitude 7+ to 8+ imminent 1111 to 113 posted about that date almost 3 months ago as well mate So if you haven't seen all my videos let alone my quake warnings for ALL MAJOR quakes in 2012 and since i began posting quake warnings in 2011 thats now reached a 90% hit ratio just for MAJOR QUAKES, If you're interested and are able to understand the subject matter I present connected to Ancient Sacred Geometry with the Ley Lines of 188 I've discovered, I highly recommend checking them ALL out as I think you might find them very interesting to say the least. Now the thing is, If I lowered the magnitude to 6.0 to 6.5 as my windows ALL USED to be earlier this year, I'd have an almost 99% success rate for nearly EVERY LARGE to MAJOR quake thats occurred in 2012 not even to mention my accuracy in 2011. But since quakes 6.5 and under are more common now than ever, once you understand the stats and my warnings let alone all that I've presented in my videos, anyone that posts such warnings lower the parameter to including 6 to 6.5 quakes like that and uses that as a basis or measure to validate their work and/or predictions, is tainting their work or creating a false impression when taken in CONTEXT or totality. I think PG has some good information and I like some of his work, but I do have an issue with him claiming just "large quakes" under 6.5 add to his "portfolio" or merit of what he's claiming let alone the fact his warnings are NOT CLEARLY archived nor does he or anyone address what I've just explained especially since as I've also said, his work and predictions are based on other peoples research and information that I'm not seeing him give any credit to. But since you seem to be a supporter, I'm open to you helping me answer some of these questions or address some of my points. Are you predicting a 10plus quake? DblTapViper |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27898647 Peru 11/17/2012 06:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15782258 Belgium 11/17/2012 07:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. And it's not like he;s a prophet. He's not "seeing" a quake happen somewhere. He is simply saying such-and-such planets will be alligned on these days, so we'll see a quake of such-and-such a size. Quoting: Wash In other words, he is using good old astrology. there's an article that tied the electric/plasma universe into astrology and basic astronomy. it could 'predict' erratic behavior on a planetary scale, by looking at a discharge pattern from the sun out to the planets (serially); the discharge was predictable because of the angular relation between heavenly bodies. (can't find the article, sorry; it was once posted on sott) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27952181 Brazil 11/17/2012 07:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. Here are his upcoming predictions. See for your self if he's right. Quoting: Wash This was written on Oct 28th, and take a look at what he called for Nov 7-8. November 7-8: possible 7 plus November 13-14: 6.5 plus November 15-16: 6.5 plus November 20: 6 plus November 22-23: 6.5 plus November 28: 7 December 4-5: 7 plus December 11: 7 plus December 17-18: 8 plus December 21: 10 plus" November 14 = 6.1 2012/11/14 19:02:06 -29.157 -71.272 61.8 COQUIMBO, CHILE November 16 = 6.4 2012/11/16 18:12:40 49.269 155.472 29.1 KURIL ISLANDS That's NOT a 6.5 plus... |
hapless moran User ID: 1130234 United States 11/17/2012 09:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. Here are his upcoming predictions. See for your self if he's right. Quoting: Wash This was written on Oct 28th, and take a look at what he called for Nov 7-8. November 7-8: possible 7 plus November 13-14: 6.5 plus November 15-16: 6.5 plus November 20: 6 plus November 22-23: 6.5 plus November 28: 7 December 4-5: 7 plus December 11: 7 plus December 17-18: 8 plus December 21: 10 plus" November 14 = 6.1 2012/11/14 19:02:06 -29.157 -71.272 61.8 COQUIMBO, CHILE November 16 = 6.4 2012/11/16 18:12:40 49.269 155.472 29.1 KURIL ISLANDS That's NOT a 6.5 plus... The Kuril Islands was originally recorded as a 6.8 and later downgraded. TPTB downgraded it to discredit PG. free your inner baboon. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27889481 Belgium 11/17/2012 10:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. Here are his upcoming predictions. See for your self if he's right. Quoting: Wash This was written on Oct 28th, and take a look at what he called for Nov 7-8. November 7-8: possible 7 plus November 13-14: 6.5 plus November 15-16: 6.5 plus November 20: 6 plus November 22-23: 6.5 plus November 28: 7 December 4-5: 7 plus December 11: 7 plus December 17-18: 8 plus December 21: 10 plus" my goodness, if this comes true... At least you have Norway as a buffer. I'm in Nova Scotia facing the Atlantic. If a tsunami heads my way it's an hour to the nearest large ski hill. Yikes. If a tsunami is heading your way, you will be warned a long time in advance. Radio, TV, internet, you know. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27889481 Belgium 11/17/2012 10:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. Is it not easy to put out there 7.5 4.2 blah blah I would be more convinced with locations attached Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26365184 Now remember, he's making these predictions months in advance. I supose you might get lucky if you said...December 2nd 6.5 EQ. But, making a long string of predictions of various sizes and nailing them one after another...quite a bit more difficult. And it's not like he;s a prophet. He's not "seeing" a quake happen somewhere. He is simply saying such-and-such planets will be alligned on these days, so we'll see a quake of such-and-such a size. In other words, he is using good old astrology. hmm.. isnt that what the Mayans did? Yes and no. The Mayas were an ancient cultur who whorshipped divinities they associated with the heavenly bodies. Also, they had a different value system attached to them (i.e. Venus was felt to be a dangerous, blood-thirsty planet). Today's (or even 2000 year old) astrology does have theories about predicting the weather, earthquakes, etc; but this has nothing to do with divinities but with certain planets and their relative positions. I.e. Uranus and PLuto are believed to be instrumental in earthquakes (look it up, I might not be totally accurate), so if they are in square or opposition, you might expect something. But of course it's a lot more complex than that. I said PG must be using good old astrology as modern astronomy certainly doesn't accept any connection between earthly earthquakes and heavenly movements. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27889481 Belgium 11/17/2012 10:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. And it's not like he;s a prophet. He's not "seeing" a quake happen somewhere. He is simply saying such-and-such planets will be alligned on these days, so we'll see a quake of such-and-such a size. Quoting: Wash In other words, he is using good old astrology. there's an article that tied the electric/plasma universe into astrology and basic astronomy. it could 'predict' erratic behavior on a planetary scale, by looking at a discharge pattern from the sun out to the planets (serially); the discharge was predictable because of the angular relation between heavenly bodies. (can't find the article, sorry; it was once posted on sott) Sounds interesting, thanks. I might try to find it sometimes. Not right now as I have plenty things to keep me interested and busy. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26437981 United States 11/17/2012 10:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Solar Guardian User ID: 19279979 Malaysia 11/17/2012 10:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24266341 United States 11/18/2012 12:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. Regarding the possibility of a 10.0+ megaquake, the crazy thing about this is it's not a crazy prediction at all. In fact many scientists and geologists have speculated that such an event may have already happened on this planet if you look at how certain parts of this planet were formed. There have also been many shows on recently pretty much predicting an event like this to happen in our lifetimes, I think it was history channel who had a great show a few years back aptly named "10.0 megaquake" and talked about areas of the world where an event like this could happen. And sure enough they pointed to seismic hotspots like Chile, Cascadia, New Madrid, CA, and Japan. Even if a 10.0 quake happened in the middle of the ocean, it would still likely be an unprecedented event in that it would create a tsunami that the world has never seen. If it happened on land or offshore the effects would be devestating and casualties would be off the charts. Let's just hope we don't experience this in our lifetimes. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25613380 United States 11/18/2012 01:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. Here are his upcoming predictions. See for your self if he's right. Quoting: Wash This was written on Oct 28th, and take a look at what he called for Nov 7-8. November 7-8: possible 7 plus November 13-14: 6.5 plus November 15-16: 6.5 plus November 20: 6 plus November 22-23: 6.5 plus November 28: 7 December 4-5: 7 plus December 11: 7 plus December 17-18: 8 plus December 21: 10 plus" my goodness, if this comes true... At least you have Norway as a buffer. I'm in Nova Scotia facing the Atlantic. If a tsunami heads my way it's an hour to the nearest large ski hill. Yikes. If a tsunami is heading your way, you will be warned a long time in advance. Radio, TV, internet, you know. You mean like how the monitoring station in the Atlantic Ocean knew about that Boxing Day tsunami and told Indonesia? Not. |
Solar Guardian User ID: 19279979 Malaysia 11/18/2012 02:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15782258 Belgium 11/18/2012 03:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MatrixLNIN11 User ID: 20347511 United States 11/19/2012 07:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. If you look at the math on this there are 15 quakes a year 7.0 or bigger. That's one every 24 days. So with a two day window of prediction that gives you a one in 12 chance of being right just by random selection. Additionally, there are 7.0 + quakes that he is not predicting. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13806508 Then perhaps you should check out the warnings I've put out that have hit ALL 7+ mags in 2012 and even 2011. But either way, if you think its no big deal to pick a date for a MAJOR or M7+ and have one hit within 1-3 days over and over, LETS SEE YOU DO BETTER or show anyone that has. lol GOOD LUCK with that one! If you go below 7.0 there are 134 earthquakes a year between 6 and 6.9. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13806508 PLEASE SHOW PROOF for that CLAIM because your premise is FALSE. Lets see if you can figure out why. If you go with a two day window on those you have a 74 percent chance of being right just with random selection. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13806508 BULLSHIT. please support that claim with a far better evidenced-based argument. So far you're cherry-picking and skirting total context and actual evidence for each case. Of course the real test is the 10 that he's predicting for December. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13806508 We'll know soon enough. Now that i might agree with somewhat. I predict 8+ possible 9+ Either way though BIG QUAKE 7+ MINIMUM GUARANTEED but thats not including what might be described as a DIMENSIONAL SHIFT... which most technically won't even be aware of anyways. ;-) |
MatrixLNIN11 User ID: 20347511 United States 11/19/2012 09:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. On average the number of earthquakes that will strike each year include: 1 earthquake of magnitude 8 or larger; 17 earthquakes of magnitudes ranging from 7 to 7.9; 134 earthquakes of magnitudes ranging from 6 to 6.9; and 1,319 earthquakes of magnitudes 5 to 5.9. Quoting: doomie girl Statistically speaking we are still "due" another six 7-7.9 magnitude earthquakes in the next 7 wks…by the end of the year if we want to keep in the "average" range . Actually by looking at the USGS website we actually have a lower count of earthquakes in all but one of the magnitudes this year than in the past several years and that one is still within "average" range! [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] the statistics are based on MONTHLY averages, so statistically NO in that context. |
MatrixLNIN11 User ID: 20347511 United States 11/19/2012 09:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. Since he predicts earthquakes (or at least planetary line-ups which he claims will lead to earthquakes) for virtually every day of the week, it's quite difficult to actually be wrong. Quoting: doomie girl Now THAT I agree with and is something that puts things in proper context and perspective to measure whether what he's doing is as unique as he and others unaware of that are unaware of, or conveniently ignore. Here is a typical list from his YouTube channel: Quoting: doomie girl August 22 - 26, 2012: August 24, 2012: August 25, 2012: August 26, 2012: August 27, 2012 Some quaking can happen in a few days (but i don't expect big ones)… But on a second thought… August 30, 2012: August 30, 2012: August 31 — September 2, 2012: August 31, 2012: The latest posting on his Facebook page gives a prediction for a magnitude 7 earthquake on November 1st or 2nd. But he was wrong. It is easy try to do it yourself. Pick a date every 3 days. 10 days in a row. This will make your prediction flexible for about 24 hours since you could always claim that it was local time or GMT or chinese time or… Now look at the earth quakes and when you said Magnitude 6 and it is a 5.6 then claim it was spot on. Now go back and remove the claims that failed to predict anything. Patrick Geryl has a history of fudging his website after the fact or just making "predictions" that have a high chance of happening anyway. AHHH yes, There we go... That's what I thought and was trying to ascertain. But I'm still having a hard time finding all his past "predictions" he's claiming were "correct" and validate him. It shouldn't be that difficult to find and scrutinize. But it is. Hate to see you afraid! I was too and after alot of research have decided that he is just into fear mongering to sell his books and gain attention. Look, all his books focus on 2012 so pretty soon his books will be irrelevant. He is trying to cash in as much as possible now. Is he even in South Africa like he claims? Would love if someone can prove that or not. Quoting: doomie girl well one does have to ask what more his work does to further humanity past his "doomsday" or end of the world cataclysm if thats what he's saying because the world is NOT going to end on/around 12/21. Major Earth Changes during that period with some Great Quakes 8 to 9+ perhaps... but discoveries made by Mark Rodin and Nassim Haramein are among those too important to the future of the planet, for it to "end"! Lol |
MatrixLNIN11 User ID: 20347511 United States 11/19/2012 09:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. So... let's see, a Mag 7 or 6.9 at Myanmar... perhaps this needs to be bumped for further discussion and/or enlightenment... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26426080 Yes, what other interesting connections/correlations to that quake and date did he make? ;/ Thread: MYANMAR & Kentucky QUAKES HIT EXACT warning date 11/11 w/in 11 & 111 Miles of Ley-Lines thru NEW MADRID & 1@1:11! W o W |
MatrixLNIN11 User ID: 20347511 United States 11/19/2012 10:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. So... let's see, a Mag 7 or 6.9 at Myanmar... perhaps this needs to be bumped for further discussion and/or enlightenment... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26426080 Next up, a Mag 8.0 to strike anywhere near major fault lines in another 5-6 days. If such a Mag 8.0 earthquake strikes by November 16 2012, remember, you heard it from Solar Guardian here on GLP first, OK? Um. no... I think Patrick Geryl said it first! really? What date did he post on exactly??? |
MatrixLNIN11 User ID: 20347511 United States 11/19/2012 10:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. Here are his upcoming predictions. See for your self if he's right. Quoting: Wash This was written on Oct 28th, and take a look at what he called for Nov 7-8. November 7-8: possible 7 plus November 13-14: 6.5 plus November 15-16: 6.5 plus November 20: 6 plus November 22-23: 6.5 plus November 28: 7 December 4-5: 7 plus December 11: 7 plus December 17-18: 8 plus December 21: 10 plus" --------------------- November 7-8: possible 7 plus November 13-14: 6.5 plus November 15-16: 6.5 plus November 20: 6 plus November 22-23: 6.5 plus November 28: 7 --------------------- uhhh COME ON GUYS.... 6 plus and 6.5 plus ??? Reeeaally? lol One has to put this in more perspective and context before jumping on that wagon. There's only 2 unique notable dates/predictions in November there which I've shaded in RED and both of those were nearly the same dates others warned of long before. Now December seem to be a bit more interesting, --------------------- December 4-5: 7 plus December 11: 7 plus December 17-18: 8 plus December 21: 10 plus" --------------------- but when analyzed more closely, still only 1 (maybe 2) of the 4 dates are original and the 21st mainly because he "says" 10+ and "pole shift"? Soooo, Okay GREAT... but isn't that what most such theorists are saying? ;/ Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 11/19/2012 10:36 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20451055 United States 11/19/2012 10:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2251942 United States 11/19/2012 11:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MatrixLNIN11 User ID: 20347511 United States 11/20/2012 12:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. Again: To have a working theory of the 188 days, can you say WHERE the quake on 12/21 will hit? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2251942 Well, the 188 "days" aspect is primarily connected to the 188 day cycle. Or iow, that particular pattern in terms of the cycle or days, does not have anything to do with quakes "outside" the "cycle". So 12/21 has no connection in that context of 188 days/cycle. Perhaps now, you're beginning to understand the significance of MARCH 2013 i've discussed versus DECEMBER 2012 which is more about the precursor/beginning of that time period leading up to a full blown POLE SHIFT which is connected to the DIMENSIONAL VIBRATIONAL "SHIFT" of the Planets UPGRADE so to speak.... something the ELITES are desperately trying to PRE-EMPT which won't work or change. say to the NWO With that said, whats interesting is that the half way point to the next 188 cycle, is DECEMBER 31st GEE, what an amazing SYNCHRONCIDINK! Or in other words, approx 11 days from 12/31/12, is 12/21/12 ...and approx 16 days from that point is 12/16/12 so remember the TIME FRAME and DATES I've warned about in DECEMBER? 12/16 and 12/21 are KEY TARGET DATES within 2 MAJOR QUAKE windows coincidence? ;/ THE MAYANS WERE RIGHT Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 11/20/2012 02:06 AM |
MatrixLNIN11 User ID: 20347511 United States 11/20/2012 01:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. a MAGNITUDE 7.5+ to 8.5+ NEXT WEEK NOVEMBER 25th Target Date for this next major quake window. Thread: MAJOR QUAKE WARNING ALERT Magnitude 7+ to 8+ imminent 1111 to 113 posted about that date almost 3 months ago as well mate So if you haven't seen all my videos let alone my quake warnings for ALL MAJOR quakes in 2012 and since i began posting quake warnings in 2011 thats now reached a 90% hit ratio just for MAJOR QUAKES, If you're interested and are able to understand the subject matter I present connected to Ancient Sacred Geometry with the Ley Lines of 188 I've discovered, I highly recommend checking them ALL out as I think you might find them very interesting to say the least. Now the thing is, If I lowered the magnitude to 6.0 to 6.5 as my windows ALL USED to be earlier this year, I'd have an almost 99% success rate for nearly EVERY LARGE to MAJOR quake thats occurred in 2012 not even to mention my accuracy in 2011. But since quakes 6.5 and under are more common now than ever, once you understand the stats and my warnings let alone all that I've presented in my videos, anyone that posts such warnings lower the parameter to including 6 to 6.5 quakes like that and uses that as a basis or measure to validate their work and/or predictions, is tainting their work or creating a false impression when taken in CONTEXT or totality. I think PG has some good information and I like some of his work, but I do have an issue with him claiming just "large quakes" under 6.5 add to his "portfolio" or merit of what he's claiming let alone the fact his warnings are NOT CLEARLY archived nor does he or anyone address what I've just explained especially since as I've also said, his work and predictions are based on other peoples research and information that I'm not seeing him give any credit to. But since you seem to be a supporter, I'm open to you helping me answer some of these questions or address some of my points. Are you predicting a 10plus quake? Let me put it this way... between December 15th and 22nd, there will most likely be at least 1 GREAT QUAKE 7.9+ to 9.5+ probably MULTIPLE with an absolute minimum of 7.7 The primary CELESTIAL influences aside from the GALACTIC one will be: SUN MERCURY VENUS SATURN JUPITER EARTH SUN JUPITER EARTH VENUS EARTH SUN PLUTO MERCURY MARS NEPTUNE URANUS MERCURY SUN meaning, there's a potential for at least 1 being magnitude 9.9+ which does not even include the HUMAN IDIOT factor going on in the MIDDLE EAST thats going to be involved as well. So, I highly suggest if you live anywhere near a coastline or even a major urban center.... GTFO have emergency supplies for at least a month if not 3 to 6. be prepared for major power-grid disruptions ... so i also recommend also getting a solar generator anyone that thinks this is going to be like Y2K, is making a big mistake. and anyone that underestimates this time frame thinking nothing will happen, should go read about the EUT and a fool who's a disgrace to NASA named David Morrison. Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 11/20/2012 02:22 AM |
MatrixLNIN11 User ID: 20347511 United States 11/20/2012 01:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. Here are his upcoming predictions. See for your self if he's right. Quoting: Wash This was written on Oct 28th, and take a look at what he called for Nov 7-8. November 7-8: possible 7 plus November 13-14: 6.5 plus November 15-16: 6.5 plus November 20: 6 plus November 22-23: 6.5 plus November 28: 7 December 4-5: 7 plus December 11: 7 plus December 17-18: 8 plus December 21: 10 plus" November 14 = 6.1 2012/11/14 19:02:06 -29.157 -71.272 61.8 COQUIMBO, CHILE November 16 = 6.4 2012/11/16 18:12:40 49.269 155.472 29.1 KURIL ISLANDS That's NOT a 6.5 plus... The Kuril Islands was originally recorded as a 6.8 and later downgraded. TPTB downgraded it to discredit PG. No, they did it because they can and are being directed to. I doubt anyone at the usgs even knows about him other than being one of MANY who say pretty much the same thing. |
MatrixLNIN11 User ID: 20347511 United States 11/20/2012 01:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: UPDATE Dec 10: Damn...its time to start paying attenion to Patrick Geryl (i hate saying that). M7.4 in Guatemala...just like he said...again. Multiple locations on the 188 ley lines PRIMARY AREAS/REGIONS most likely to be affected and/or hit between now and 12/22/12: NORTH AMERICAN WESTERN COASTLINE REGION - California, Oregon, BC, Alaska NEW MADRID & YELLOWSTONE NYC & DC MEXICO & CENTRAL AMERICA CHILE, PERU & ECUADOR JAPAN & CHINA RUSSIA SUMATRA INDIA TURKEY Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 11/20/2012 01:45 AM |
Worried Child User ID: 28165877 United States 11/20/2012 06:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MatrixLNIN11 User ID: 20347511 United States 11/20/2012 06:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Solar Guardian User ID: 28132572 Malaysia 11/20/2012 10:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |