If the world is overpopulated.. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 658249 Netherlands 11/29/2012 02:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 18718419 United States 11/29/2012 02:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Actually the world is very overpopulated. I have read the little diagrams that show how everyone could live in Florida. Space-wise there is no such overpopulation. Resource-wise it is a different story. We cannot all live in western luxury. We in the west certainly are not going to give up our luxury for the greater good. At least I am bold enough to admit that I would not. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28725331 Netherlands 11/29/2012 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28725331 Netherlands 11/29/2012 02:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 963968 United States 11/29/2012 02:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1189758 China 11/29/2012 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just read that we could use twenty times the amount of soil, suited for agriculture, than we do now. With modern agriculture we could do a factor 20 better. 7x20x20=2800 billion people we can feed on this planet. THAT is what I call overpopulated. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28727370 South Africa 11/29/2012 02:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1492996 United States 11/29/2012 03:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've also read that we can give every man, woman, and child in the world 1 acre of land in Australia and everyone would fit there. I didn't do the research and math to verify and just took it at face value... Don't worry, Australia, we wouldn't dream of doing that to you... ...Again. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14516845 United States 11/29/2012 03:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Actually the world is very overpopulated. I have read the little diagrams that show how everyone could live in Florida. Space-wise there is no such overpopulation. Resource-wise it is a different story. We cannot all live in western luxury. We in the west certainly are not going to give up our luxury for the greater good. At least I am bold enough to admit that I would not. Lame. You're not very bright eh? I'll counter your idiocy with the fact that the earth could sustain 50 billion people. It's the asshats you follow...globalists, bankers, politicians that have run the earths sustainability into the ground. So. You have to make a choice! Are you going to continue to do what your masters tell you to do and beg for people to die...or are you going to wake the fuck up and demand LIFE!!!! A+++ Hit the nail on the head! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23409930 United Kingdom 11/29/2012 03:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23660254 United States 11/29/2012 03:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is not. All 7billion of us could fit in australia with an acre of land each and we would still have the entire rest of the world to spare! Do the math Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23409930 yeah that was already posted...op wasn't referring to physical space... any way, one thing is certain, we as humans, need to change the way we live and treat this planet. -as well as the rest of its inhabitants..we have caused much damage, to say the least. |
CripplingLies User ID: 5010858 Brazil 11/29/2012 03:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Then in theory all that needs to be done is to quarantine all third world countries and prevent anyone from leaving them. Implement measures to ensure that they all die from disease and then the global population will be greatly reduced. I read that the planet cannot sustain 6.7 billion people living in western luxury. Solution: Rid ourselves of third world nations and we will not have to worry about it. Theoretically of course. I am not going to openly support such a measure but neither will I deny that it would work because it would. The question is: Why is that not a better solution than killing off people in first world nations? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18718419 Sorry bro, the idea is the same, but instead of third world, the NWO will start with US. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22301087 United States 11/29/2012 03:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Then in theory all that needs to be done is to quarantine all third world countries and prevent anyone from leaving them. Implement measures to ensure that they all die from disease and then the global population will be greatly reduced. I read that the planet cannot sustain 6.7 billion people living in western luxury. Solution: Rid ourselves of third world nations and we will not have to worry about it. Theoretically of course. I am not going to openly support such a measure but neither will I deny that it would work because it would. The question is: Why is that not a better solution than killing off people in first world nations? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18718419 Really? I read that Chinese people are made of chocolate. Of course neither one could be farther from the truth. Malthus claimed that the world could not sustain a population greater than that seen in the 18th century. He was wrong and the earth can support many more people. There is plenty of arable land folks would work on creating new sources of water, food & energy rather than killing each other there will be no problem for quite a while. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22301087 United States 11/29/2012 03:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |