Something's Definitely "OFF" Here... Sandy Hook Victim's Father caught "ACTING". WTF!

In the Obama photo op, you see Emilie's little sister wearing the red dress with a bow. That dress is Emilie's which Emilie wore in another photo. How fucked up is it to put your child in her dead sister's dress?

He really amped up his performance for this one. But let's not forget the day AFTER his daughter was killed, he was smiling at his press conference. These people are sick sick sick. Running to all the media circuits. I'm sure they are just doing what they are told to do though.

can someone do the photoshop thing and post their results?

Thank you for your warm thoughts...........

you know? no matter how bad any one of us thinks we have had it.....there is always somebody who has had worse pain.

I often think I could write a book, I have had unbelievable things happen to me in my life, the loss of my child would be the capstone, and yet, I continually come across others who have had much worse.

I continue to thank AHYH for my many blessings.

Psalm 56: Most High,when I am afraid,
I put my trust in you.
5 In God — I praise his word —
in God I trust; I have no fear;
what can human power do to me?
.......
9 You have kept count of my wanderings;
store my tears in your water-skin —
aren’t they already recorded in your book?

Bullshit, you haven't been there.

You're full of shit.

Yes! Looks the same to me too.

As I speculated a couple pages ago (but spaced over three posts because I was still collecting my thoughts) I think that is the same Emilie with face turned away so you can't tell.

The same Emilie who is in the MIDDLE of the family photo, with her face covered by a large baby head. Emilie is also added ('shopped in) to the right side of that same photo, in another pose. So there are two of her in that photo.

There are only two girls in all the photos. Because the family portrait has Emilie twice, with one of her heads covered by a baby head. For family consistency that could be her own baby picture, enlarged as Salt proposed, or simply a closer shot but in any case resized to what is needed to cover the six or seven year old Emilie head there.

Link me to the photo and I will do it

When I double click the lock, it unlocks, but it still doesn't give me separate layers to look at. Unfortunately, it could be operator error too. I'm very new to Photoshop so I'll keep working with it. If anyone else is proficient with Photoshop, feel free to jump in.

im trying to load creative suite on my lappy. its taking forever.

when you open the layers box, how many layers are showing?

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]

vatican has a lot do with this whole thing
picked that up as soon as i first heard about it all

Just one. Would it be locked for another reason? A default setting maybe?

And I've seen a page of complaints from local Newtown people complaining about the press sniffing around and being downright rude and pushy. Staying within their legal rights but to the extent they would have no moral right to act that way in a town that was grieving.

So if there were sobbing to be seen, the MSM press would likely be seeing it.

hmmm... well im sure its a flattened jpg for internet purposes

are you sure there are no hidden layers?

here's a question, if he was acting and his daughter did not die/did not exist in the first place, how would he get away with either faking his daughter's death or never having the daughter?

I'm saying if this were true, how would nobody find out?

Did Victoria Soto exist?

Maybe it's just a legit photo.

Ever think of that brainiac?

if it is, i will try to de-obfuscate the image, but i dont know if i can do that with CS3. so.... this could take me a bit to answer

looks doctored to me and i am a professional

Sorry- I have no idea how to look for them.

Well he didn't have to fake anything except maybe photographs. He wasn't involved inside the school during what happened there that day, and still bodies have not even been shown.

How would he get away with never having had that daughter? I don't quite know what that question means.

The father has years of photos on their facebook page.

They would have to have been working on this for at least 3 years if he doesnt really have Emilie as a daughter.

His wifes facebook page has the pics. Its open to public.

Reasoning with the nut jobs is futile.

These are special bunch on this thread.

If this is the link to the photo [link to i.dailymail.co.uk]

In my experience JPG/JPEG are uneditable. They are flat images, No Layers.

Husband's facebook page is worth discussion. My impression is that it looks thrown together in a hurry, and it says he lives in Danbury. If he lives in Danbury, which is 15 miles away from Newtown let alone Sandy Hook which is on the east side of Newtown, he would normally have his kids in the Danbury school district rather than Sandy Hook.

Some of the photos are odd. One of the first ones has a middle name something like Anfedamine. I've never heard of a name like that, all I can think of is "amphetamine" i.e. uppers. I just imagine them furiously pasting this thing together after the Portland mall shooting fizzled and slapping it up there ...

I'd be interested in what others think.

Search his friends for Parker and you'll find his wifes page.

She has at least 3 years of pics and posts there.

Facebook would have to be in on this to let them date their FB page that far back.

There is also a ton of family saying sorry for their loss.

They in on it too?

Well if only a small fraction of that ton of friends is shown to exist as actual people, it would be a strong argument in favor of the page's authenticity.

I mean small fraction of that ton of family ... well either one actually. Iirc he has 494 facebook friends.