| Users Online Now: 1,981 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 739,992 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,296,077 | Threads Today: 421 | Posts Today: 8,717 |
| 01:02 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,981 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 739,992 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,296,077 | Threads Today: 421 | Posts Today: 8,717 |
| 01:02 PM | ||
Emilie Parker does not exist | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 32630104  United States01/21/2013 11:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22510744 United States01/21/2013 11:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 32630104 United States01/21/2013 11:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Knew the trolls would hit this first. They are so predictable. As soon as a good thread gets started, they hit it to derail or discredit. They try to be the first to post a reply. I actually like it cuz that's when you know the thread has credibility and they're scared truth will come out. Lol! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22510744 United States01/21/2013 11:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Knew the trolls would hit this first. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32630104 They are so predictable. As soon as a good thread gets started, they hit it to derail or discredit. They try to be the first to post a reply. I actually like it cuz that's when you know the thread has credibility and they're scared truth will come out. Lol! Yeah totally man! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1482838 United States01/21/2013 11:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 32630104 United States01/21/2013 11:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Charles Norris  User ID: 32681688 United States01/21/2013 11:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 32630104 United States01/21/2013 11:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 32630104 United States01/21/2013 11:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | People are still arguing whether the girl in the Obama pic is the sister or not. I have not seen anyone point out that she never existed in the first place. That its the sister doubled and photoshopped into the pic. And even if old news to you, this info needs to be pulled together and shared |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26609875 United States01/21/2013 11:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 32630104 United States01/21/2013 11:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | On the interview with Katie Couric, she asks the Parker's what the other two children know about what happened. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1482838 He tells her, "All they know is they haven't seen their best friend around for awhile". ?? !! I found that response extremely odd and telling. Thanks for sharing. I hadn't heard that. Very telling indeed. The girls are young enough to not know what's going on. I wonder what they'll think when they get older and see those family pictures on the Internet. IF we still have Internet in 10-15 years. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 32630104 United States01/21/2013 11:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 32630104 United States01/21/2013 11:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Missed a prior thread on this. Sorry. But still important info Thread: Emilie Parker Slide Show--It appears she did exist |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 32727622  United Kingdom01/21/2013 11:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26609875 United States01/21/2013 11:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | She never existed. There are no pictures of the three girls together that hasn't been photoshopped. Ever heard 'the devil's in the details'...we KNOW 'they' LIE...we KNOW 'they' decieve! While you're focusing on 'how many fingers are on the magicians right hand', you're FAILING to see what the left handis up to...DON'T BE DISTRACTED! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1482838 United States01/21/2013 11:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | On the interview with Katie Couric, she asks the Parker's what the other two children know about what happened. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1482838 He tells her, "All they know is they haven't seen their best friend around for awhile". ?? !! I found that response extremely odd and telling. Thanks for sharing. I hadn't heard that. Very telling indeed. The girls are young enough to not know what's going on. I wonder what they'll think when they get older and see those family pictures on the Internet. IF we still have Internet in 10-15 years. Yes, indeed. But, in the meantime, there is no way the girls wouldn't be saying all the time where is Sissy? or Where is Emilie? if they had a sister who suddenly was gone. Right? So when ask, why wouldn't you say that? That they keep asking us where Emilie is and when she'll be coming back. To say what he does, implies that a) they have shrugged it off and just noticed she hadn't been around for awhile in some vague sense...or b) she really is just a friend they haven't seen around in awhile...or c) they have no idea that another person is being passed off as their sister in the media and therefore no need to tell them anything. yet. But, sooner or later people will ask them and the jig will be up. |
| Dr. Charles Norris User ID: 7130256 United States01/21/2013 11:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | People are still arguing whether the girl in the Obama pic is the sister or not. I have not seen anyone point out that she never existed in the first place. That its the sister doubled and photoshopped into the pic. And even if old news to you, this info needs to be pulled together and shared Of course she existed! its rather or not is she part of this family...... LOL @ doesnt exist! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1482838 United States01/21/2013 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | People are still arguing whether the girl in the Obama pic is the sister or not. I have not seen anyone point out that she never existed in the first place. That its the sister doubled and photoshopped into the pic. And even if old news to you, this info needs to be pulled together and shared Of course she existed! its rather or not is she part of this family...... LOL @ doesnt exist! I agree. Just like the snafu with the Wyatt girl. For all we know these are just random pics found on the internet which contains billions of pics on fb alone. Then photoshopped onto a similar background of the green trees and peddled as "school pics". |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 32727337  Taiwan01/21/2013 12:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | People are still arguing whether the girl in the Obama pic is the sister or not. I have not seen anyone point out that she never existed in the first place. That its the sister doubled and photoshopped into the pic. And even if old news to you, this info needs to be pulled together and shared Of course she existed! its rather or not is she part of this family...... LOL @ doesnt exist! I agree. Just like the snafu with the Wyatt girl. For all we know these are just random pics found on the internet which contains billions of pics on fb alone. Then photoshopped onto a similar background of the green trees and peddled as "school pics". Hellos The Wyatt girl is the image of a little girl's school portrait that was in a news article of the victims, but the picture was of a girl that is alive right? If so I read the mother of the real alive girl freaked out on the Facebook distraught how the picture of her daughter was appearing on the news as a deceased person with a different name... I read that the photo was replaced at the original online article... It's just strange how the photo used to represent the victim was a few years old I think and how they even got it for the article... I mean are they just using random pictures now? Hard to believe but it seemed that way, and that movie Wag the Dog with Dustin Hoffman. |
| StarGazerPon User ID: 20407174 United States01/21/2013 11:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | She may very well be a vicsim. The government has been known to create fictitious victims in the past so I think it's possible that technology has advanced so much that they can create ultra realistic photos now. Remember this ultra realistic painting by Dru Blair a few years ago? [link to airbrushworkshops.com] [link to weburbanist.com] What I find strange is that in this day and age of smartphones and social media, Youtube and all that crap, we can't find any video footage of Emilie Parker or Vicki Soto. Or am I just not digging hard enough? Last Edited by StarGazerPon on 01/21/2013 11:59 PM |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 32630104 United States01/21/2013 11:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | People are still arguing whether the girl in the Obama pic is the sister or not. I have not seen anyone point out that she never existed in the first place. That its the sister doubled and photoshopped into the pic. And even if old news to you, this info needs to be pulled together and shared Of course she existed! its rather or not is she part of this family...... LOL @ doesnt exist! "Emilie" is actually the older sister. Photoshopped into the pics of the two sisters together. I don't know what the sisters names are. But there are only 2 sisters, 1) sister A and 2) younger sister B, the girl who sucks her fingers. They took pics of sister A and photoshopped her into the existing pics of sister A and B - giving the appearance of 3 sisters. Notice how sister A and Emilie look exactly alike. Because they are. In that regards, "Emile" doesn't exist as a separate being |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 32630104 United States01/22/2013 12:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | She may very well be a vicsim. The government has been known to create fictitious victims in the past so I think it's possible that technology has advanced so much that they can create ultra realistic photos now. Quoting: StarGazerPon Remember this ultra realistic painting by Dru Blair a few years ago? [link to airbrushworkshops.com] [link to weburbanist.com] What I find strange is that in this day and age of smartphones and social media, Youtube and all that crap, we can't find any video footage of Emilie Parker or Vicki Soto. Or am I just not digging hard enough? Great links. And true - they have technology decades ahead of the general population. They want the masses in the dark. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 32538141 United States01/22/2013 12:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| StarGazerPon User ID: 20407174 United States01/22/2013 01:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | She may very well be a vicsim. The government has been known to create fictitious victims in the past so I think it's possible that technology has advanced so much that they can create ultra realistic photos now. Quoting: StarGazerPon Remember this ultra realistic painting by Dru Blair a few years ago? [link to airbrushworkshops.com] [link to weburbanist.com] What I find strange is that in this day and age of smartphones and social media, Youtube and all that crap, we can't find any video footage of Emilie Parker or Vicki Soto. Or am I just not digging hard enough? Great links. And true - they have technology decades ahead of the general population. They want the masses in the dark. it probably wouldn't require that much work either. they could just put a stand-in for Emilie in the photos, then alter the face. The family pictures look like they were shot on a DSLR camera, those have Full EXIF data embedded in them. If someone can get a hold of one of those images, like the actual source of the .jpg file, we can look in the EXIF data to see if it was modified. I believe if it's uploaded on FB then FB will compress the images and the data is erased. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 32630104 United States01/22/2013 01:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | another point to ponder Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32538141 maybe she was never part of that family or any family a child made to be part of a ritual. i don't like to say these things but i know a bit about satanism and children are used in rituals Possibly. But I think that's where the other "shot" children ended up - ritual Perhaps the few kids that "died" with the parents doing interviews, were created and were able to save their kids by going along? Only 2 kids were taken to the hospital. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 32630104 United States01/22/2013 01:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | She may very well be a vicsim. The government has been known to create fictitious victims in the past so I think it's possible that technology has advanced so much that they can create ultra realistic photos now. Quoting: StarGazerPon Remember this ultra realistic painting by Dru Blair a few years ago? [link to airbrushworkshops.com] [link to weburbanist.com] What I find strange is that in this day and age of smartphones and social media, Youtube and all that crap, we can't find any video footage of Emilie Parker or Vicki Soto. Or am I just not digging hard enough? Great links. And true - they have technology decades ahead of the general population. They want the masses in the dark. it probably wouldn't require that much work either. they could just put a stand-in for Emilie in the photos, then alter the face. The family pictures look like they were shot on a DSLR camera, those have Full EXIF data embedded in them. If someone can get a hold of one of those images, like the actual source of the .jpg file, we can look in the EXIF data to see if it was modified. I believe if it's uploaded on FB then FB will compress the images and the data is erased. Good idea. I wish I knew how to do this. Maybe I'll research this tomorrow. And in the meantime...maybe someone else reading this can offer help? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1482838 United States01/22/2013 01:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | another point to ponder Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32538141 maybe she was never part of that family or any family a child made to be part of a ritual. i don't like to say these things but i know a bit about satanism and children are used in rituals Possibly. But I think that's where the other "shot" children ended up - ritual Perhaps the few kids that "died" with the parents doing interviews, were created and were able to save their kids by going along? Only 2 kids were taken to the hospital. You got some proof of that? I have seen no proof any kids were taken to a hospital. Not one shred. And yet they should have been life-flighted, or taken by ambulance every single one of these alleged kids and adults and attempts made to revive or treat wounds. Then if they didn't make it, declared dead and sent to the morgue. That's what REALLY happens in this situation. But, it didn't happen at Sandy Hook. Which kids were supposedly taken to a hospital and died? Where is the stretcher or gurney taking them down the road to the fire dept? Or where is the ambulance or helicopter. Not there. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 32630104 United States01/22/2013 01:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | another point to ponder Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32538141 maybe she was never part of that family or any family a child made to be part of a ritual. i don't like to say these things but i know a bit about satanism and children are used in rituals Possibly. But I think that's where the other "shot" children ended up - ritual Perhaps the few kids that "died" with the parents doing interviews, were created and were able to save their kids by going along? Only 2 kids were taken to the hospital. You got some proof of that? I have seen no proof any kids were taken to a hospital. Not one shred. And yet they should have been life-flighted, or taken by ambulance every single one of these alleged kids and adults and attempts made to revive or treat wounds. Then if they didn't make it, declared dead and sent to the morgue. That's what REALLY happens in this situation. But, it didn't happen at Sandy Hook. Which kids were supposedly taken to a hospital and died? Where is the stretcher or gurney taking them down the road to the fire dept? Or where is the ambulance or helicopter. Not there. Proof? Haha. You are right. There is no proof of anything in this bs story! But there was a news segment saying that 3 people were brought into the hospital. Supposedly they had over 100 trauma team members ready for the influx of patients. But only 2 kids and one adult showed up. There was also a clip of a medic pushing a gurney. The head of the gurney was raised up - which means the patient had to have been alive and conscious. But the blanket was pulled over the head. No one has seen bodies of any of the victims or of Adam or of nancy. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 32538141 United States01/22/2013 01:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | another point to ponder Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32538141 maybe she was never part of that family or any family a child made to be part of a ritual. i don't like to say these things but i know a bit about satanism and children are used in rituals Possibly. But I think that's where the other "shot" children ended up - ritual Perhaps the few kids that "died" with the parents doing interviews, were created and were able to save their kids by going along? Only 2 kids were taken to the hospital. You got some proof of that? I have seen no proof any kids were taken to a hospital. Not one shred. And yet they should have been life-flighted, or taken by ambulance every single one of these alleged kids and adults and attempts made to revive or treat wounds. Then if they didn't make it, declared dead and sent to the morgue. That's what REALLY happens in this situation. But, it didn't happen at Sandy Hook. Which kids were supposedly taken to a hospital and died? Where is the stretcher or gurney taking them down the road to the fire dept? Or where is the ambulance or helicopter. Not there. Proof? Haha. You are right. There is no proof of anything in this bs story! But there was a news segment saying that 3 people were brought into the hospital. Supposedly they had over 100 trauma team members ready for the influx of patients. But only 2 kids and one adult showed up. There was also a clip of a medic pushing a gurney. The head of the gurney was raised up - which means the patient had to have been alive and conscious. But the blanket was pulled over the head. No one has seen bodies of any of the victims or of Adam or of nancy. i think early on; the news was saying some kids had stomach problems this could be why they went to the hospital |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 32284139 United States01/22/2013 01:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No one has seen bodies of any of the victims or of Adam or of nancy. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32630104 I thought I had heard that someone working in the medical examiner's office (or something similar) brought his/her significant other in, after hours, to see the body of 'Adam Lanza'. If either of those people ever spoke up about what they saw, I missed it. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 32630104 United States01/22/2013 01:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can someone try this? I'm unable to do it with my computer. You can drag and drop a photo, or post link to the photo. And this website will extract the exif info [link to metapicz.com] She may very well be a vicsim. The government has been known to create fictitious victims in the past so I think it's possible that technology has advanced so much that they can create ultra realistic photos now. Quoting: StarGazerPon Remember this ultra realistic painting by Dru Blair a few years ago? [link to airbrushworkshops.com] [link to weburbanist.com] What I find strange is that in this day and age of smartphones and social media, Youtube and all that crap, we can't find any video footage of Emilie Parker or Vicki Soto. Or am I just not digging hard enough? Great links. And true - they have technology decades ahead of the general population. They want the masses in the dark. it probably wouldn't require that much work either. they could just put a stand-in for Emilie in the photos, then alter the face. The family pictures look like they were shot on a DSLR camera, those have Full EXIF data embedded in them. If someone can get a hold of one of those images, like the actual source of the .jpg file, we can look in the EXIF data to see if it was modified. I believe if it's uploaded on FB then FB will compress the images and the data is erased. |
