I live in in Newtown, CT

If that was the case then there wouldn't be any mainstream media reporting on their websites. lol

And #3, there is no way that would fly. #2, what I say is in no way, shape or form keeping them from doing their investigation.

Incorrect. Dangerously incorrect.

Crimes that are done here can be charged with an offense, just as anywhere else.

Interferinfering with a criminal investiagtion by posting false information about what you supposedly personally saw during the event is exactly that, if/when it is a lie, that is.

In fact some criminal investigations have started from stuff that happened here, and at least one person is in prison as we speak for it.

That's exactly why I said he should call in.

Glenn Beck worked for Fox... he's always been for the dark side. He just tried to infiltrate the growing conspiracy talk show host market.

Points 2 and 3 violate point 1 in the Bill of Rights - The First Amendment.

Also, Lt. Vance is a fascist POS who should have his badge shoved far up his ass.

You, who parrots Lt. Vance's BS should have Lt. Vance shoved far up YOUR ass.

So much for freedom of speech and opinion,my opinion of an opinion is: ITS THOUGHTS OF DIFF PEOPLE PUT ON THE TABLE THATS NOT NECCISSARY CORRECT AND OUT OF ALL THE DIFF OPINIONS A THOUGHT CLOSEST TO THE THRUTH MIGHT! EMERGE:and therefore opinons and free speech should be allowed otherwise dictatorships will arise....

Yes, however, it should be very easy to solve the problem. You would be very useful, if you claim to be a real concerned citizen of Newtown/Sandy Hook.

Like I said, as soon as I get anything from you that tells me you are real, I will draft you a Todo-List. If you aren't scared to ask questions, and really want to know what happened in your town, I would have several people you could ask some questions.

If I tell my other author of you, and you are real, he will have plenty to add to the list. We can only do so much besides blogging and calling people.

I seriously hope we can go further in this thread...


So let's do this.

Again, there have been plenty of fools charged with a crime for being as stupid as your thinking.

If you provide knowingly false information about an ongoing law enforcement investigation, you absolutely most certainly can be charged with a crime.

Theres a difference between what conspiracy theorists do(just interpreting existing info), and what youre doing(providing knowingly false info).

IN FACT - a press conference was given on national TV that anyone engaging in making up false 'evidence' about the Sandy Hook school shooting would be pursued to the fullest extent of the law. Its probably on youtube somewhere. It was posted here when they did that.

It's a well known tactic to include a lot of small details in a fake story if you want to make it sound believable -- like what kind of cereal you had, and what you were listening to on the radio.

Confirmation of the OP's story is REAL simple.

Any Mod should be able to view the OP's IP address. Simply run an IP track. The result will show Newtown CT if the OP is legit.

is the nurse that was on TV really employed there because some people were saying that she wasn't registered to that school

Just quit. Your attitude is the kind fascists love - never questioning authority.

If you never question it, you're gonna get lied to, you're gonna get deceived, and you're gonna get fucked over.

This is the atmosphere that exists in China and it's not going to being tolerated here.

I agree - details like that are added to make a story appear genuine, but someone who was simply retelling events would not include such details.

Sorry OP, good try but,

Peek into the mirror, blind one. It is YOU who needs a more inquisitive mind.

I question e v e r y t h i n g. Thats how I know the OP is lying.

This is probably true, but I have to be honest, the mind works in strange ways. Sometimes I remember really strange random details from important events. For example I still remember what I wore on my first day of high school, and I remember so many details from 9-11, like what I was doing, who I was with, what I was eating, the lip gloss I was wearing, etc.

:free seech:

And if SH really happened as a big false flag, this info wont see the light of day but certainly would also not impede investigations because that would mean investigations are all premeditated. What we have is a witness relaying a possibility of what they saw. Nothing in the admittance is concrete, nor would any of this info impact formal investigations if it was a false flag afterall. If it was real, then the OP needs to tread carefully so as to not become a target to law enforcement. If it is fake, the same worry would exist.

Afaics, there is only a personal review of the day which is no different than how september 11 happened for me. Many people uploaded video, testimonials, etc. They werent brought to justice because of posting what they did that day--it was moot evidence.

OP would more likely be brushed under the rug as a benign person that might still have reasonable questions regarding the incident. I expect a lot of people would discredit this person but that just means less for law enforcement to concern themselves with. No doubt there are paid shills right now to ensure automatic weapons get banned nationwide after this handgun incident.

No doubt crimes have been committed via glp in the past, however i doubt leas are going to care about one person relaying their happenings on that date when he didnt even witness the crimes in person. He isnt even a witness, just casual observer.

Yeah, I agree. I remember exactly what I was doing when Kennedy was shot, when Diana died and 9/11.

But, that story was just too contrived.

It's still bullshit.

You can only provide false information to law enforcement official or in court. Typing this on the Internet is not a crime at all. Where did you get your law degree. It's a lame attempt to make a public gag order covering the entire planet. How can you enforce that? You can't. He can bounce his ip and be in Europe saying they were at sandy hoax, totally lie about the things they saw with zero recourse. Our laws have no jurisdiction outside the US. So this ignorant universal gag order theory is bullshit. Who are these plants saying this stuff? Idiot morons.

Thank you for your post, op, but imho, there's nothing too sensational to it.
I don't think you have to worry for your safety because all of your encounters that day seem fairly logical and can go either way.

Summary: You didn't know what was going on that road that day and neither did anybody else you encountered.

* The cop you talked to guessed it was a drill.
That's the nature of 'guard duty'. His only instructions: let nobody down the road. A cop will do that, guard something without being told what or why. They escort limos all the time without knowing who's inside. Their simply called v.i.p.'s. and... cops will lie to you to if they want. Doesn't mean the copy's "in on it".


* You did not recognize all of the witnesses & victims' families.
Just because we don't know everybody in town, even when they make the news, doesn't mean they don't exist. Once again, fits nice with a coverup but not conclusive.

* Your school teacher friend/gf/ex claimed she nobody told her what was going on either.
I'm not from Newton, but one thing's for certain, nobody knows what really happened that day, especially folks from that town. Not being rude, but the story has been so tampered from the top, that one can't be surprised by another professional kept in the dark.


Not a debunker. I know Sandy Hook got twisted from whatever really happened into an assault rifle grab even though an a.r. wasn't used.

We all saw the rifle in the trunk! <-THAT my friends is all the proof needed that the official story has been severely tampered with.

And what do ya know, NOW they're telling us no a.r. was used and sure enough, the court records: SEALED

OP.. would you take a drive to the town cemetery.. see the new graves if they are there? Thanks..

The only thing that I can confirm is that there is a Robert Parker there and he is an old bastard. Found that and posted it in another thread a couple of weeks ago.

Of course the OP could have found that thread!

Must be on to something if all the shills are flocking here, don't mind them OP it's par for the course for GLP.

The most telling point would be if you think you can lock in what time you first went by the firehouse.

You end by by saying you "don't know what's going on" but present your experience and theory. well, no one believes what the media presents as truth, and our govenment has zero credibility. But I DO know Scarlett Lewis, her mother Maureen, her ex Neil (Jesse's father) and her two sons. My kids saw hers all summer, they go boating on the same lake together. They are kind and good people, Scarlett owns a farm and has opened it up to many children who might not ever get to go horseback riding or experience "farm life". So why in the world would you put such an ugly, unrelated remark into your post? Are you one of her stupid neighbors who bought one of the "McMansions" in the new development they put in across the street, and who now complain about her barn and animals even though they live across from a working 1700's farm??? One of the people who have left nasty notes, have let her sheep and other animals out then called Animal Control to complain? Hmmm ???

I live two towns away (Huntington) and my shop, Talisman (you can google it to confirm) is one town away in Monroe. We are ALL devastated here by this senseless, horrible act of violence. No matter who or what perpetrated it, the children ARE dead. We are all grieving. There are many unanswered questions, much that is not being told to us and we are aware of all that. But don't say things that are just mean and have no relevance - Scarlett doesn't deserve that, and as her friend I am deeply offended. Come to the shop, I'll be happy to discuss this in in-depth with you ...

Thank you,
Laura Lenhard (I am NO "anonymous coward"!!!)

You are referring to the crime of providing false information to law enforcement which is a separate charge from what I am referring.


please see:
Perverting the course of justice
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
"Perverting the course of justice can be any of three acts:
Fabricating or disposing of evidence
Intimidating or threatening a witness or juror
Intimidating or threatening a judge"

Impersonating an eyewitness is fabricating evidence.




[link to www.youtube.com]






Some of what is posted here is just for fun, just to get people riled up, for shits and grins, etc, and not true. Thats OK and its understood by most of us. However, that doesnt change the fact that you can be charged with a crime for criminal activity here. A disclaimer at the bottom of the page doesnt change that, and Trinity knows that and doesnt insinuate anything different in any way.

Unbelievable the idiots trying to tell you what to do, scare you off, or make you prove where you live. They can GFO if they don't want to accept your story. There's nothing over the top, the tone is moderate and seems plausible. Not everyone is a great speller, some are dyslexic you asshats, or come from families that use slang, like in the South. (Y'all I reckon... Etc.)

Thanks for the birds' eye view, nice to hear some background & the firehouse story & cop in the road is interesting. Any cop called to a shooting at a school would have heard all the details of why he was there.

No. I don't have to look it up because I know exactly who you are. Apparently you don't know her the way you think you do. I guess all that hippy, earthy, spiritual, voodoo bull has fogged your brain?

Good for you Laura! Im sure GLP would love to know what you know about Sandy Hook! :)