New Chinese Aircraft Carriers: “Quantum Leaps” ahead of US carriers | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33832742 United States 02/17/2013 12:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3202564 United States 02/17/2013 12:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is quantum leaps above anything we even Quoting: objective viewer have on the drawing board, way "outside the box" here: better speed, larger capacity, much more stable, 'Cat hull takes out the yaw... and much, much more... [link to www.salem-news.com] A Navy at this point is in the game nothing more than a dog and pony show. They are floating targets and a nations complete fleet could be sunk in a hour. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19980561 United States 02/17/2013 12:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is quantum leaps above anything we even Quoting: objective viewer have on the drawing board, way "outside the box" here: better speed, larger capacity, much more stable, 'Cat hull takes out the yaw... and much, much more... [link to www.salem-news.com] "According to what we are learning, the new carriers can service their nuke and sub fleet in between the twin hulls and it is also reported that they can easily launch amphibious operations from the same area, and that they will launch in half the time the Americans can currently do the same." Smart |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31535914 United States 02/17/2013 12:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is quantum leaps above anything we even Quoting: objective viewer have on the drawing board, way "outside the box" here: better speed, larger capacity, much more stable, 'Cat hull takes out the yaw... and much, much more... [link to www.salem-news.com] A Navy at this point is in the game nothing more than a dog and pony show. They are floating targets and a nations complete fleet could be sunk in a hour. carriers are old school, it's all about Drones Baby |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27726810 Philippines 02/17/2013 12:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is quantum leaps above anything we even Quoting: objective viewer have on the drawing board, way "outside the box" here: better speed, larger capacity, much more stable, 'Cat hull takes out the yaw... and much, much more... [link to www.salem-news.com] A Navy at this point is in the game nothing more than a dog and pony show. They are floating targets and a nations complete fleet could be sunk in a hour. true, unless we are talking about the boats that can sink themselves and then rise again |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33652014 United States 02/17/2013 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.corvalliscommunitypages.com] China will never defeat us. The United States is undefeated in conflicts against foreign states. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34569828 Brazil 02/17/2013 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.corvalliscommunitypages.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33652014 China will never defeat us. The United States is undefeated in conflicts against foreign states. Errrr, Vietnam ? Or are you saying they didnt lose but strategically withdrew? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33832742 United States 02/17/2013 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.corvalliscommunitypages.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33652014 China will never defeat us. The United States is undefeated in conflicts against foreign states. They don't have to defeat us in a war. All they have to do is wait a few more months for our economy and our "money" to completely collapse. “The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34608376 United Kingdom 02/17/2013 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is quantum leaps above anything we even Quoting: objective viewer have on the drawing board, way "outside the box" here: better speed, larger capacity, much more stable, 'Cat hull takes out the yaw... and much, much more... [link to www.salem-news.com] What have you been smoking............ The carrier was a partly completed RUSSIAN carrier. Its not a cat hull either. All the artists impressions on that site are crap.. [link to rt.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33652014 United States 02/17/2013 01:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rinty User ID: 18164113 United States 02/17/2013 01:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is quantum leaps above anything we even Quoting: objective viewer have on the drawing board, way "outside the box" here: better speed, larger capacity, much more stable, 'Cat hull takes out the yaw... and much, much more... [link to www.salem-news.com] A Navy at this point is in the game nothing more than a dog and pony show. They are floating targets and a nations complete fleet could be sunk in a hour. The above is very true. Thank you, Anonymous. China does not need a modern navy. The main reason for developing one is to counter one of their main internal problems: education. They are education so many of their population, and doing such a good job, that they must find work for them. A 'modern navy' serves this issue. Note that the British navy does not want another carrier, admiralty says 'no use for another'. However the pols force it on the admiralty anyway as they have doled out all the contracts in return for votes. Same in US |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14494585 United States 02/17/2013 01:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14130251 United States 02/17/2013 01:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is quantum leaps above anything we even Quoting: objective viewer have on the drawing board, way "outside the box" here: better speed, larger capacity, much more stable, 'Cat hull takes out the yaw... and much, much more... [link to www.salem-news.com] A Navy at this point is in the game nothing more than a dog and pony show. They are floating targets and a nations complete fleet could be sunk in a hour. tell that to a thumb sucking shill |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14130251 United States 02/17/2013 01:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
New Hope User ID: 19701128 United States 02/17/2013 01:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.corvalliscommunitypages.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33652014 China will never defeat us. The United States is undefeated in conflicts against foreign states. They don't have to defeat us in a war. All they have to do is wait a few more months for our economy and our "money" to completely collapse. “The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War More true than you might think. Stop and think about it for a second folks; every time we (the U.S.) hears mere rumors of a new way of countering our military tech, let alone a test version of something, the military-industrial complex pumps billions and billions of dollars into a new generation of fighters, carriers, guns, drones, etc. And the fact that there's never a full production run of said counter-tech doesn't matter. By that point, we've already pumped billions of dollars into our own projects, thus increasing our debt. Our enemies have gotten smarter. They know they can't really take us in a shooting war. But they can cause us to economically damage ourselves. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33652014 United States 02/17/2013 01:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Errrr, Vietnam ? Or are you saying they didnt lose but strategically withdrew? Well, Vietnam is interesting. America was never defeated militarily in Vietnam. Yes, the United States ended the "conflict", and "strategically withdrew". However, the goal of Vietnam was to "contain communism". I'm not sure if you realize this or not, but the Soviet Union collapsed more than 20 years ago. There are market economies emerging everywhere. These countries are gradually becoming more and more capitalistic. The premise behind this is the "modernization theory". The banks and international corporations that control our government have defeated communism. This is a picture of a "Kentucky Fried Chicken" in Vietnam. Now, who lost Vietnam, again? [link to www.vietnamfood.org] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34023421 United States 02/17/2013 01:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27921992 United States 02/17/2013 01:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33931923 United States 02/17/2013 01:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1546575 United Kingdom 02/17/2013 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is quantum leaps above anything we even Quoting: objective viewer have on the drawing board, way "outside the box" here: better speed, larger capacity, much more stable, 'Cat hull takes out the yaw... and much, much more... [link to www.salem-news.com] What have you been smoking............ The carrier was a partly completed RUSSIAN carrier. Its not a cat hull either. All the artists impressions on that site are crap.. [link to rt.com] Thats a different one.. The new one is on the drawing boards. America could simply now copy the design when it replaces its own nimitz fleet. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1546575 United Kingdom 02/17/2013 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
twattyboy User ID: 25563398 Netherlands 02/17/2013 01:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Errrr, Vietnam ? Or are you saying they didnt lose but strategically withdrew? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33652014 Well, Vietnam is interesting. America was never defeated militarily in Vietnam. Yes, the United States ended the "conflict", and "strategically withdrew". However, the goal of Vietnam was to "contain communism". I'm not sure if you realize this or not, but the Soviet Union collapsed more than 20 years ago. There are market economies emerging everywhere. These countries are gradually becoming more and more capitalistic. The premise behind this is the "modernization theory". The banks and international corporations that control our government have defeated communism. This is a picture of a "Kentucky Fried Chicken" in Vietnam. Now, who lost Vietnam, again? [link to www.vietnamfood.org] Well said. The U.S met their objectives, even if it didn't seem like it at the time. Will be interesting to see how Iraq pans out. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1863888 United States 02/17/2013 01:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.corvalliscommunitypages.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33652014 China will never defeat us. The United States is undefeated in conflicts against foreign states. Errrr, Vietnam ? Or are you saying they didnt lose but strategically withdrew? Though it is true that the US pulled out, it is also true the we killed nearly a million of them mothafuckers in the process so to say that we "lost" is an exaggerated claim to say the least. I think we pulled out due to the unpopularity of the war here in the homeland not to mention the ines in power at that time realized it would take decades longer to win that war, maybe to the extent of genociding every VC in the process because they were not the type to surrender. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25473374 United States 02/17/2013 01:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is quantum leaps above anything we even Quoting: objective viewer have on the drawing board, way "outside the box" here: better speed, larger capacity, much more stable, 'Cat hull takes out the yaw... and much, much more... [link to www.salem-news.com] "According to what we are learning, the new carriers can service their nuke and sub fleet in between the twin hulls and it is also reported that they can easily launch amphibious operations from the same area, and that they will launch in half the time the Americans can currently do the same." Smart Nuke subs don't need surfacing. They go out on patrol and once outside coastal waters they submerse and they stay submerged for the duration of the patrol. |
10-DUDE User ID: 33403755 United States 02/17/2013 01:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33569884 United States 02/17/2013 01:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.corvalliscommunitypages.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33652014 China will never defeat us. The United States is undefeated in conflicts against foreign states. Errrr, Vietnam ? Or are you saying they didnt lose but strategically withdrew? There have been wars that we did not 'win', based on politics, not on capabilities. But America has never 'lost' a war. (although 1812 is debatable...) I am against Americas aggressive stance in the world, but just telling the truth... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27726810 Philippines 02/17/2013 01:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.corvalliscommunitypages.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33652014 China will never defeat us. The United States is undefeated in conflicts against foreign states. Titanic will never sink Twin towers will stand forever both brought down by false flags by your great country and the people who are behind it all will bring the entire thing down while dummies stand in stupified awe muttering "but but they said it couldn't happen" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33569884 United States 02/17/2013 02:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.corvalliscommunitypages.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33652014 China will never defeat us. The United States is undefeated in conflicts against foreign states. They don't have to defeat us in a war. All they have to do is wait a few more months for our economy and our "money" to completely collapse. “The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War More true than you might think. Stop and think about it for a second folks; every time we (the U.S.) hears mere rumors of a new way of countering our military tech, let alone a test version of something, the military-industrial complex pumps billions and billions of dollars into a new generation of fighters, carriers, guns, drones, etc. And the fact that there's never a full production run of said counter-tech doesn't matter. By that point, we've already pumped billions of dollars into our own projects, thus increasing our debt. Our enemies have gotten smarter. They know they can't really take us in a shooting war. But they can cause us to economically damage ourselves. The 'debt' doesnt matter if we dont intend on paying it back... The debt isnt even real anyway. It is just propaganda that the Zionist bankers use to brainwash people into giving up their standards of life so that the 'elite' can have more, more, more. |
Panhead User ID: 34178062 United States 02/17/2013 02:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | just exactly how many do they have?....their Navy is very small in scale to what the US can put afloat. "Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the American Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." Henry Ford "Disappointment is Anger for wimps" House |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34610595 United States 02/17/2013 02:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |