HOW did we get to the MOON if we didn't know about this??

Thank you, Mr. Vice President, Mr. President, members of Congress, fellow astronauts, ladies and gentlemen.

Wilbur Wright once noted that the only bird that cold talk was the parrot, and he didn't fly very well. So I'll be brief. This week America has been recalling the Apollo program and reliving the memories of those times in which so many of us here, colleagues here in the first rows, were immersed. Our old astrogeology mentor, Gene Shoemaker, even called in one of his comets to mark the occasion with spectacular Jovian fireworks. And reminding us once again of the power and consequence of celestial extracurricular activities.

Many Americans were part of Apollo, about one or two in each thousand citizens, all across the country. They were asked by their country to do the impossible--to envisage the design and to build a method of breaking the bonds of earth's gravity and then sally forth to visit another heavenly body. The principal elements--leaving earth, navigating in space and descending to a planet unencumbered with runways and traffic control--would include major requirements necessary for a space-faring people.

Today a space shuttle flies overhead with an international crew. A number of countries have international space programs. During the space age we have increased our knowledge of our universe a thousand-fold.

Today we have with us a group of students, among America's best. To you we say we have only completed a beginning. We leave you much that is undone. There are great ideas undiscovered, breakthroughs available to those who can remove one of the truth's protective layers. There are many places to go beyond belief. Those challenges are yours--in many fields, not the least of which is space, because there lies human destiny.

WITH ROCKETS AND COMPOSITE MATERIALS AND METALS AND MATH!

Add in a few dudes with suits, made out of COMPOSITE MATERIALS AND METALS

Well then.
Thread closed.

I think that the fact that so many here know so little science makes it impossible to explain how we went to the moon. There is the immutable assumption that everything works the same there as there in spite of the dramatic difference in environment.
The assumption that any radiation would stop the trip is also evident.
And calling anyone who disagrees a shill certainly doesn't help you gain a wider knowledge of the subject and the science.
In other words, you are to stupid to explain it to and you simple refuse to change that.

I was a friend of Neil Armstrong's for 35 years. He went to the moon.

You're responding to a full blown retard.
You might as well hold a discourse on astrophysics
at St. Claire's Mental Institution.

It goes even further than being a parrot, thanks to the second part of the analogy : "he didnt fly very well." and to his conclusion : "So I'll be brief".

>Implying he can't talk (as he can fly very well).
>Implying if he talks, it's like a parrot.

anyone who thinks the apollo missions landed man on the moon are fucked in the head, period.
And guess what, i've even had lunch with apollo astronot charlie duke, i bet even the shills here can't claim that !!

You had lunch with an astronaut? Pics or it didn't happen.

There is no belt in the moon studio, that's how...

I'll make these final comments and then drop out of this conversation. Some people on this thread seem angry that Neil Armstrong got to the moon, so they concoct all kinds of reasons to prove he didn't go there. Some ancient Greek once said that humans raise up gods so they can tear them down. I think this means that ordinary, non heroic people, which is about 99.9% of the population, hates the thought that some extraordinary people do amazing things. I think maybe that's what's occurring here with the angry posts insisting that this one extraordinary man did an extraordinary thing.

In the 35 years I knew Neil I never asked him the stupid question of "Did you really go to the moon?" because in casual conversations on other subjects he referenced things having to do with him landing on the moon. There is a famous shot that Aldrin took of Neil just after they landed and before Neil got out of the Lander, and his eyes are red rimmed and glassy. I joked to him that it looked like he had just finished a two day drinking binge and he said that in space, blood tends to congregate in mucus membranes like around the eyes. Many of those comments told me that he had been on the moon. And this thing I'll tell you about the man...he would be the last person in the world to lie. He was that straight an arrow. He was the guy every parent would hope their son would grow up to be like.

You non believers should move on to an easier target, like the president of the United States.

1/ There is just one group : the euro-american empire. World gov is a reality.
2/ It is not development and advancements so much as it is tech given to the shadow gov by the Aliums.
3/ Managing the different circles, from the public circle to the most totally far out there circle, takes mucho money and resources indeed, hence the current financial/criminal madness.
4/ Building up rationalizations as to why something isnt possible or likely, without having tested the hypothesis by its own rules (and inside the paradigm it belongs to) isn't sound reasoning. It's just an expression of bias, a mental immune system reacting to change induced by strange ideas.

I'll make these final comments and then drop out of this conversation. Some people on this thread seem angry that Neil Armstrong got to the moon, so they concoct all kinds of reasons to prove he didn't go there. Some ancient Greek once said that humans raise up gods so they can tear them down. I think this means that ordinary, non heroic people, which is about 99.9% of the population, hates the thought that some extraordinary people do amazing things. I think maybe that's what's occurring here with the angry posts insisting that this one extraordinary man did an extraordinary thing.

In the 35 years I knew Neil I never asked him the stupid question of "Did you really go to the moon?" because in casual conversations on other subjects he referenced things having to do with him landing on the moon. There is a famous shot that Aldrin took of Neil just after they landed and before Neil got out of the Lander, and his eyes are red rimmed and glassy. I joked to him that it looked like he had just finished a two day drinking binge and he said that in space, blood tends to congregate in mucus membranes like around the eyes. Many of those comments told me that he had been on the moon. And this thing I'll tell you about the man...he would be the last person in the world to lie. He was that straight an arrow. He was the guy every parent would hope their son would grow up to be like.

You non believers should move on to an easier target, like the president of the United States.

REMARKS BY MR. NEIL ARMSTRONG -- HON. GEORGE E. BROWN, JR.
(Extension of Remarks - July 20, 1994)

[Page: E1509]

HON. GEORGE E. BROWN, JR.

in the House of Representatives

WEDNESDAY, JULY 20, 1994

* Mr. BROWN of California. Mr. Speaker, on this the 25th anniversary of the first Moon landing, I would like to insert into the Record the eloquent remarks of Mr. Neil Armstrong, the first human to set foot on the surface of another world. These remarks were given at the White House today during a ceremony commemorating the Apollo 11 mission.



[link to www.thelivingmoon.com]

So to sum up :
Neil implies he is a PARROT.
Then he challenges YOU to "remove one of the truth's protective layers" and go to " many places to go beyond belief".

But sheeple gonna sheeple.

Mmm, so you think the belts are 2 dimensional hey?

[link to images.yourdictionary.com]

It goes even further than being a parrot, thanks to the second part of the analogy : "he didnt fly very well." and to his conclusion : "So I'll be brief".

>Implying he can't talk (as he can fly very well).
>Implying if he talks, it's like a parrot.

Again with the appeal to magic. There is no proof of the above. There is proof that the Apollo hardware was capable of making it to the Moon and back. No magic or aliens needed.

Clearly the belts are 3D but that doesn't mean they thick and can't be easily gone around.

Oh my, you have a lot of studying to do!

That's rather funny coming from someone as incredibly dense as you.

You're to dumb to process the information in your own thread.
See Weasel Turbine's post on Page 2.

Nothing about the dimensions and location of the VARBs is secret.
There are hundreds of entities that operate hardware in the Belts.
Nothing about the path of the Apollo flights is secret.
Everybody with a telescope could see it.

And, unless you know the actual radiation levels and the durations of exposure, all that is meaningless anyway.

If YOUR claim is that flying to the Moon is impossible, it is YOU who will have to proof it.
Just shrieking RADIATION!!!!11!!OMG!!!11! like some hysterical ignorant radiophobe won't cut it.

I didn't say that we didn't go to the moon!

I asked why didn't we know about this radiation belt at the time?

After all, we must have passed through it?

Or maybe, if we believe you we went round it?!