HAARP beam on doppler radar of Oklahoma tornado????? | |
Ford Prefect (OP) User ID: 40003528 Brazil 05/21/2013 04:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ford Prefect (OP) User ID: 40003528 Brazil 05/21/2013 04:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MelvinKartinWeatherGenius User ID: 23829721 United States 05/21/2013 04:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1211208 United States 05/21/2013 04:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ford Prefect (OP) User ID: 40003528 Brazil 05/21/2013 04:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ford Prefect (OP) User ID: 40003528 Brazil 05/21/2013 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ford Prefect (OP) User ID: 40003528 Brazil 05/21/2013 05:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I see... apparently people on GLP are more interested in just speculate whether the tornado in Oklahoma was HAARP-made, rather than actually verify the radar data in order to search for anomalies. It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36783066 Netherlands 05/21/2013 07:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ford Prefect (OP) User ID: 40252076 Brazil 05/21/2013 07:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Star User ID: 38743265 United States 05/21/2013 07:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ohwow! User ID: 16023386 United States 05/21/2013 07:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No, they wouldn't manipulate the weather by enhancing the severity of a storm. See here: ARTICLE I 1. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party. 2. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to assist, encourage or induce any State, group of States or international organization to engage in activities contrary to the provisions of paragraph 1 of this article. ARTICLE II As used in article 1, the term "environmental modification techniques" refers to any technique for changing - through the deliberate manipulation of natural processes--the dynamics, composition or structure of the Earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere, or of outer space. [link to www.sweetliberty.org] So no, they promised and agreed not to manipulate the weather back in 1976. Which of course begs the question, agreeing not to do it says they must have the capabilities to do it. This was written in 1976, surely they aren't capable of even more ennhanced weather modification through new energy weapons. So there, we can all rest assured that our leaders would never use something like weather modification as a war weapon |
Ford Prefect (OP) User ID: 40252076 Brazil 05/21/2013 08:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No, they wouldn't manipulate the weather by enhancing the severity of a storm. See here: Quoting: Ohwow! ARTICLE I 1. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party. 2. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to assist, encourage or induce any State, group of States or international organization to engage in activities contrary to the provisions of paragraph 1 of this article. ARTICLE II As used in article 1, the term "environmental modification techniques" refers to any technique for changing - through the deliberate manipulation of natural processes--the dynamics, composition or structure of the Earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere, or of outer space. [link to www.sweetliberty.org] So no, they promised and agreed not to manipulate the weather back in 1976. Which of course begs the question, agreeing not to do it says they must have the capabilities to do it. This was written in 1976, surely they aren't capable of even more ennhanced weather modification through new energy weapons. So there, we can all rest assured that our leaders would never use something like weather modification as a war weapon If the US military promised not engage in weather manipulation, then I feel absolutely reassured that they are not using HAARP, ionospheric heating, chemtrails and hypersonic drones loaded with kinetic weapons, to trigger any sort of atmospheric disturbance or earthquakes. Last Edited by Ford Prefect on 05/21/2013 08:00 PM It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is. |
Ford Prefect (OP) User ID: 40252076 Brazil 05/21/2013 08:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If the US military don't have or are not using weather modification warfare, maybe the HAARP-shills would like to explain why the fuck the European Parliament voted a motion in 1998 to hold the US government accountable for using HAARP as environmental weapon???? On 5 February 1998 Parliament’s Subcommittee on Security and Disarmament held a hearing the subject of which included HAARP. NATO and the US had been invited to send representatives, but chose not to do so. The Committee regrets the failure of the USA to send a representative to answer questions, or to use the opportunity to comment on the material submitted.(22) Quoting: [link to www.europarl.europa.eu] HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) is run jointly by the US Air Force and Navy, in conjunction with the Geophysical Institute of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Similar experiments are also being conducted in Norway, probably in the Antarctic, as well as in the former Soviet Union.(23) HAARP is a research project using a ground based apparatus, an array of antennae each powered by its own transmitter, to heat up portions of ionosphere with powerful radio beams.(24) The energy generated heats up parts of the ionosphere; this results in holes in the ionosphere and produces artificial ’lenses’. HAARP can be used for many purposes. Enormous quantities of energy can be controlled by manipulating the electrical characteristics of the atmosphere. If used as a military weapon this can have a devastating impact on an enemy. HAARP can deliver millions of times more energy to a given area than any other conventional transmitter. The energy can also be aimed at a moving target which should constitute a potential anti-missile system. Last Edited by Ford Prefect on 05/21/2013 08:39 PM It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40260170 United States 05/21/2013 08:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32387428 United States 05/21/2013 08:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40260170 United States 05/21/2013 08:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves." Quoting: Anonymous Coward 40260170 Secretary of Defense Cohen April 28, 1997 [link to presscore.ca] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40260170 United States 05/21/2013 08:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves." Quoting: Anonymous Coward 40260170 Secretary of Defense Cohen April 28, 1997 [link to www.defense.gov] |
Ford Prefect (OP) User ID: 40252076 Brazil 05/21/2013 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
xxGirlOnFirexx User ID: 4928462 United States 05/23/2013 01:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't think an agreement is assurance that the technology won't be used to further political agenda (whatever it maybe) however, I'll be honest. I live in the plains and weather patterns like that do not look unusual to me. The severity was incredible, but by and large it looks like a typical severe thunderstorm. This one just had HORRIBLE consequences. I of course will not deny that it is possible to manipulate such weather, I firmly think playing with the ionosphere of the earth can only end badly, especially with the chem-trailing. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16648993 United States 05/23/2013 02:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |