PIN! WashingtonTimes: U.N. comes after America’s guns Barack Obama’s OK of a gun-control treaty would destroy the Second Amendment

folks really congress has no authority?

Listen pay attention
we are totally Fucked if that be the international law

Is the US Lybia

Maybe

Last Edited by ISLANDIA on 08/19/2013 09:44 PM

Many UN troops use those calibers. No sweat.

I don't believe this will ever come to pass.

But... Have you all heard of Operation Blackjack?
Interesting scenario.

Maybe I should have reversed it and stated 14% of our military is in a position to fight government oppression and foreign intervention. I don't have any hard statistics I can quote, but I cannot see any more than that being free to help the citizenry. I agree that the troops overseas will be stranded to fend for themselves
,paraphrasing of course.

bottom line is the 14% will chose to help, will have to do so through a direct strike on the heart of the rogue rigeim.

I just want to ring their necks..

^^^
This!!!!!!!

It's all gradualism, making it harder and harder to get a gun, harder to get bullets, and so on unti pretty much everyone is disarmed.

Meanwhile, DHS has ordered 2.1 billion bullets including 450 million dum dum bullets.

+1

+1

Bring it.

The youtube videos would be fantastic!

:dictater:

Molon labe

BULLSHIT. Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia are definitely *not* anti-gun. Over a million hunting permits issued in 2011 in those three states, alone. I don't have stats readily available on how many deer and other game were taken, but anecdotal evidence would suggest that somewhere between 30 and 50% of hunters are successful in taking at least one quarry in a given season - one hell of a "rebel force" to be reckoned with, just within 100 miles of the District of Criminals.

The phrase, "Good luck with that", immediately comes to mind.

Logistics alone will break any large force attempting to stay highly mobile in such an environment; and guerrilla tactics will destroy by attrition any force which tries to dig in and "hold ground". That's the rock and hard-place of asymmetrical warfare, particularly when there are no "rear areas" where supplies are safe, and where troops can get R&R.

Draw a circle with a radius of 50 miles centered on DC - a large enough force (figure 12,000-15,000 troops) can take that in about 10 days. It will likely cost: 400~600 casualties among the invading force, 40~50 vehicles destroyed, and ~40,000-60,000 gallons of fuel burned (in 10 days). The operation will require some 480,000 pounds of food, medicine, and other consumables to be delivered to the field; that's 48,000 pounds of deliveries every day, on time, to all forces, or the net of control will begin to fail after as little as 24 hours without replenishment.

Now, double that radius to 100 miles...securing and obtaining provisional control will take at least 10 weeks and 50,000 troops, and it will cost 1300~1800 casualties, about 200 vehicles destroyed, and 500,000 gallons of fuel burned (in 10 weeks). The operation will require some 14,000,000 pounds of food, medicine, and other consumables to be delivered to the field - about 1,400,000 pounds per week.

Double that radius to 200 miles, and it will take between 10 and 16 months to "pacify" that much area with roughly 150,000 troops. Casualties will be in the range of 12,000~20,000 per year, vehicle losses will be well over 2500 per year, this force will require over 14 million gallons of fuel per year to remain operational, and will also require ~260 Million pounds of food, medicine, and other consumables per year. That is 270,000 gallons of fuel, and 5,000,000 pounds of supplies per week!!! This is similar to what Exxon/Mobile and Wallmart deliver each week in the entire US market east of the Mississippi river!

These figures for fuel and consumables do *not* account for losses due to sabotage or "piracy" by rebels, and therefore may have to be increased as much as 15~25% or more durring an extended campaign, where networks of rebel forces coordinate against resupply operations.

All personnel, materials, and supplies will require continual replenishment to every field location. On time. Under combat conditions. If Exxon and Walmart couldn't do it, who do you think can?!?

And this is still not even 20% of the contiguous US territory under "control".

In short, without aiding factors it would be functionally impossible to control and disarm even 50% of the territory known as CONUS. That is why they are so desperately seeking aiding factors, like a natural disaster and/or a grid down type of game changer scenario.

Amateurs think tactics...professionals think logistics.

Last Edited by LT Prepper on 08/19/2013 11:02 PM

See Colonel Prescott's famous line...

True Americans are no fools even though they may "appear" to be.

^pure awesomeness and truth

PA registered hunters = 933,000. Population 12.7 million.

There is a saying: During hunting season, PA has the 6th largest standing army in the world.

I also read somewhere that over 40% of registered PA voters are gun owners. That's 5.1 million people with the ability to fight back and fight on familiar ground.

Not thinking the UN would have an easy time in PA.

I understand all the "Treaties can't usurp the Constitution", and "congress will stop them", and "Obama would have a war on his hands if he does it". But what if he doesn't give a fuck and wants to speed up the clock on his totalitarian idea? What if he instigates this? What if by some god awful, they get this plan going? Don't dismiss the idea entirely, just believe that its improbable, not impossible.

agean no op of no and let me bs zero from my service and my forefathers

Not this shit again.

The intelligence of the backwoods rejects called the UN have not a clue as to what they are awakening. The desert sun seems to have baked their brains.

There is no treaty that trumps the Constitution.

Soon these idiots will be rounded up and arrested.

Look at all the keyboard warriors.

Yes just look.... you have not a clue.

It was this magnificent thing !!!

Obama took an oath to protect and defend the constitution.
If he signs that treaty, that means he is a traitor.

What is the punishment for treason?

Hey Blue Helmets, listen up! These words are for ye.

Excellent!!

Look at all the sheep led to the slaughter.

[link to www.youtube.com]