EQ Nuke | |
Catalyst (OP) User ID: 91191 New Zealand 09/11/2006 05:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 139257 United States 09/11/2006 06:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 114992 United States 09/11/2006 06:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 124957 United States 09/11/2006 06:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Bullshit. Tritium forms water on contact with free oxygen, or doesn't the idiot know that? But, then tritium is formed only if the materials used in the thermo-nuclear device permit the creation of tritium. So, we have fused Plutonium, Cesium, Iodine, Strontium and Yttrium in the shale. Oh, what fun that will be trying to decontaminate it. And expensive. The physics for the blast is all wrong, too. It's not going to break it up as he describes, unless you make the bore hole shallower, but then that would throw radiation into the atmosphere. Are Americans so freaking hard up for oil they would radioactively contaminate themselves? Jees, you people are sick. I guess so, you'll kill other for oil, why not kill yourselves. Got fuel to burn and roads to drive. I don't where he got the temperature data. I guess he doesn't understand that 29 PSI is going to force its way out the top of the bore hole and drag the heat with it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 114992 United States 09/11/2006 07:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Bullshit. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 124957Tritium forms water on contact with free oxygen, or doesn't the idiot know that? But, then tritium is formed only if the materials used in the thermo-nuclear device permit the creation of tritium. so before you ramble on, what conclusion can you deduct here ? and what was your motive for debunking it, i didnot quite copy that |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 114992 United States 09/11/2006 07:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 142266 Ireland 09/11/2006 09:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Negaterium User ID: 26222 Romania 09/11/2006 09:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 114992 United States 09/11/2006 09:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I would just say . To believe that a nuke was set up in GOM is plain stupid. Typical woo-wooish. Quoting: NegateriumI think youre judging too fast : its location was not on any fault line [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] and blasting is a common tool in oil exploration |
Mona Lisa User ID: 142394 Switzerland 09/11/2006 06:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Emperor Kenton User ID: 144097 United States 09/15/2006 10:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Solsearcher User ID: 18027 United States 09/18/2006 10:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 139944 United States 09/18/2006 10:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Emperor Kenton That is so much BS. I suggest you look at the OSC maps for oil leases in the Gulf of Mexico, you'll find there are few, if any, in the area of the earthquake's epicenter. The majority of oil production and exploration is way west of the earthquake epicenter in the Central and Western zones. |
Emperor Kenton User ID: 144097 United States 09/18/2006 11:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.cyberspaceorbit.com] The Jack #2 well was drilled to a total depth of 28,175 feet. [link to www.chevron.com] Don't the geologists seismic prospect? Air hammers or whatever tech they have now? Could a tremor have popped along a fault line in a weak spot? "New methods of seismic data analysis allow geologists to peer through once-murky salt deposits as they decide where to explore. A new generation of floating rigs also makes it possible to drill ever deeper holes." [link to www.csmonitor.com] |