To those complaining how lousy the photos from NASA's new Moon probe are | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 658394 United States 07/02/2009 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 716850 United States 07/02/2009 07:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 439828 New Zealand 07/02/2009 08:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: SunSpot Good quality fake moon models, what else have you got to show us sun? |
Texas Uncensored User ID: 716829 United States 07/02/2009 08:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Shills don't like clarity, Sunspot. Thanks for the link. **** PEACE **** UFO's @ [link to www.youtube.com] UFO photos & phenomena @ [link to www.picasaweb.google.com] MY GLP VIDEO CHANNEL * [link to video.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.futurequake.bravehost.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 548848 United States 07/02/2009 08:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So I was trying to figure if it resolves good enough to see the Apollo landing sites. It says the image on top is 1400 meters, so you can half that to 700, split that half into seven parts to image to see what objects 100 meters are like, then slip that again, etc. It looks like it should be good enough to photograph the landing sites |
Skeptic the First User ID: 716362 United States 07/03/2009 10:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 714298 United States 07/03/2009 10:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nomuse (NLI) User ID: 711198 United States 07/03/2009 04:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |