Why are the Illuminati IMMUNE to KARMA?

Who is to say the illuminati are evil?

the darkenated..

hows it goin alex my brother..

*bows

May I suggest instead of listening to the "ET crowd" you look into what the serious researchers have to say about the issue. Perhaps some Manly P. Hall? He makes it very clear that ever action has a reaction and much of the suffering we experience is a direct result of our actions.

As far as the Illuminati not having karma, I'm afraid that's an illusion that is maintained by our idea of success in this current paradigm. The inflict constant suffering on themselves with their actions but don't understand the relationship because they have cut themselves off from the source with their egomania.

For those interested, here's some MPH lectures on the subject...
[link to manlyphall.us]

Yup!

that mean they let you out of your cage?

man, i really need to meet your teachers..

*bows respectfully

They are all around you my brother / teacher!

They came as slaves; vast human cargo transported on tall British ships bound for the Americas. They were shipped by the hundreds of thousands and included men, women, and even the youngest of children.

Whenever they rebelled or even disobeyed an order, they were punished in the harshest ways. Slave owners would hang their human property by their hands and set their hands or feet on fire as one form of punishment. They were burned alive and had their heads placed on pikes in the marketplace as a warning to other captives.

We don’t really need to go through all of the gory details, do we? We know all too well the atrocities of the African slave trade.

But, are we talking about African slavery? King James II and Charles I also led a continued effort to enslave the Irish. Britain’s famed Oliver Cromwell furthered this practice of dehumanizing one’s next door neighbor.

The Irish slave trade began when James II sold 30,000 Irish prisoners as slaves to the New World. His Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies. By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat. At that time, 70% of the total population of Montserrat were Irish slaves.

Ireland quickly became the biggest source of human livestock for English merchants. The majority of the early slaves to the New World were actually white.

From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another 300,000 were sold as slaves. Ireland’s population fell from about 1,500,000 to 600,000 in one single decade. Families were ripped apart as the British did not allow Irish dads to take their wives and children with them across the Atlantic. This led to a helpless population of homeless women and children. Britain’s solution was to auction them off as well.

During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, Cromwell ordered that 2000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.

Many people today will avoid calling the Irish slaves what they truly were: Slaves. They’ll come up with terms like “Indentured Servants” to describe what occurred to the Irish. However, in most cases from the 17th and 18th centuries, Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.

As an example, the African slave trade was just beginning during this same period. It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of the hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated far better than their Irish counterparts.

African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (50 Sterling). Irish slaves came cheap (no more than 5 Sterling). If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African. The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce. Even if an Irish woman somehow obtained her freedom, her kids would remain slaves of her master. Thus, Irish moms, even with this new found emancipation, would seldom abandon their kids and would remain in servitude.

In time, the English thought of a better way to use these women (in many cases, girls as young as 12) to increase their market share: The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion. These new “mulatto” slaves brought a higher price than Irish livestock and, likewise, enabled the settlers to save money rather than purchase new African slaves. This practice of interbreeding Irish females with African men went on for several decades and was so widespread that, in 1681, legislation was passed “forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for the purpose of producing slaves for sale.” In short, it was stopped only because it interfered with the profits of a large slave transport company.

England continued to ship tens of thousands of Irish slaves for more than a century. Records state that, after the 1798 Irish Rebellion, thousands of Irish slaves were sold to both America and Australia. There were horrible abuses of both African and Irish captives. One British ship even dumped 1,302 slaves into the Atlantic Ocean so that the crew would have plenty of food to eat.

There is little question that the Irish experienced the horrors of slavery as much (if not more in the 17th Century) as the Africans did. There is, also, very little question that those brown, tanned faces you witness in your travels to the West Indies are very likely a combination of African and Irish ancestry. In 1839, Britain finally decided on it’s own to end it’s participation in Satan’s highway to hell and stopped transporting slaves. While their decision did not stop pirates from doing what they desired, the new law slowly concluded THIS chapter of nightmarish Irish misery.

But, if anyone, black or white, believes that slavery was only an African experience, then they’ve got it completely wrong.

Irish slavery is a subject worth remembering, not erasing from our memories.

But, where are our public (and PRIVATE) schools???? Where are the history books? Why is it so seldom discussed?

Do the memories of hundreds of thousands of Irish victims merit more than a mention from an unknown writer?

Or is their story to be one that their English pirates intended: To (unlike the African book) have the Irish story utterly and completely disappear as if it never happened.

None of the Irish victims ever made it back to their homeland to describe their ordeal. These are the lost slaves; the ones that time and biased history books conveniently forgot.
- See more at: [link to www.globalresearch.ca]

im not usually one for large walls of text, but that was worth the read.

thank you sir/teacher

They know how to transfer into a new body, that way they avoid the Karmic cycle and the mind erasing.

If they know how to transfer into a new body, is that mean whenever they reincarnated on earth, they wouldn't carry any of their past karma with them? What about their souls?

For the spiritual and religious teachings from Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, etc.: As you sow so shall you reap... is the law of cause and effect not apply to them?

Your opinions are welcome.

they just use frequency webs.. saturn relays of radio waves...probably bounced off the moon as well.

they also use memory manipulation so they don't even feel the guilt for their deeds...and the victim likely doesn't remember the crime or the culprit.

look up PKM Zeta.. and a drug called ZIP.

Last Edited by <%)oM34PrIm|(%>< on 03/01/2013 03:13 PM

They're not... All in due time..

Why do you think karma is the ultimate truth?

Karma is just a belief system of Hinduism.

Karma has become popular by the spirituality "trends" and has been accepted as the truth by many.

Just like we're not sure about heaven and hell, there is no way we can be sure if there is a concept like karma, for the living.

Shortly, karma is just another belief system.

They are not immune, no one is. They all do reap what they sow in either this life or the next.

They do not get away with anything, they and we just think they do.

They are not without souls, they just think money solves everything and makes you happy, we all know that is not the case, and so will they.

I've bumped into this title many times but skipped it, maybe it's time to dig into it.

I totally disagree. I'm a "victim" of almost instant karma any time I do something even a little bit shady (which isn't often).

if instant karma was the real deal, all politicians would be in death beds :)))

the fact that lightning can be witness no two times the same from different perspectives leads one to believe or perhaps more rightly said as know that karma is a personal agaenda, nothing more.

when there is nothing, there is no karma.

my thoughts, take with salt.

any thoughts ?


:))))

good.

elaborate please.

There is more to karma then getting ill. You'll probably find that they are unhappy in some way about something. It's not something you will read about in a news paper.

peace right back at you, but your statement is confusing :)

please repeat that with a more basic language :)

sadly, the reality or zeitgeist or lenses through which i view the world give god a personality more akin to electricity. does a light bulg care if it is lighting a whorehouse or a nunnery? god is the all, you are the all, one equals the other. if you know this, how can karma affect you unless you tell yourself you need a lesson to find your highest self.

rantings of the insane, pay little mind.

peace