THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...

Why exactly do you want to survive a wasteland?

Your info is cool as fuck, but why?

Think about it... You really want to pick up all the pieces?

First i would like to say thank you to lucus for the vid. And that i am only on page 44 so if what i ask or post has already been asked or posted then i am sorry for asking again.

Also i would like to say a few things about this coming nibiru and the end times. Jesus said that the world would not be destroyed by water but by fire. I have also seen and read many things about nibiru. It has been told its a second sun, the place of satan - ( his home planet ), the destroyer, etc. okay suppose that this nibiru does not just pass us but goes directly into us? For example, you take a tiny piece of paper ball it up and throw it into a fire, what happens to that paper? Is they anything left? The bible also says that the earth and the works will be burnt up. that the heavens and the stars will melt with a feverant heat.. Us ( meaning earth ) going directly into nibiru would cause this earth to be burnt up as nibiru is 3 times larger then us. Bible also states that men will try and hide in the rocks and mountains and will say fall on us to hide us from the son of men,etc... is that not what the ptb are doing? if we as a tiny earth are thrown into nibiru directly going inside a mountain or cave will not save you! if you put a penny inside a rolled up piece of paper and throw it into the fire that penny gets burned up also... okay another example, so maybe nibiru will not go directly into us, suppose it tags us and pulls us behind it directly into the sun? both of these things can happen, and the bible does say that the earth and the works will be burnt up... just my 2 cents...

The fire comes before the water.

He wanted you to think the fire was the end. And the water is the begining. Alpha and Omega is nothing more than the sewed seem between the begining and the end, a cycle, if you will. An orbit, even.

Jesus decieved you by only telling you half the truth.

ADMIT you cannot explain the Ancient findings scattered all over the world, i.e. Mayan, Egyptian, Sumerian, Pyramids, Stonehenge, Hopis, Hindu's, Biblical and other religious references!! etc etc etc

THE Problem is that you are SCARED.....

Our beloved space agency, NASA, announced in January 2009 that our wonderful solar system will be passing through the plane of the ecliptic of the Milky Way galaxy within three days of the Mayan Calendar's pinpoint of December 21, 2012.

I don't believe that NASA did any such thing. Please cite
the news release or article where you saw this.

From an astronomer:
"My claim is that nothing will happen on 21 December 2012 that is tied to the conjunction and that is of interest to the physical sciences. I explain my arguments below.

1.

The conjunction is not clearly limited to a single day, but covers a period of many years.

The Milky Way is a luminous band in the sky that can be seen only (sometimes) at night, outside, from dark locations far from city lights and other lights. The Milky Way has a fixed location amidst the stars in the sky. The annual path of the Sun between the stars in the sky crosses the Milky Way in two locations, near the constellations of the Archer and the Twins. So, the Sun passes through the Milky Way in the sky twice a year.

The southern solstice (the beginning of winter in the northern hemisphere, and of summer in the southern hemisphere) always falls around 21 December in the Gregorian calendar (around 11:13 UTC on 21 December 2012). The spot where the Sun then is between the stars slowly shifts between the stars, because of the precession of the equinoxes. In about 26,000 years that spot moves once around the whole sky (compared to the stars), roughly along the ecliptic (the annual path of the Sun between the stars in the sky), so the southern solstitial point moves through the Milky Way twice each 26,000 years.

The Milky Way has no very clear boundaries, but is on average about 12 degrees wide in the sky, and the solstitial point takes about 12°/360°*26000 = about 900 years to cover such a distance.

The Milky Way has no clear central line either, so there is uncertainty about when the solstitial point crosses that central line. Different groups of people can each use reasonable definitions for the central line that yet deviate from one another. If we estimate (for example) that the uncertainty about the "best" central line of the Milky Way is half a degree (which is only a small fraction of the width of the Milky Way), then the corresponding uncertainty in the date at which the solstitial point crosses the central line is 0.5°/360°*26000 = about 36 years.

The conjunction of the southern solstitial point and the Milky Way is therefore quite rare (it happens only once each about 13,000 years) but also lasts many years.

If you accept the central line that the IAU has defined for the Milky Way (see question 480), then (based on some experimenting with planetarium program Redshift 5) the southern solstitial point crossed the central line of the Milky Way already back in 1999. "
[link to www.astro.uu.nl]

... The Earths most abundant element is Oxygen... Earth is a star seed!

... The Earths most abundant element is Oxygen... Earth is a star seed!

... The Earths most abundant element is Oxygen... Earth is a star seed!

Actually, based on your statements here, I would have to say that earths most abundant element is "stupid". Lol lol

... The Earths most abundant element is Oxygen... Earth is a star seed!


Um, that is the one of the stupidest things i have ever read.

We have never, ever in human history, observed the birth of a star in real time.

Actually we have and do:
[link to www.jyi.org]

The denser a plasma is the more unstable it becomes as I understand it. The sun is a ball of plasma, it gains particles and density over time, (as well as emitting and ejecting particles) slowly from incoming dust and comets, it gets radiated by GAMMA RAY BURSTS, like our lasers in labs begin fusion experiments.

As we all know, we've entered a more denser part of the universe/galaxy, and these denser particles/plasma has been streaming into our solar system for a while now, I would say less than a decade, can't really be sure, but more than 2 years. If the sun does indeed gain density from it's surrounding environment then it will become more and more unstable and dense...

..................

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human
stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
-- Albert Einstein

The denser a plasma is the more unstable it becomes as I understand it. The sun is a ball of plasma, it gains particles and density over time, (as well as emitting and ejecting particles) slowly from incoming dust and comets, it gets radiated by GAMMA RAY BURSTS, like our lasers in labs begin fusion experiments.

As we all know, we've entered a more denser part of the universe/galaxy, and these denser particles/plasma has been streaming into our solar system for a while now, I would say less than a decade, can't really be sure, but more than 2 years. If the sun does indeed gain density from it's surrounding environment then it will become more and more unstable and dense...

..................

Hi Xenus, regarding your comment above and the previous dispute about the exact point of crossing of the galactic plane, do you believe the increasing density of the interplanetary plasma we're having now could be an effect related with the passage of Earth through "exact plane" of the Galaxy or even that this plane could be *defined* by this increased interplanetary plasma in some way?

Thanks.

I don't believe in anything, I only speak of what I know. This is not a belief, it is a fact, it is reality. The plasma has nothing to do with the "galactic plane". Plasma is everywhere, in different densities, compositions, temperature/energy levels. My threads on the matter have more than enough, there is no need for me to prove anything here, except it's time to stop believing and start facing reality.

can't hear shit. and also, that's a bunch of BS to say there were ZERo image results for norway spiral for a month.

I don't believe in anything, I only speak of what I know. This is not a belief, it is a fact, it is reality. The plasma has nothing to do with the "galactic plane". Plasma is everywhere, in different densities, compositions, temperature/energy levels. My threads on the matter have more than enough, there is no need for me to prove anything here, except it's time to stop believing and start facing reality.

I don't believe in anything, I only speak of what I know. This is not a belief, it is a fact, it is reality. The plasma has nothing to do with the "galactic plane". Plasma is everywhere, in different densities, compositions, temperature/energy levels. My threads on the matter have more than enough, there is no need for me to prove anything here, except it's time to stop believing and start facing reality.

I understand and my question was not in the sense of believing without proof or at least a "good reason".

I asked that having in mind that the rotation of the Galaxy around its center probably produces higher density of all types "massive radiation" (as opposed to photonic or zero mass radiation) in the region of its plane of rotation, which *is* the galactic plane.

In this case I would expected an increased interplanetary plasma when crossing this specific region (of the galactic plane). It's almost obvious that something like this should happen.

My question was also to see if you know if the plasma density is still increasing, or has stopped and start decreasing, etc. If its density has a known dependence with time for, let's say the last decade or so.

You apparently don't realize just how big space really is.
We will NEVER witness the birth of a star without some time
passing between it's birth and the safety of distance to
observe it, if we ever achieve the ability to travel like
that. On Earth it will always be many light years before
we could witness the birth of a star. Amateur astronomers
make a hell of a lot of discoveries all the time, no matter
what you want to believe.





"DR. P
How do you manage it. How???? The stupidity is too frustrating for me."

This is a hobby for me and has been since the mid 90s when I
cut my internet teeth on usenet. That battleground makes GLP
look very tame.

I don't believe in anything, I only speak of what I know. This is not a belief, it is a fact, it is reality. The plasma has nothing to do with the "galactic plane". Plasma is everywhere, in different densities, compositions, temperature/energy levels. My threads on the matter have more than enough, there is no need for me to prove anything here, except it's time to stop believing and start facing reality.

I understand and my question was not in the sense of believing without proof or at least a "good reason".

I asked that having in mind that the rotation of the Galaxy around its center probably produces higher density of all types "massive radiation" (as opposed to photonic or zero mass radiation) in the region of its plane of rotation, which *is* the galactic plane.

In this case I would expected an increased interplanetary plasma when crossing this specific region (of the galactic plane). It's almost obvious that something like this should happen.

My question was also to see if you know if the plasma density is still increasing, or has stopped and start decreasing, etc. If its density has a known dependence with time for, let's say the last decade or so.


You "obviously" don't get it. You should have known that the only plasma is the solar wind and dusty plasma like the interstellar dust, yet now we have "clouds" or "bubbles" of high density plasma streaming into our solar system, ones normally kept away by the sun's magnetic field. We've known the heliosphere was shrinking being compressed for decades, in the past 3 years the cosmic rays density and flux has been rising, solar wind dropping and many other anomalies.

The rise in cosmic ray flux is not coming from the sun, that alone should be enough to start asking if not the sun, then what? Put aside all these stupid, irrational beliefs like planet X, look at the facts, see that something is happening and then put it all together... There are many lies, but there is only one truth; Reality, the universe.

As we reach the true center plane for the first time in 88 million years

Consciousness is increasing, the more observatories we put in space, the more we see. I agree with you that the belief of PX is irrational. However, with the feverish search for whatever it is they are looking for, it certainly creates a buzz in the minds of the unrest!

Whether it be the search for deadly asteroids, or deadly gamma-rays, the space fever is only going to get worse. Knowledge can be dangerous.

The galactic plane (accretion disk) is a very crowded place, when compared to what we are used to. I could even go as far as to say that the Suns cycles are the result of unknown energy peaks, pulses from our galaxies black hole. As we reach the true center plane for the first time in 88 million years, the resonance is increased because there are more objects to reflect/amplify this energy. That includes more space rocks too!

The insanity of it all is that we can't actually do anything about it!