Users Online Now:
1,668
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
547,515
Pageviews Today:
850,129
Threads Today:
337
Posts Today:
4,509
09:29 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:SunDawnn:MV8xMDI5OTE1XzE2Mjg4MDY0XzhFODREOTQz] [quote:Anonymous Coward 771709] Ok. i am back from a nice motorcycle ride and I see not much has happened in this thread. WTF is wrong with GLP today? Is this not a major new piece of info worth discussing? I don't know who the mods are but I am starting to wonder based on the stuff that gets pinned around here and the stuff that gets ignored. (apologies if this is pinned by the time I post this) It makes total sense that they needed a plan to bring the buildings down before they could build them and those two towers could not be taken down using conventional methods. It also explains why building 7 went down how and when it did. It also explains why the fires lasted so long. But I am a little confused how they were able to hide the radiation. If it is true that they don't allow Geiger counters around there, if so, then we need to do more research on that right away. The more I think about this, the more I am hesitant to assume the US government was a victim just trying to minimize the loss. Although, I am open to the idea that the US might be blackmailed and could not do anything. Let's face it. There are a lot of missing nukes out there according to this guy. [/quote] I sorta agree. The way Dimetri is saying it is.....USA is a victim, kinda. I think as far as designing these massive buildings, they needed to keep in mind (and provide the technology of) how to bring them down later on should the time or event, arise. Back in the 60's, when erecting this complex, they probably had visions of lower Manhattan being highly populated as it clearly, was. So if you apply the mind-set of: "everything that goes up, must come down" then, they might've just been planning for a degenerative/old-age sort demise/ending of these buildings in years to come. So I can see why, part of the 'deal' back then was, 'if you build it then, you must have a device to bring it down when the time comes'. And I can further see why this 'plan' wouldn't go over too well with the citizens (Clients). I mean, who would want to rent an office on-top of a nuclear device that "may" accidently (or purposefully) go off? It's sneaky on NY's part but understandable (in a real sinister sorta way!). (I am on part 16 and still trying to figure out this Russian missile thing) Whose submarine was it? [/quote]
Original Message
Part - 1:
Part - 2:
Part - 3:
Part - 4:
Part - 5:
Part - 6:
Part - 7:
Part - 8:
Part - 9:
Part - 10:
Part - 11:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5DeeHCCROg&feature=channel
Part - 12:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-TbpezpY0c&feature=channel
Part - 13:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhgS17l-PZo&feature=channel
Part - 14:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXk1-Ut7_ks&feature=channel
Part - 15:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMXdWK3KTGY&feature=channel
Part - 16:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYf5-iw6vok&feature=channel
Part - 17:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGHxFXB2Vew&feature=channel
Part - 18:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bto0KbFtqKs&feature=channel
Part - 19:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17H6sp-FyiA&feature=channel
Part - 20:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MW9CsWi2aDk&feature=channel
Part - 21:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TYP8JHGRsE&feature=channel
Part - 22:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x77s9lxt7t0&feature=channel
Part - 23:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgClEUxLXRk&feature=channel
Part - 24:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQDHAN3aQAg&feature=channel
Part - 25:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5q64FW0uiI&feature=channel
Part - 26:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0Wbh32W2uc&feature=channel
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>