Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 2,152 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 1,021,744
Pageviews Today: 1,413,981	Threads Today: 390	Posts Today: 6,724
11:46 AM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject ARIZONA TO PUSH A LAW TO STOP BIRTH-CITIZENSHIP RIGHT FOR ILLEGALS!!! WIN WIN WIN

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:Anonymous Coward 939950:MV8xMDc5NTE1XzE3MTg5MTU1X0NBOUFFREIy]
[quote:HEBGB 964530]

There's only two ways this would happen:

1.) Arizona secedes from the union

2.) The 14th Amendment is repealed

[b][u][color=red]All persons born or naturalized in the United States[/u][/b], and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.[/color] No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

An illegal alien is NOT a resident of the US, or any State other than the country the come from. They are also NOT subject to the jurisdiction of the said State because they are not a citizen.

They are subject to the laws of their country and must be deported UNLESS they commit a CAPITOL or felony offense while on our soil, then it becomes an INTERNATIONAL offense and that gets into some heavy shit.....

The 14th ammendment is not meant in the context in which you are interpreting it. It was meant to protect the rights of emmancipated slaves and US citizens from being prosecuted or asked to leave other states after the civil war.

The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was adopted after the Civil War as one of the Reconstruction Amendments on July 9, 1868.

The Fourteenth Amendment provides a broad definition of citizenship, overruling the decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), which held that slaves and their descendants were not citizens of the United States and were not entitled to Constitutional rights.

Its Due Process Clause has been used to apply most of the Bill of Rights to the states. This clause has also been used to recognize substantive due process rights, such as parental and marriage rights, and procedural due process rights. Certain steps are required before depriving a person of their life, liberty, or property.

The amendment's Equal Protection Clause requires states to provide equal protection under the law to all people within their jurisdictions. This clause later became the basis for Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Supreme Court decision which precipitated the dismantling of racial segregation in the United States.

The amendment also includes a number of clauses dealing with the Confederacy and its officials.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
[/quote]

Convienient this amendment ALLEDGES all blacks on the continent were slaves from africa ..

pretty clever ruse since it was instututed by military governors through threat of force ...

So they free the slaves only to TELL THE SOUTHERN GOVENRMENT that the 14th amendment must be passed([u]to make all freed slaves subjects, along with the whites[/u])

Real good amendment ...
[/quote]

Original Message EPIC!

THEY MUST BE SUPPORTED!

[link to www.kpho.com]

Immigration Enforcement Debate May Not Stop With SB 1070

PHOENIX -- E-mails to and from Ariz.state Sen. Russell Pearce reveal the immigration enforcement debate may not stop with SB 1070, the controversial immigration law.

Pearce, R-Mesa, the author of Arizona’s immigration law, has been writing to some of his constituents about what he plans to accomplish next.

In e-mails obtained by CBS 5 News, Pearce said he intends to push for a bill that would enable Arizona to no longer grant citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants born on U.S. soil.

Pearce wrote in one e-mail: "I also intend to push for an Arizona bill that would refuse to accept or issue a birth certificate that recognizes citizenship to those born to illegal aliens, unless one parent is a citizen."

* Document: E-mails To And From Pearce

CBS 5 Investigates looked through hundreds of e-mails Pearce had sent to constituents and some of their replies. The e-mails varied from praise to criticism and outlined Pearce’s future plans. Most were about SB 1070, his immigration law.

E-mails from the law’s supporters outnumbered those from critics by seven to one.

One supporter wrote, "I think it is about time we take our state and country back from the Mexicans."

One opponent wrote, "Mr. Pearce, you are a sick, racist bigot..."

Pearce replied to some opponents: "Do you not care about the deaths…maimings…billions in cost to America..."

One of the more remarkable e-mails sent to a list of supporters detailed his next steps. The e-mail, several pages long, includes articles critical of the 14th Amendment, which gives babies born on U.S. soil automatic citizenship.

One of the e-mails written by someone else but forwarded by Pearce reads: "If we are going to have an effect on the anchor baby racket, we need to target the mother. Call it sexist, but that's the way nature made it. Men don't drop anchor babies, illegal alien mothers do."

In response, Pearce sent two e-mails to CBS 5 News that contain some of the reasoning he used to conclude that children of illegal immigrants should not be granted citizenship. He also said he's disappointed when people think he's mean spirited because he stands for America.

Pearce said his new idea is not only legal but it's also constitutional.

“It’s common sense,” Pearce said. “Again -- you can’t break into someone’s country and then expect to be rewarded for that. You can’t do it.”

When Pearce was shown the e-mail referring to “anchor babies” that he forwarded, he said he didn’t find anything wrong with the language.

“It’s somebody’s opinion… What they’re trying to say is it’s wrong, and I agree with them. It’s wrong,” said Pearce.

Pictures (click to insert)





\| Next Page >>