Users Online Now:
1,627
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
21,437
Pageviews Today:
29,484
Threads Today:
19
Posts Today:
160
12:14 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 21858603:MV8xMTEzNTg2XzM1OTQyNzIxXzQ2M0Y0RTE5] I was going to post his last night, but something suggested I wait. We have all been taught there are 4 Bases in DNA but in 2011 it was discovered there were 6 http://www.news-medical.net/news/20110722/Scientists-discover-new-bases-of-DNA.aspx http://news.discovery.com/human/genetics/new-dna-sequence-110727.htm I will just point out some scientific skulduggery. We had completed the Human Genome project before 2011. That means it is wrong unless it includes the two extra Nucleotide bases[and the two other bases discovered after that, I can't find the links ATM] does anyone see any problems in genetics and genetic studies? Wiki does not currently carry the information about the extra bases on it's page about DNA. If we are inside a construct it is constructed fractally, we will never find any ultimate answers within the construct because there will always be something more to find and see. This is the nature of fractals, a 2D one can have the circle drawn around it but it has infinite surface area. Science will never find all the answers pursuing the methods they do. Some say this is deliberate. The unseen controls the seen. This is almost as well celebrated as "As above so below, but a little different" is amongst those who study that which was forbidden by those who kept the secrets. Those that dabble in altering reality will also say the unseen controls the seen. What goes unseen does not mean it goes unnoticed. I have seen other storylines being developed. Many people may not be aware of the NETWORK that runs thought the constructed conspiracy scene, one solid Arm of the octopus operated by Intel agencies. Stories are floated and other less incredible stories are attached until it forms some credibility by being refereed to regularly by may CT nuts.[Touchstones] There are lots of these pre-existing stories around that get built off. If you criticize these stories or make your own stories that are not connected to these "Seed" stories you get a public ticking of from the boys in the NETWORK. This NETWORK runs from the MSM to the so called credible ALT media [who just work for the same people, you don't get to be the head of a Multinational corporation without selling out] to the outright fruity end of the scale where we hang out. These groups all co-operate with the official "Stories" and dismiss any who may have a different point of view or who sees through the stories. Successful story lines aways tap into pre-existing scripts that are well known or part of popular culture, they are embedded, where possible, into people subconscious. Anyone in the ALT media who is "High up" and is former military watch what they say and don't believe they are not still working for Intel agencies. Read what they say carefully and you will start to see bigger patterns of which the Bezerk story is just a useful portion in the form it was first presented. Next year some people are planning on putting fully encrypted CT sites on the Internet Kim Dotcom style to stop and Intel snooping or even knowledge of who is who exactly unless people want to say who they are openly on sites. We will see more information come out than ever seen before as whistler blowers will not get betrayed by those who they thought were legitimate places to publish vital information. It will be bit like Wikileaks live in real time. When people who really served in the military tell the public what they were really doing all these stories will be well exposed and so will the people behind them and who they were working for. In a vacuum of information the first information that is disclosed will be likely to be the most believed. How do you know what is going on in the world beyond you? How do you know those sources are truthful? [/quote]
Original Message
My girl friend has a D.E.D link on her laptop from the French Embassy. (She works at the embassy)
Crazy traffic on DED
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>