Users Online Now:
1,659
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
647,616
Pageviews Today:
832,186
Threads Today:
218
Posts Today:
2,808
07:17 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 30857551:MV8xMTEzNTg2XzM2MzMzNDQwX0ZGQ0JFNURF] [quote:integrator and the op:MV8xMTEzNTg2XzM2MzMyMzYxXzcwOUM2MkE=] [b][color=darkblue]BHD ~ At last this BEZERKER Site is getting really interesting![/color][/b] 5. To cap it all, do we, I ask myself need to evaluate the [b][color=darkblue]SQUIDGY [/color][/b] input you mentioned, and include it in this equation? Ask yourself, is he putting out here, the current official interpretation of "AuGie"? [/quote] No, SQ has never followd the official storyline, and indeed, encouraged me to question it. SQ's intel is just as legitimate, and ironically verifiable by the OPs own recount of what was in the brief cases. For the OP to attack SQ, is an attack on his own story. (this occured well before the official openning, and revealing of the contents. At the time, an explosive charge was the front runner.... not a ceramic container, with the residue of the organism in it. Another thing not mentioned by the op is that the case contained a relic. These relics, when viewed in conjunction with the revitalised substance did things. Perhaps things described by the vatican. The meeting in India was a symbolic return of these relics to their rightful owners/keepers, who are truly nobodys, but protectors of areas considered vulnerable on this Earth) [quote:integrator and the op:MV8xMTEzNTg2XzM2MzMyMzYxXzcwOUM2MkE=] This "substance" is 100x more toxic then anything known in chemical science that is currently available in the public domain. It is however speculated that the "substance" is at least 30x more toxic then anything in classified military and biowarfare labs. [/quote] Some things are not meant to be touched by man, directly. Not meant to be used by man directly. The arrogance that we can do as we please, with anything on this world, is ridiculous. The stuff is toxic, but not intended to be, as we should never have invoked it in to the open. The same way homeopathic medicine can induce the same benefits of a particular remedy in a small body of water, from just one tiny shadow of the original essence is a great way to view what is being described above. Military scientists will always assert a threat level, ironically based on how much damage THEY could inflict on an enemy, if THEY used what ever thing they were looking at. It's perspective. If viewed as a weapon, sure its bad. If RESPECTED for what it is, you would never go near it, or touch it. Just leave it be. Any ancient culture would have immortalised such an entity in song, dance and art as simply a no-go zone. [quote:integrator and the op:MV8xMTEzNTg2XzM2MzMyMzYxXzcwOUM2MkE=] The "substance" can effect/interact with every organic and inorganic "matter".: on a molecular/atomic and DNA(for living matter) level. It effects both- living and non living "subject matter". From annalists reports it is clear that the new "substance" has alarming reanimation properties.;; "dead" matter can become "living" matter.. some started to send out frequencies as was the case with artifacts in the vatican and other museums; From close Chinese sources we have learned of three[3] exceptions. 1) The first is of course H20(water) which seem to be some kind of catalyst: [/quote] This may have been the notion at the time, as they had no idea what they were playing with. But now, why do you think the world's scientific and military complex is inundating Antarctica? To get to a vast body of the stuff beneath the ice. Water is a carrier of vibrations, and intent, and gives life. But the organism, if you will, is the life component that can create anything. It is the intent of the planet in material form. Diluted in bodies of water, it has sustained and developed life on this world for eons. No wonder venter is creaming in his shorts. Blank canvasses, of truly alien life forms (not made by this world) ready to be breathed life in to. What will inhabbit these chimeras, on a soul level I wonder? These arseholes want the mother load - not just a small invoked/prevoked sample at Macondo. [quote:integrator and the op:MV8xMTEzNTg2XzM2MzMyMzYxXzcwOUM2MkE=] 2) Ceramic/Terracotta is somehow not effected and can be used to "handle" the dried matter of this substance. [/quote] SQ described the material as opaline. A white glassy substance. The op went on to describe the material in the canister as excrement, where as SQ said it was dried residue. i.e. a waterless remnant. Litterally just add water! [quote:integrator and the op:MV8xMTEzNTg2XzM2MzMyMzYxXzcwOUM2MkE=] 3).) Currently the only living organism it doesn't effect detrimentally/fatal is the Nomura JellyFish. One Chinese source has revealed that the NomurA jellyFish actually thrive and grow in size, and exponentially in numbers, when introduced to this "substance". With the help from Japanese researches China has developed a mechanism where they can "program, control and command" the Nomura jellyfish in swarms. Testss have shown that China now has the the ability with S.IM to direct millions/billions of jellyfish to attack/cling to to the hull of any surface and subsurface target vessel and disable it(decommission/redundant)(translation problem). ..China has the ability with their new weapons:: (Reverse EMP or S.IM or Array) to create a type of "force field" around a target vessel. The vessel is then lit up like a beacon for the Nomura's to home in and swim/move towards saID target or to terraform:.: a specific region/area. [/quote] Jellies are nearly all water. They have no brain. Different to how we work as a total organism, but exactly how our cells work. Each cell has no brain, just dna. If you like they are a giant cell, capable of holding specific water (I believe there are many types) and information that can be enabled by this pure intent. If you could work out a 'bridge' between how the planet channels thoughts to them en-mass, you have an RC device. Trust MAN to weaponise it, or want that use. Jury is out for me on whether it is actually a weapon, or a dissarmament device. An anti-weapon. There is a distinct difference. Anyone dissarming another's weaponry would be considered an agressor by that army. Again its all perspective. [quote:integrator and the OP:MV8xMTEzNTg2XzM2MzMyMzYxXzcwOUM2MkE=] Just to clarify, the "substance" is the secretion/feces left by the organism. [/quote] My gut says that is wrong, and that the stylisation of the substance to be a secretion or faeces, is an attempt to create a 'creature' rather than a faceless, liquid with pure intent. Spin. Mind you I am doing the same... [/quote]
Original Message
My girl friend has a D.E.D link on her laptop from the French Embassy. (She works at the embassy)
Crazy traffic on DED
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>