Users Online Now:
1,910
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
2,294,867
Pageviews Today:
3,187,938
Threads Today:
748
Posts Today:
15,017
11:59 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:nexuseditor:MV8xMTEzNTg2XzE4NzY1NzMwX0Q2Q0MyM0RB] [quote:Anonymous Coward 1069391] .... snip OP reports that Israel has a super-sub in the Gulf which can dive lower than any of the other submarines and it becomes somehow “blocked” in GOM by other submarines. OP reports four theatres of activity. We are not sure of the locations. OP reports organism has been contained. Missouri then reports it is “excepting” the protocol. The US Navy is agreeing to the protocol. This could mean that the Missouri is on its way to other waters. OP reports that US Navy Operatives onboard the Israeli submarine have signaled that the Sampson option has been disabled. The Samson option may have been intended to initiate WIII. [/quote] Valid assumptions - given the ambiguous nature of much of the information available. I have a couple of slightly differing options to throw in: - the 'problem/organism/ from down there (in the GoM), has either arisen 'naturally' as a result of sea-floor changes; or caused by man, ie sonic drilling, or both. This organism has definitely been encountered before by the Russians. (They have had a few strange sub accidents over the last decade or two). - other info suggests the Russians, around June 20, gave technology and info to various assets - which can be used to protect vessels from whatever it is, and further, which could 'fix' the problem. My take is that the Russians consider whatever it is to be a global threat. Info suggests that the Russians basically gave the Americans 101 days (ends Sept 30) to fix the problem with this new tech/info - else they will come in and do it themselves with whoever else was aboard the agreement/protocols. It would appear that the Russians certainly have the agreement of various nations on this. - the 'Israeli' sub was clearly NOT acting in concert with the other nations' vessels. I suspect it was a 'black' sub, which has the ability to give off any 'call sign' of any nation it wanted, within reason. This could explain the presence of other nation's special forces units aboard. Maybe this mission was so sensitive that they were all keeping an eye on each other? I suspect that this 'Israeli' sub - was there on behalf of the non-US Navy part of the Govt - with its own option/technology to 'fix the problem'. Maybe it was going to do something more drastic to stop whatever the problem was - hence the Samsom Option reference. Options here range from some super secret weapons technology (likely); to blowing itself up to plug a gap/kill the problem (who knows). - it would appear that the Americans, who have been holding out from coming aboard this agreement/protocol - have just recently 'come aboard'. But - I notice that it seems to be the US Navy that has accepted the protocols - does this automatically imply the US Govt? Given that the US Navy is a virtual entity unto itself, and that it has been openly discussed by the French on the DED channels that it would consider a coup against the rest of the USA if martial law was declared - maybe only the US Navy is 'aboard', and not the rest of the US? I wonder whether they came into agreement after this most recent 'Israeli' sub incident; or before it. I'd say that information was obtained down there by that sub - which lead to decisions being made, which lead to a change in plans, so to speak, for the sub. This would explain the fight amongst the crew on the sub. - sooo - does this mean the Americans or Russians are STILL going to 'nuke/whatever' it is down there that worries them all so much? Will the technology being used to 'fix' the problem be detrimental to the local inhabitants of the GoM? If so, would they be told to evacuate? Or does somebody desire another disaster to use - say for martial law and tightening the grip on the public - in which case they would not be told. Looking at Obama and his kids swimming in the gulf, and eating the local seafood - I'm thinking that there is no plan to move people out of that area at all. Far from it. or maybe the whole organism/splash zone problem in the GoM will be fixed without anybody in the public (except for GLPers) even knowing the situation existed in the first place. Through the posts of the OP, we have had a very limited and narrow glimpse of another layer of what goes on behind the scenes. How nations and factions will cooperate on some things, then, with a sudden change of information - are competing with deadly force. We see how much activity happens which never makes mainstream news. One has to wonder, how many other potentially HUGE situations like this have come and gone in the past - and we never heard a twinkle about any of it? peace [/quote]
Original Message
My girl friend has a D.E.D link on her laptop from the French Embassy. (She works at the embassy)
Crazy traffic on DED
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>