Users Online Now:
1,188
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
251,074
Pageviews Today:
319,561
Threads Today:
64
Posts Today:
1,015
02:46 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Welcome to the New World Order (government owns your children)
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 968016:MV8xMTcyMTkzXzE4OTYxMTQyX0M3OTNFMzZD] Senators line up to tell U.N. to leave kids alone 31 already committed to oppose treaty giving world body oversight of parents Thirty-one Republican senators have agreed to oppose the United Nations' "Convention on the Rights of the Child" treaty, and critics of the international plan to vest children with a long list of rights – such as a right to seek government review of parental decisions – are looking for three more names. Among the provisions of the treaty, according to the Parental Rights website: * Parents no longer would be able to administer reasonable spankings to their children. * A murderer aged 17 years, 11 months and 29 days at the time of his crime no longer could be sentenced to life in prison. * Children would have the ability to choose their own religion while parents would only have the authority to give their children advice about religion. * The best interest of the child principle would give the government the ability to override every decision made by every parent if a government worker disagreed with the parent's decision. * A child's "right to be heard" would allow him (or her) to seek governmental review of every parental decision with which the child disagreed. * According to existing interpretation, it would be illegal for a nation to spend more on national defense than it does on children's welfare. * Children would acquire a legally enforceable right to leisure. * Teaching children about Christianity in schools has been held to be out of compliance with the CRC. * Allowing parents to opt their children out of sex education has been held to be out of compliance with the CRC. * Children would have the right to reproductive health information and services, including abortions, without parental knowledge or consent. http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=193361 [/quote]
Original Message
There is no turning back, society has been conditioned to accept their enslavement.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>