Users Online Now:
1,812
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
451,187
Pageviews Today:
734,939
Threads Today:
242
Posts Today:
4,609
08:59 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
++I AM A EXTRA TERRESTRIAL++ ASK ME A QUESTION AND I WILL RESPOND++
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:A scientist who cares 384437:MV8xMTgzMTFfNzkzNzM4OF9DODQwMDhBMQ==] Hi again, Hi Wispy, So... for dating techniques being perfect, of course they are not and of course there are some limits, as with any other method... the important thing is not loosing this point and yes... be very careful... try corroboration, seek for corroboration from different methods, from different sources. Whereas the techiques are not perfect, we have already several of them, of different natures, to test and search for explanatory power... and it is often tried. So Wispy, when the rocks are dated with preference to the fossils... it is for discernible reasons, for suitability for accurate estimations based on geological knowledge of the structures being analyzed, not just by desire or simple confortability or prejudice from the scientists involved. Fossils tell so a discernible story of life (even if it is incomplete) that it is possible to find "fossil indicators" (and we know of plenty... that`s "common" fossils from organisms that were rather common or not so much but were easily preserved in the fossil record) THAT make it much more easy to determine stratigraphic dates by comparison, and "obviate" the need of "costly" dating techniques in plenty of cases. This is much more different than saying what you had, think about. The comparisons had been proved and if there are doubts... they are just tested again by the best methods available. Lead presence is a non point in most cases and "marker pollution" is not so dominant and ellusive as you may think. I know that science is not perfect, and yes... text books are often more imperfect and usually incomplete, but i cann`t agree with you on what seems a large dismissal with unproperly described issues. It`s not just like that, please! Just think that some issues are so complex that you cann`t just expect to get a comprehensive knowledge of them by reading basic science text books, and not even particular and very specialized scientific text books... the road is pretty wider, much much more wide and difficult, as it should be in this amazing world ; ) Best wishes, A scientist who cares [/quote]
Original Message
HELLO EARTHLINGS,
I am a extra terrestrial and I have been reading your webforums and magazines and watched your t.v channels and monitored your phone calls
I have decided to be the first alien to let himself be asked questions and answer and that all on GLP.
I await your questions
LIVE LONG AND PROSPER...V
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>