Users Online Now:
1,432
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
418,333
Pageviews Today:
634,173
Threads Today:
236
Posts Today:
3,115
07:20 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Jehovah's Witnesses persecuted in Bulgaria (Graphic)
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Nine's 1140990:MV8xNDU0Nzc0XzIzOTk4MTYwXzQ1RTA1QkU0] [quote:Anonymous Coward 1317855] [quote:Nine's 1140990] [quote:Anonymous Coward 1269039] [quote:Anonymous Coward 1317855] [quote:Nine's 1140990] [quote:Anonymous Coward 1269039] [quote:Anonymous Coward 1317855] And if the medical community would allow seawater transfusions we wouldn't be having all these problems with blood and people dying because they won't accept it. Seawater was experimented with before WWI and many sick people were cured of all sorts of problems. Heck, even coconut water was used in wars to save people. Blood was and still is very dangerous. Leave it to the medical community to keep using blood when there are other alternatives that are also cheaper. http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=seawater+blood+substitute&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 [/quote] Blood is a body fluid not a SIN, you dipshit. If you lose enough of it, you will die. [/quote] Read your first sentence again. A body fluid. Even a VET can replace body fluids with blood substitutes.....dipshit. [/quote] Obviously he didn't read about safer substitutes. Even most doctors won't take blood and go the way of bloodless surgery. They aren't idiots but will push it on others. They have seen how blood can also kill and make someone very sick. So many safer alternatives could be used. But the witnesses can use hemoglobin and blood fractions that are not whole blood. Whole blood is rarely ever used. [/quote] As I mentioned before, I had a family member die because of a lack of real blood which would have saved him easily. However, they tried all the things you mentioned, but they don't deliver the oxygen that whole blood does, not even close. Furthermore, what fucking religious and moral sense does it make to allow fractions of someone else's real blood, but not their whole blood? What kind of head bangin'bat shit nonsense is that? That's like saying that a hamburger isn't really a hamburger until is has ketchup on it. [/quote] I'm sorry about your family member, but they could just have easily been added to this 35,000. The 35,000 listed for serum hepatitis. This doesn't count the other transfusion deaths: To return directly to the question - How often does death by blood transfusion occur? It’s difficult to say. Remember, "The Centers for Disease Control estimates that as many as 35,000 deaths and 500,000 illnesses a year may be due to the presence of serum hepatit[i]s in blood for transfusions." http://www.mybloodsite.com/content/are-deaths-blood-transfusion-common [/quote] Thanks for the link! [/quote] You're very welcome! [/quote]
Original Message
Only true Christians would react with such dignity and peace.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>