Users Online Now:
GLP Poker Rooms
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Math: 6÷2(1+2) = ?
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 32057798:MV8xNDczMDcwXzM1NTY5Njc0XzVERTMzNjUy] [quote:Anonymous Coward 29097718:MV8xNDczMDcwXzM1NTY3OTc2XzU4NkU2Nzcw] [quote:Anonymous Coward 32057798:MV8xNDczMDcwXzM1NTY3OTQ5X0UzRkMyOTIy] My 4 year old can type 9 and call people morons. Back it up with something. Read THIS for example: Distribute 2 into the parentheses. Why? because it is a factor of the original terms INSIDE them, and cannot be ripped apart. I will show you why: 6 = 4+2 = 2(2+1) = 2(3) The 2 is a common factor of 4 & 2. No matter which way you view it, the value 6 MUST maintain its value. Just as you cannot take the 4 from (4+2) and divide it into a number with the "+ 2". I cannot take the 2 from 2(2+1) and divide it into another number without the (2+1). You ARE allowed to distribute before division, or any other operator, since you are allowed to simplify any equation first. There are MANY references which state "Remove parentheses by distribution" Try Googling that as a search term. 6÷2(2+1) = 6÷(4+2) = 1 Now, some people have argued that you don't NEED to distribute the 2; you just add the 2+1, and end up with 2(3). Then they go on the say that this is the same as 2*(3). WRONG! You STILL have parentheses and STILL need to distribute that 2 inside them, for the reasons discussed about factoring above. Therefore you have this: 6÷2(3) and must distribute like this: 6÷2(3+0) = 6÷[2(3) + 2(0)] = 6÷6 = 1 These people who get 9 try and rip the 2 away from the parentheses by inserting a times symbol like this: 6÷2*(3), and then do the division of 6÷2 first. I explained the illegalities of doing this, since the 2 is a factor of the 2+1. Lastly, 6÷2 is NOT (6/2), as in (6/2)(2+1). This is totally incorrect, since it lacks that parentheses in the original equation. Check any online or written text. Leading fractions as a coefficient ALWAYS have ( ) around them. I hope this clears things up. Regards. [/quote] This is so wrong, it is not even funny. The fact that you wrote up this whole thing is down right hysterical. I weep for our society. p.s. I work for a Univeristy. I have comfirmed the answer is 9 from 3 different math professors, excel, and my own solution. You sir are a nitwit. [/quote] Saying it is wrong, doesn't make it so. Proof anything I said to be other than true. Let me ask you this: Assuming the Identity Law is correct in saying a = 1a = 1(a), what is the answer to: a/1a = ? [/quote]
Alright, there's a lot of self-proclaimed experts around these parts. Let's see how your logic holds up against some basic mathematics.
6÷2(1+2) = ?
I'll give two hints. This is
a trick question, and there is only
All tools used for computation are fair game.
(Yes, I saw this somewhere else and decided to post it here.)
Best of luck to all you geniuses .
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
WHOOPS - IRS HAS MALFUNCTION - REFUNDS DELAYED
Now even your own children will be fined by Obama's government under harsh new Obamacare penalties called 'incentives'
Food stamp recipients use taxpayer-funded benefits to pay their drug dealers
An overweight society in denial: junk food companies continue to profit as obesity is normalized
Lax regulations allow cosmetics industry to sell products contaminated with infectious pathogens
DHS Official Thinks People Should Have To Give Up Their Anonymity To Use The Internet
Shocking Study — “BPA-free” Plastics No Safer than BPA, Causing a Slew of Debilitating Side Effects
Congressional Rep Who Introduced Anti-Swatting Bill... Victim Of Attempted Swatting
Feds: We can’t disclose FBI records because then public would know how FBI works
A GPS Tracker for Kids Had a Bug That Would Let Hackers Stalk Them
Documents Reveal Drug Firms’ Schemes to Maximize Profits on Cancer, AIDS and Heart Drugs
58 ADMITTED False Flag Attacks
Police across America are forcing high school students to take breathalyzers
Learn How To Spot Fake Honey At The Grocery Store. Your Health Depends On It
Biometric Banking Technology On Its Way To ATMs
DC BILL WOULD PAY PEOPLE STIPENDS NOT TO COMMIT CRIMES.
Children as young as 13 to be asked whether they are ‘gender fluid’, ‘demi-girl’ or ‘intersex’
The world's first robot-run farm will harvest 30,000 heads of lettuce daily
Satanists to give prayer at Phoenix City Council meeting
The Coming Hive Mind: Man/Machine Merger and the Global Transhuman Society
Constitutional Attorney Explains the Actual Cause of the Oregon Standoff
Emails Show Flint Govt Bought Clean Water for Themselves While Residents Drank Poison for a Year
Private Corporation Giving Cops Free License Plate Scanners in Exchange for All Data they Collect
New Gov’t Task Force Calls for Screening Every Adult, Pregnant Women for Depression
Meet Vigilant Solutions – The Private Company Storing 2.2 Billion License Plate Photos & Selling the Data
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd. Godlike™
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2015 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.004s (3 queries)