Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 1,116 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 133,331
Pageviews Today: 231,175	Threads Today: 81	Posts Today: 1,571
03:05 AM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject Archons exposed... make sure you read the whole thing,

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:Archon 1003003:MV8xNTE0NjE0XzI0OTgwMjcwX0IwODkzOUYy]
[quote:Dynamitrios]
thanks for the input, much appreciated,... and to any ones reading, detach the whole thing from christianity and it s related mythology, it s a complete different cosmology
[/quote]

NP, great subject.  Here's one last bomb to round it out...

excerpt : John Lash comments on ‘The sacred creation story of the Mysteries (Sophia Mythos)’  = same article as posted by OP
http://www.metahistory.org/GAIA%20SOPHIA/Synopsis9SM.php

[b]Who Wrote the Reptilian Agenda?
By John Lash[/b]
<Edited by Robert D. Morningstar>

http://www.ufodigest.com/article/who-wrote-reptilian-agenda-john-lash

[b]The Origin of the Annunaki Script[/b]

A Collector's Edition entitled "Secrets of the Da Vinci Code," published by US News and World Report, features a brief interview with James Robinson, general editor of the Nag Hammadi Library in English. Correcting Dan Brown’s reference to the Nag Hammadi texts as scrolls, Robinson points out: “They are codices – books with individual pages. They are actually the oldest example we have of leather bound books.”

Amazingly, whatever the significance of their content—and we have yet to comprehend what that might be—the Nag Hammadi Codices (NHC) are the earliest surviving examples of bound books.  Close reading of these arcane materials shows that Gnostics, as teachers in the ancient Mysteries were called, were deeply concerned with an alien intrusion upon humankind.

Entities they called "Archons" appear to be identical to the ETs of modern UFOlogy.  The codices indicate both Gray and reptilian types: namely, a reptilian or "drakonic" type and and a neonate type, suggested by the image of a prematurely born fetus.  The former are the overlords, the latter, servile, robotic drones who obey a hive-mentality.  The NHC do not contain graphic physical descriptions of these alien intruders, but present ample information to profile them comparatively with the two types of ETs most widely discussed today.

[b]Alien Profile[/b]

Perhaps one-fifth of the intelligible material in the NHC concerns the origin, methods, and motives of the "Archons," also called "authorities, governers."
 
Their name derives from arche-, "first, from the beginning," because, according to Gnostic cosmology, they emerged at an early stage of the solar system previous to the formation of the earth.  These bizarre entities may be regarded as a locust-like species of cyborgs with silicon-based bodies so designed to permit only brief forays into the earth's oxygen-rich atmosphere. They inhabit the solar system at large, traveling among the planets in alien-engineered spacecraft.  Gnostics texts hint that they may be compared to custodial engineers of the inanimate clockwork mechanism of the system. Some, but not all, UFO sightings and abductions may be attributed to them.

Although archons do exist physically, the real danger they pose to humanity is not invasion of the planet but invasion of the mind.

The archons are intrapsychic mind-parasites who access human consciousness through telepathy and simulation.  They infect our imagination and use the power of make-believe for deception and confusion.  Their pleasure is in deceit for its own sake, without a particular aim or purpose. They are robotic in nature, incapable of independent thought or choice, and have no particular agenda, except to live vicariously through human beings. They are bizarrely able to pretend an effect on humans, which they do not really have.

For instance, they cannot access human genetics, but they can pretend to do so, in such a way that humans fall for the pretended act, as if staged events were taken for real.  In this respect, archons are the ultimate hoaxers. This is the essence of "archontic intrusion," as I call it.  The trick is, if humanity falls under the illusion of superhuman power, it becomes as good as real, a self-fulfilling delusion.

In the cosmic perspective, the archons present a dynamic aspect of the evolutionary scenario of humankind, through which human potential is tested. The Gnostic view of their role closely matches the "flyers" in The Active Side of Infinity, the last book of Carlos Castaneda, who says that the flyers are "the means by which the universe tests us."  There are numerous close parallels between Castaneda and Gnostic teachings.

This profile of the archons is not speculative.  It follows what can be gathered from the Gnostic writings.  For instance, NHC texts describe how the archons attempted to rape Eve—clearly a mythological rendition of genetic intervention. Such passages appear to support the claims of alien interbreeding so widely discussed today.  But in the Gnostic account, the alien intruders did not succeed in this act of cross-species intervention: they tried but failed.

The notion that archons present a test to humanity—explicitly stated by Castaneda if one accepts the archon/flyers correlation—can also be traced in some NHC writings, [b][color=darkblue]especially The Apochryon of John.  That text suggests that the Aeon Sophia, the cosmic intelligence of the earth, engages the archon species and uses their deviant and deceptive influence for such a purpose[/color][/b].  The account of how the overlord of the authorities "committed adultery with Wisdom (Sophia)" and binds humanity to "a chain of blind compulsion (hiermarmene)" is baffling, to say the least (NHC II, 1:28.16).

[b][color=darkblue]To sort out and clarify what the Sophianic narrative may have to say about the test of the archons is a great challenge to our understanding of the Gnostic message and how it can benefit humanity today[/color][/b].

[b]A Cosmic Error[/b]

The sacred creation story of the Mysteries (Sophia Mythos) explains that the archons arise due to an anomaly in the cosmic order.

“The world system we inhabit came about by a mistake” (NHC II, 3:75.5).

This startling line alludes to the Gnostic view that the planetary system we inhabit resulted from the impact of a massive power surge from the galactic center—in mythological terms, the "fall" of the goddess Sophia.

Sweeping over a region of lifeless atomic matter in the galactic limbs, this tsunami of core energy produced a planetary system complete with a resident species, the locust-like archons.  At first the planetary system was a merely whirlpool of agitated matter, like a beehive under construction with bees swarming around it.  Then it became centered on a newborn star, the sun of our solar system.

The fallen goddess myth says that the earth was not formed in the same manner as the rest of the solar system.  The other planets conglomerated from vast fields of inert atomic dust, but the earth grew organically from the original plume of core energy; that is, from Sophia’s alive, animating, self-awareness, a pure torrent of galactic luminosity (Organic Light).

Weird as it might sound, this view is not incompatible with modern astronomy.

Science affirms that the solar system at large is dominated by inorganic chemistry that does not support life as it occurs in the terrestrial biosphere, where organic chemistry is the norm.  This being so, how did the organic, life-bearing part of the solar system, the planet earth, evolve from the non-organic part that does not support life as it appears in the terrestrial habitat?

Are we to assume that the anomaly of organic life within the solar system evolved from the inorganic planetary matrix, and that Life evolved from the non-living?  If that were so, how it could happen has not been demonstrated or proven by science.  It has been assumed as a dogma (called abiogenesis), but not proven.

Were they here today, Gnostics would argue that the solar system has two distinct dynamics, organic and inorganic, because the earth is the metamorphosis of a surge of super-alive animating power from the galactic center, while the solar system, the habitat of the archons, is the product of inert atomic matter impacted by that surge. The observation of the difference between the inorganic and organic aspects of our solar system led James Lovelock to formulate the Gaia Hypothesis.  In my book, "Not in His Image," I show how key points of Gaia theory correlate to the Gnostic cosmology of the gallen goddess, Sophia.
Sophia is the name Gnostics gave to the animating intelligence of the earth before it become this planet.  In their view, the cosmic origin of our planet is present to us here and now as wisdom, the living, all-informing intelligence of nature.

[b]Sophia is the Anima Mundi, or " the soul of the world."[/b]

Entire John Lash essay here, http://www.ufodigest.com/article/who-wrote-reptilian-agenda-john-lash
[/quote]

Original Message [link to www.metahistory.org]

The text is self explanatory... enjoy... and contemplate... it gets MOST interresting towards the end

Pictures (click to insert)