Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 2,150 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 1,180,543
Pageviews Today: 1,974,281	Threads Today: 792	Posts Today: 13,619
07:54 PM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject repost: OK, ANOTHER SCARY AS SHIT AUSTRALIAN DOCO ON FUKUSHIMA

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:Anonymous Coward 14438657:MV8xNTk1ODgyXzMwNjM0ODgzX0UzMjM5QjIw]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 1527598:MV8xNTk1ODgyXzMwNjM0ODM5X0UwMDJBQkY1]
[quote:I live in Perth. 14438657:MV8xNTk1ODgyXzMwNjM0NjQyXzMyMEZDOUIw]
[quote:citizenperth:MV8xNTk1ODgyXzMwNjM0NjEyXzRGNzgzREY1]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 14438657:MV8xNTk1ODgyXzMwNjM0NTMyXzdGMDhFMTJF]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 1527598:MV8xNTk1ODgyXzMwNjM0NDU2XzJGRkRFODg2]
[quote:I live in Perth. 14438657:MV8xNTk1ODgyXzMwNjM0NDI0XzhFQjIxRjZE]
Hey OP.

Tell us about LNT ( The Linear No-Threshold ) with regards to radiation.

Do you feel any exposure to ionizing radiation is harmful?
[/quote]

Well we will never know won't we since LNT is merely theory.
[/quote]

If it's just a theory why are people proclaiming any exposure to any form of ionizing radiation is a threat?
[/quote]

any form of irradiation is harmful.

What is q cover-up. is simply because it was always harmful... you know it, I know it .. they know it... so wherein is the question...

we have deadly shit daily over the planet... SIMPLE....

and i go to bed hating anyone that denies it....
[/quote]

Sorry, but you a clearly speaking bullshit.

"Any form of irradiation is harmful"

REALLY. When was the last time you ate a banana? Or flew across the country on a plane?

http://xkcd.com/radiation/
[/quote]

Please don't insult my intelligence by throwing in the banana argument.
Frequent flying gives you  indeed a higher risk of getting cancer. So do X-rays at your dentist or in hospital.
Since we are on unknown territory here we simply don't know the long term effects of Fukushima.

We do however know the relatively long term effects of Chernobyl and these are still grim up to this day.

Since Fukushima is far worse than Chernobyl, Chernobyl didn't had MOX fuel and was covered with concrete and boron  acid relatively quick, we can only assume that we are in deep trouble.

So you can downplay whatever you want but history doesn't lie.
[/quote]

Ahh no, we can downplay the fear mongering simply based a exposure levels across the world. It would take an incredible amount of exposure over and above natural background radiation levels for a start to even contemplate the disaster scenarios such as the OP is suggesting.

As for the long term effects of Chernobyl, Greenpeace were preeminent in trying to scare the world in trying to blame any cancer link to the disaster. I'll follow up shortly. It in incorporates "So you can downplay whatever you want but history doesn't lie" into this line of thinking.
[/quote]

Original Message ok, this is a repost... but i was trolling my own threads for information for someone else, and thought it still valid.....

Link to Video of 60 Minutes Australia report, including cross-coverage from Chernobyl.....

[link to fukushimaemergencywhatcanwedo.blogspot.com]

we are SO Doomed....

perhaps another pin... this shit should STILL be out there.... It hasn't stopped people......

Peace out

Citz:

Pictures (click to insert)





\| Next Page >>