Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 1,319 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 312,642
Pageviews Today: 410,256	Threads Today: 131	Posts Today: 1,553
03:32 AM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject OWS prepares for cold weather. Some consider trespass.

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:JadeDone:MV8xNjg1ODQ3X0YwMzk3MjA3]
I was reading an AP article in my local paper about the OWS preparing for winter conditions and part of the article really stood out to me.

[b][i]"Some movements are scouting locations indoors, including vacant buildings or other unused properties, possibly even foreclosed homes, though some question the wisdom of holding a protest outside the public eye.

Lighting campfires is probably out of the question in most places because of safety regulations."[/i][/b]

The full article is here. http://www.columbian.com/news/2011/oct/28/wall-street-protesters-prepare-winter-weather/

Since it is AP, it appears in many other places as well.

I sure this comment does not reflect the views of the majority of OWS, however, some apparently are more concerned with their movement staying visible than their pending decision to commit illegal breaking, entering and trespass.

Their choice not to light fires since that would go against safety regulations must make up for any other lawlessness in their minds.

I think a priority check is in order.
[/quote]

Original Message I was reading an AP article in my local paper about the OWS preparing for winter conditions and part of the article really stood out to me.

"Some movements are scouting locations indoors, including vacant buildings or other unused properties, possibly even foreclosed homes, though some question the wisdom of holding a protest outside the public eye.

Lighting campfires is probably out of the question in most places because of safety regulations."

The full article is here. [link to www.columbian.com]

Since it is AP, it appears in many other places as well.

I sure this comment does not reflect the views of the majority of OWS, however, some apparently are more concerned with their movement staying visible than their pending decision to commit illegal breaking, entering and trespass.

Their choice not to light fires since that would go against safety regulations must make up for any other lawlessness in their minds.

I think a priority check is in order.

Pictures (click to insert)





\| Next Page >>