Users Online Now:
2,399
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,920,442
Pageviews Today:
2,661,514
Threads Today:
648
Posts Today:
12,445
08:23 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
DUTCHSINSE — Moon verified to be out of place — ‘Lunar Anomaly’ — Planet X / Tyche / Nemesis would have to be 30AU
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:F=ma:MV8xNzA1NTI2XzI4MjAyMzA2XzIyRTE5NDY0] [quote:ChuulRa 5543551:MV8xNzA1NTI2XzI4MjAyMjEwX0QzNUI2QTI3] [quote:F=ma:MV8xNzA1NTI2XzI4MjAxOTc5X0UyM0QzNTBB] [quote:ChuulRa 5543551:MV8xNzA1NTI2XzI4MjAxODA1X0E1MDg4NUQx] [quote:F=ma:MV8xNzA1NTI2XzI4MjAxNzM0X0YyN0VBMUI5] [quote:ChuulRa 5543551:MV8xNzA1NTI2XzI4MjAxNjQxX0NDOTdBOUM2] [quote:Anonymous Coward 1767206:MV8xNzA1NTI2XzI4MjAxMzEyXzJFMjJDRUQy] One question...Astro just debunked Cornell University? Did I hear that right? [/quote] Debunked Nibiru facts ??? lol Well we all can debunk something if we want to. Look at our sol system if you tell me that this is just Nature that created the "Unbalance" style then please go back to physics. [/quote] And what "facts" do you claim that support the existence of Nibiru? [/quote] Just look at sedna, oh i know you debunked that too. Well look at plutos or Uranus Orbit oh thats normal. Well then just wait. [/quote] It would really help if you used words to explain your thoughts and not assume people are psychic. I can guess what you are talking about but I would rather not. If you are unable to express yourself maybe you should rethink the whole idea of posting to begin with. Sedna, what about it? It has an unusual orbit that may be the result of a large, Oort cloud planet. But an Oort cloud planet is not Nibiru. There are no astronomers that say a large Oort cloud planet cannot exist, just that one has not be discovered. Orbits of Pluto and Uranus, you mean the anomaly that was explaine in 1993? If you are refering to R. S. Harrington's proposed Planet X to explain discrepancies in the orbital predictions of Uranus and Neptune. http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1988AJ.....96.1476H&defaultprint=YES&filetype=.pdf The you should be aware that in 1993 it was resolved that the “anomalies” in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune disappear when the mass of Neptune is corrected to the mass determined by Voyager 2 http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1993AJ....105.2000S&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf It was a simple correction that did not require the existence of another planet. And again, that planet in no way looked like ficticous Nibiru. But of course you will not accept this because you have no training in science so scientists cannot possibly get it right. Only you can see the "truth". [/quote] "But of course you will not accept this because you have no training in science so scientists" Made me laugh hard for someone that cant use logic if someone throws just a bone for someone so he could chew a bit on it but you just ignore the facts and go back to the old crap that could be "Faked" "Manipulated" or something else. You live in a world where every source has to be right because they have more IQ then you. Check again IQ is just a tool to hold you down Mr.Right. And one more, i could really tell you my deep thought about that kind of crap but it was already talked about years ago and they just forget and let it rott outside. Senda is the best fact that there are other forces that we don't know about.As some "Scientists" said that Sedna could not exist as the forces of the Sun are to weak to hold Sedna in that kind of orbit. [/quote] So you confirm exactly what I said. You know nothing of science and everyone has to be wrong because you have to be right about something. At no time did I mention anything about faked or manipulated data. This is just a straw man argument on your part. And you are wrong about Sedna, not suprisingly. What was said about Sedna is that the orbit is unstable and it could not have presisted in its current orbit for very long. It clearly can exist in its current orbit, it is there. So the implication is another, large Oort cloud object kicked Sedna into its present orbit. But neither object is Nibiru. Or do you just use the term Nibiru for anything you do not understand? [/quote]
Original Message
Well, got this seconds ago via Twitter from Dutchsinse
[
link to adsabs.harvard.edu
]
Download PDF here:
[
link to arxiv.org
]
"Dutchsinse:"
They explain in this paper from Cornell University that THEY CANNOT EXPLAIN why the moon is showing an “accelerating phenomenon”.
They do calculations based upon the location of “X” .. X being the distant point where the supposed “planet x / nemesis / tyche” is located.
This paper acknowledges two things..
ReadMore:
[
link to sincedutch.wordpress.com
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>