Users Online Now:
1,714
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,064,520
Pageviews Today:
1,960,772
Threads Today:
698
Posts Today:
14,563
10:08 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
CHEMTRAILs are what???
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 6845027:MV8xNzQwOTIyXzI4ODY2ODAxXzE5MEI3RTQ0] [quote:Anonymous Coward 3053613:MV8xNzQwOTIyXzI4ODY2NzU4XzE2RkM3NTk4] [quote:SnakeAirlines:MV8xNzQwOTIyXzI4ODY2Njc1XzVCQjkwMTkw] [quote:George B:MV8xNzQwOTIyXzI4ODY2NjQyX0VFRjBDN0Yw] [quote:SnakeAirlines:MV8xNzQwOTIyXzI4ODY2NTY0XzM3RTNCRTFF] [quote:Anonymous Coward 3053613:MV8xNzQwOTIyXzI4ODY2NDM1XzNDNTExMEZB] if a flare with chemical compounds is strapped to the wing of a plane and lit what would it emit? a big enough one is going to look like giant smoke lines...*cough* chemtrails its hard to try to debunk something the government owns up to imo [/quote] Do yourself a favor and look up the burn time and 'appearance' of a cloud seeding flare before you look even more stupid than you do now... Pay attention at 40-50 seconds: [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bsBwwOx4Fk&feature=relmfu[/youtube] [/quote] Why do you detractors insist that aerial dispersal of aerosols have to be visible. . . [/quote] You're an idiot...Stop proving it... "I" did not say they had to be visible..."I" am the one that proved to the other idiot (You know, the one my post was directed at that isn't you) that cloud seeding with flares is not leaving a visual signature that could possibly be misinterpreted as a contrail... Do at least try and keep up... :tool: [/quote] dont be an ass and assume that because im not a genius in one area that makes me an idiot. [/quote] Maybe not...but it does, by definition, make you ignorant about that one area. And if you are ignorant about a subject, why would you be discussing it? To PROVE that ignorance? [/quote]
Original Message
1) all trails in the sky are CHEMTRAILs, contrails are a subset of contrails
2) all trails in the sky are contrails, CHEMTRAILs don't exist
3) some trails in the sky are CHEMTRAILs but most trails are contrails
4) CHEMTRAILs are persistent trails, contrails are not persistent
5) CHEMTRAILs nor contrails need be visible, visibility is coincidental
6) CHEMTRAILs are very rare but are occasionally seen
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>