Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 1,415 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 339,827
Pageviews Today: 534,188	Threads Today: 201	Posts Today: 3,263
05:57 AM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject How the Illuminati Really Began.

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:Anonymous Coward 5856285:MV8xNzUwMzIyXzI5NDI1MTUxXzJBMTU3QTc4]
It is said that one cycle of the Mayan's the long count calendar would begin in the year 3114 B.C. (according to our modern Gregorian calendar).

The most commonly accepted correlation is the Goodman-Martinez-Thompson correlation. The GMT correlation establishes that the 0.0.0.0.0 creation date occurred on September 6, 3114 BC (Julian) or August 11, 3114 BC (Gregorian). This correlation fits the known astronomical, ethnographic, carbon dating, and historical sources.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10037864

You can read more on this here: [link to www.world-destiny.org]

I am not convinced though as it seems that no astronomical evidence exists for the correlation, and calendars are based on astronomical cycles. Cycles of Venus do not take thousands of years.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10037864

It is all based on galactic seasons and ecliptic alignments, in some cases syzygy's. In this case, the earth moon sun alignment is said to align with the galactic ecliptic. What will come of it? No one is sure, but 3114 B.C sounds like the era of the great inundation and collapse of the Sumerian civilization.

It must be remembered that Lunar influences plays a large part in /meso American Tzolkin. This last 260 day cycle is predicated on this.

[link to files.vsociety.net]
 Quoting: Dionysian Fullaflatus

Nothings being denied, The fact is even scientific consensus doesn't know. Nasa quotes the fact that there is no defined or ascribed galactic ecliptic:

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012-guest.html

Even the most quoted of the bunch Carl Calleman and John Major Jenkins don't agree on dates. Calleman claims Oct.28th and Jenkins the 12/21/2012 date. Who's to know.
[/quote]

Original Message The beginning.................

Pictures (click to insert)





\| Next Page >>