Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 2,510 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 1,157,080
Pageviews Today: 1,800,056	Threads Today: 751	Posts Today: 11,157
04:41 PM

Back to Thread

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:AnonPhysicist 1406242:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTA4NzE2X0NFNUZFQjhG]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 74444:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTA2MzU1X0Q0RUNBMERF]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 1406242:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTAyNTU2X0M2MEExQTgx]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 74444:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzODYzMzg4XzZDMzE3NDE5]
Doh.  Take 2.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist]
 
[b]No one has ever attempted to disqualify this theory, though it is falsifiable hundreds of different ways experimentally.[/b]

[/quote]

Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
[/quote]

[quote:Anonymous Coward 74444:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzODYzMzg4XzZDMzE3NDE5]
Doh.  Take 2.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist]
 
[b]No one has ever attempted to disqualify this theory, though it is falsifiable hundreds of different ways experimentally.[/b]

[/quote]

Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
[/quote]

1)Prove the production of electricity from a photovoltaic cell is not the result of electrons in the form of light being intercepted by the atomic structure of the photovoltaic material and converted to normal low electrons. (By the way, the function of photovoltaic cells is most succinctly explained by my theory)

2)Prove that light frequency energy cannot be conducted by the same materials as electricity in the non EMR form. Radio antennae and wires being used to conduct EMR are in almsot every electronic device, and are conductors of electrons. Repeated experiments mentioned in early debates involving plants producing photosynthesis in total darkness using metal plates and conductors will get in your way though,as well

3)Prove that the energy of electromagnetic radiation is not directly related to it's velocity, speed amplitude and frequency, in other words prove that the particle I suggest is not moving the precise distance and velocity to produce the energy it does using the classic 1/2M X V2 formula. (I give the simple math proving this in my theorem)

4)Prove that and momentum can exist without mass

5)Isolate and fully describe the "photon"

Agent, I could go on an on and on if you wish.
[/quote]

None of those experiments seem to *prove YOUR theory.*  These experiments seem to be about disproving the mainstream theories.  And, in fact, they aren't experiments at all.  Your attempts at disqualification of the mainstream theory (which is a classic argument from ignorance) have nothing to do with experimentally verifying YOUR theories.  The closest you got was with plants, in #2.

You are the one proposing the idea.  Propose with each of the above a specific experiment that will be explained and predicted by your theory, and if the experiment fails, will FALSIFY your theory.  Do you understand?  Can you?
[/quote]

You asked for me to provide five methods of disqualifying my theory, and any one of these will do.
You obviously know nothing of the scientific process. As the "Mexican" shill pointed out, it is very difficult to prove a negative, thus quantum theory is still be tacked onto with gaudy science fiction
[/quote]

Original Message Look at this photograph, it's the lasco c2 image. notice the particles:
[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]

For the first time in 11 years, this NOAA space weather website is not responding:
[link to www.n3kl.org]

According to what we a re seeing on the lasco c2 image, this data is falsified:
[link to www2.nict.go.jp]

The pressure should be much higher!

Normally, the position of the sun would be apparent on this graphic , usually with a low flux reading during a quiet period:
[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

Again, I am absolutely positive that solar data and space weather data is being withheld and falsified, and looking at the lasso c2 image it is quite apparent there is an unusual event occurring and an intense outburst of radiation, a very severe x ray flare from a sunspot that is rotating into position to become noneffective within 5-7 days.

This turn of events does not bode well and I am absolutely certain after observing theses data spreads fro 12 years that the information is being falsified.

Pictures (click to insert)

News