Users Online Now:
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:AnonPhysicist 1406242:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTEzODgxXzYwQzQyQ0U5] [quote:Anonymous Coward 74444:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTEwMDY0XzkyOEIwQkJF] No. Very specifically I wrote: Carefully and completely spell out five different [b]experiments[/b] that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory. Can you propose any [/quote] The methodology you utilize is not my concern, nor is how you conduct your experiment, but proving any of the 5 things I outlined will disqualify my theory beyond reasonable doubt. [quote:AnonPhysicist 1406242:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTA4NzE2X0NFNUZFQjhG] You obviously know nothing of the scientific process. [/quote] [quote:Anonymous Coward 74444:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTEwMDY0XzkyOEIwQkJF] At least as much as you do, apparently. [/quote] If you believe qua tum physics is falsifiable and my theory is not, you don't shit from shinola about science or the sceintific method and how it has been hijacked. There is no way to disprove quantum physics because the people who control the academic process and have billions at stake have gatekeepers preventing it, killing when it becomes necessary. It is actually very simple to disqualify quantum physics, special relativity and general relativity, and has been repeatedly by empirical observations made daily. [quote:AnonPhysicist 1406242:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTA4NzE2X0NFNUZFQjhG] As the "Mexican" shill pointed out, it is very difficult to prove a negative, thus quantum theory is still be tacked onto with gaudy science fiction [/quote] [quote:Anonymous Coward 74444:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTEwMDY0XzkyOEIwQkJF] It is difficult to prove a negative. However, it is possible to create experiments that WILL FAIL if conditions are not met, [/quote] I gave you five, whether you realize or acknowledge it is of no consequence to me. [quote:Anonymous Coward 74444:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTEwMDY0XzkyOEIwQkJF] and thus allow the idea in question to be falsified/modified. For example, if you stick to the Newtonian F=G(M1*M2)/R^2 (as you seem to want to do), and use it to account for the bending of light in a gravitational field, you only yield about half the result of what is actually observed. [/quote] you pulled that figure out of your ass, it varies with frequency and though I have not fully worked out the details of why higher frequencies are bet less, it seems intuitively exactly what you would expect. You are NOT dealing with a linear motion with light, it is a particle traveling in sine waveform. [quote:Anonymous Coward 74444:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTEwMDY0XzkyOEIwQkJF] See? Falsifiability. Can you propose specific experiments that allow YOUR idea to be falsified? [/quote] Whether you acknowledge it or not , there are thousands of ways to prove light does not consist of electrons vibrating passively to an oscillating magnetic field. The fact that you cannot falsify a theory does not mean it is not falsifiable if it is not valid. There seems to be lot of confusion among the academically educated (brainwashed)/ Tell me how to falsify quantum physics in way you will accept. If matter exceeding light speed doesn't do it, what will?If proving kinetic energy cannot exist in the absence of mass doesn't do it, what will? DON'T YOU GET IT, I am not a simple mind and I do not commit to memory as fact that which defies reason and contradicts what I already know to be fact or that which I cannot prove to myself as fact. In the word of tradiational academia, you either do this or you fucking FAIL YOUR COURSES. [/quote]
Look at this photograph, it's the lasco c2 image. notice the particles:
link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov
For the first time in 11 years, this NOAA space weather website is not responding:
link to www.n3kl.org
According to what we a re seeing on the lasco c2 image, this data is falsified:
link to www2.nict.go.jp
The pressure should be much higher!
Normally, the position of the sun would be apparent on this graphic , usually with a low flux reading during a quiet period:
link to www.swpc.noaa.gov
Again, I am absolutely positive that solar data and space weather data is being withheld and falsified, and looking at the lasso c2 image it is quite apparent there is an unusual event occurring and an intense outburst of radiation, a very severe x ray flare from a sunspot that is rotating into position to become noneffective within 5-7 days.
This turn of events does not bode well and I am absolutely certain after observing theses data spreads fro 12 years that the information is being falsified.
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
The universe really is a hologram, according to new science
Are You Ready for Riots?
Bloody School Massacre Staged for Canadian Police Training, Over 100 Participants
Pyramids and the coming economic collapse
Stephen Colbert Tells David Keith Government is Already Spraying Us « GeoEngineering Exposed
International Space Station in partial shutdown due to cooling pump problem
Facebook stock will be added to Dow Jones S&P index
Payment Due: The Obamacare Deadline No One Is Talking About
NYPD to Roll Out Police State for Super Bowl
No laughing matter: Comic Relief invested in tobacco, alcohol and arms firms
Rockefeller attaches cybersecurity bill to National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) 2014
Snowball Fight at Univ. of Oregon Could Lead to Criminal Charges
The Occult On Wall Street: The Art Of Financial Astrology
Obscure Government Agency Brings Criminal Charges against 107 Bankers, but Stays Clear of Wall Street
Is Your Job About To Be Outsourced By A Computer (The Probability Is 47%)
General Electric Knew Itís Reactor Design Was Unsafe Ö So Why Isnít GE Getting Any Heat for Fukushima?
Colleges canít ban guns, rules Florida court
CIA Document Suggests U.S. Lied About Biological, Chemical Weapon Use in the Korean War
Genetic differences between "identical" twins discovered
Missouri School District Hit With $150,000 Bill for Obamacare
Creepy AI Telemarketer Sounds Human, Denies Being a Robot
Possibility of Cloning Quantum Information from the Past
How nanotechnology can trick the body into accepting fake bones
What Is Happening To Alaska? Is Fukushima Responsible For The Mass Animal Deaths?
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Invested Millions in Scandal-Plagued Private Prisons,
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd.
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2014 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.004s (3 queries)