Users Online Now:
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 74444:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTM5NTE1X0FCQ0U3M0VF] [quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1221979:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTMxMDE1XzY4QjE5OUVB] [quote:AnonPhysicist 1709374:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTIwNzA4XzhGODg4QzQ2] To me the most important consideration and most interesting fact if all was that he did NOT answer a single question posed to him despite his many references in the manner I suggested using empirical proofs. [/quote] [quote:Anonymous Coward 74444:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTI0NDU0Xzc2NkQxRDI2] I linked to entire experiments isolating the photon, and proving its existence -- experiments you can duplicate with the right equipment. I asked you questions specifically about validating what you claimed. I linked to all sorts of sources having exactly the information you claimed wasn't on the internet. [/quote] No sir, you did not. If the existence of the photon had been proven and it had been isolated, it would not be considered theoretical. [/quote] Sigh. Didn't even *look* at the links I brought up. Here they are again, for your convenience. In 1986, Grangier, Roger, and Aspect performed an elegant experiment to isolate single photons. Conceptually very simple, their approach was to examine correlations between photodetections at the transmission and reflection outputs of a 50/50 beamsplitter. To quote the experimenters, ‘‘a single photon can only be detected once!’’ Hence, if a single quantum of light is incident on the beamsplitter, it should be detected at the transmission output or at the reflection output, but not both: there should be no coincident detections between the two outputs. The experiment is proof of the existence of photons. http://people.whitman.edu/~beckmk/QM/labview/labview.html Others have repeated and refined the experiments. http://people.whitman.edu/~beckmk/QM/grangier/Thorn_ajp.pdf Here's a nice slideshow that even *you* can understand. http://people.whitman.edu/~beckmk/QM/inter/AAPT_03.pdf See also: http://www.tp.physique.usherbrooke.ca/experiences_fichiers/Bell/Programme/Bell-old/Beck_QM_Manual.pdf http://www.nobeliefs.com/photon.htm http://www.bourbaphy.fr/grangier.pdf http://www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results/final/QCD/Q05A/Q05A.html http://www.eng.yale.edu/rslab/projects/singlephoton-faq.html http://scienceblogs.com/principles/2010/08/05/whats-a-photon-and-how-do-we-k/ http://www.bourbaphy.fr/grangier.pdf [quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1221979:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTMxMDE1XzY4QjE5OUVB] You might have tremendous technical resources at you disposal, [/quote] That's a laugh. I have several computers, an internet connection, and knowledge about how to actually DO research, and cite sources. What tremendous technical resources do I have that you don't? [quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1221979:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTMxMDE1XzY4QjE5OUVB] but you have shit for brains. Too bad really. [/quote] Ad Hominem noted. As usual, it's all you have. [quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1221979:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTMxMDE1XzY4QjE5OUVB] [quote:AnonPhysicist 1709374:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTIwNzA4XzhGODg4QzQ2] Theory is not proof, no matter how many people [i]appear[/i] to agree, [/quote] [quote:Anonymous Coward 74444:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTI0NDU0Xzc2NkQxRDI2] Exactly. And you provide no *proof* of your electromagnetic theory of everything. You give *no way* to falsify it. You propose *no experiment* to validate it. [/quote] There are and endless number of ways to disqualify my theory, but not if it's right. That's YOUR problem. You can't get past since my theory cannot be falisified that it is not falsifiable. [/quote] Of course it can! That's the whole point of a scientific theory! A scientific theory must: - be empirically testable or lead to testable predictions or retrodictions (use present information or ideas to infer or explain a past event or state of affairs) - make verified predictions and/or retrodictions - lead to reproducible results so others can double-check - include criteria for determine whether data is factual, artifactual, anomalous or irrelevant A scientific theory must help us understand the nature of our data. Some data may be factual (verify the theory's predictions or retrodictions); some may be artifactual (result of secondary or accidental influences); some are anomalous (valid, but at odds with predictions or retrodictions); some are irreproducable and thus invalid; and some are irrelevant. You not only create experiments that succeed if your idea is true, you also design experiments that will FAIL if your idea is true. But you haven't spelt out a way to test your theory at ALL. Above is spelt out exactly the experiment used to isolate photons, step by step. Why can't you design something similar? What experiment do you propose, as the creator of the Electromagnetic Everything theory, that will fail if your idea is correct? Spell it out. If you CAN'T, it is NOT a scientific theory. A true scientist should be the loudest single critic of his or her own theory. Otherwise, it's just an idea. Why is this so difficult for you to understand? [quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1221979:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTMxMDE1XzY4QjE5OUVB] You don;t even know what I said even means. If the theory is wrong the energy calculations won't add up, but THEY DO, with the electron's know mass. [/quote] Excellent! Let's see some of those added-up calculations, step by step, line by line, truth table by truth table. If Archimedes can do it with floating bodies, surely you can with your hyper-intellect. [quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1221979:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTMxMDE1XzY4QjE5OUVB] [quote:Anonymous Coward 74444:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTI0NDU0Xzc2NkQxRDI2] It isn't science. It's the IDW-religion. As is your belief in my being anything but an individual posting counter to you on the Internet. Your idea (it isn't robust enough to be considered a theory) will remain such until you do the work of experimental prediction, verification and falsification. The closest thing we have to an experiment validating your ideas is to see how your prediction goes this December, in which the internet will be broken, millions of people killed, including me, by the 21st. If your prediction, which you gave better than a 98.5% of occurring fails to occur, it casts doubt on all the rest of your ideas. [/quote] As I have said before shitbreath, you are a disgrace and dishonor to yourself and any offspring that might have been unfortunate enough to spring forth from your loins. [/quote] Ad Hominem noted. Oh, how you have wounded me. [quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1221979:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTMxMDE1XzY4QjE5OUVB] There is nothing more dishonorable that a professional liar. You're a bit like a lawyer defending a guilty client who want's to murder humanity. [/quote] Ad Hominem noted. You're a little like a kid who thinks he has super-powers staring hard at someone he doesn't like convinced their brains will explode at any moment now. And yet they don't. See how pointless those kinds of lines are? Yet you use them so often and so fervently and so ineffectively. [quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1221979:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTMxMDE1XzY4QjE5OUVB] There is no person more worthy of eternal suffering. Justice is coming to us all. ARE YOU READY?. [/quote] Yes. But I am expecting justice will be in the form of you being utterly wrong on December 22nd, and the torrent of excuses you'll be using thereafter. You know that you'll be wrong, too, or you'd take me up on that wager you're too cowardly to accept. [/quote]
Look at this photograph, it's the lasco c2 image. notice the particles:
link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov
For the first time in 11 years, this NOAA space weather website is not responding:
link to www.n3kl.org
According to what we a re seeing on the lasco c2 image, this data is falsified:
link to www2.nict.go.jp
The pressure should be much higher!
Normally, the position of the sun would be apparent on this graphic , usually with a low flux reading during a quiet period:
link to www.swpc.noaa.gov
Again, I am absolutely positive that solar data and space weather data is being withheld and falsified, and looking at the lasso c2 image it is quite apparent there is an unusual event occurring and an intense outburst of radiation, a very severe x ray flare from a sunspot that is rotating into position to become noneffective within 5-7 days.
This turn of events does not bode well and I am absolutely certain after observing theses data spreads fro 12 years that the information is being falsified.
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Parents Stop Biometric Hand Scanner Program At Public Schools
Chick-Fil-A to remove butane, dyes, high fructose corn syrup by 2014 after meeting ‘Food Babe’
Is Humanity Declaring Checkmate On The New World Order?
United Nations Launches First Fleet of Surveillance Drones
Study predicts dementia cases worldwide will triple by 2050
Federal Government Assumes Control of Arizona Forests
A Cash-Strapped Europe's Latest Craze: Rented Clothes
Expert Testifies to Congress: Obama’s ‘Ignoring Laws’ Could Lead to Overthrow of Government
Introducing Designer Babies
UK police threaten Guardian editor with terrorism charges over Snowden leaks
Food poverty in UK has reached level of ‘public health emergency’, warn experts
Some NSA Opponents Want to 'Nullify' Surveillance With State Law
Obama Regime To Review Facial Recognition Technology
Over $100 In Tolls For Truckers Driving Into Manhattan From New Jersey
Obamacare Architect Harry Reid EXEMPTS Staffers From Obamacare
No Sex Please: Google’s Strange List of Banned Words
Bitcoin could ‘destroy the dollar’
They’re Going to Dump the Fukushima Radiation Into the Ocean
House Votes to Extend Gun Law Without New Provisions
Spooky Physics Phenomenon May Link Universe's Wormholes
Colored Plastic Doubles Solar Cell Power
$99 Kit Lets Kids Build Their Own Computers
TSA Expands Searches of Parked Cars at Airports
Deposit Confiscation Coming - Confirmed At ‘Future of Banking in Europe’ Conference
Boehner signs up for Obamacare, with government support
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd.
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2012 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.005s (5 queries)