Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 2,266 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 519,402
Pageviews Today: 941,003	Threads Today: 399	Posts Today: 6,153
08:33 AM

Back to Thread

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:Anonymous Coward 74444:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTc1NzE5X0FDQ0YwQzI2]
Ah, so you are still about!  Hope you are well.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 74444:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTU5ODI5X0JDQThGNDAw]
I will find it interesting to test your predictions, SG, after IDW/AA's likely fail on December 22nd.  It's a pity he hasn't been around, but c'est la vie.

33 days to go.  Things aren't looking to good for IDW/AA's predictions...
[/quote]

Unfortunately people are in a trance state and unable to see the most obvious of facts.

I believe this is the result of an ongoing continuous psychological war that is enabled by radio frequency brainwave control piggybacked on the cellular telephone network and through television.
[/quote]

I'd forgotten about the brainwave-control claim of yours.  Thankfully, it's still on the List. But, for now, it is irrelevant to testing your claims.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
Yes, they are managing to create what appears to be near seasonal temperatures but the tell tale sign that I am correct is the 10-15 degrees above normal temperatures in the arctic and sub arctic regions.
[/quote]

But that isn't what you claimed would happen.  And do 'they' have uber-powerful weather control devices, too?  Why didn't you mention that, oh, a *year* ago?

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
 There is no 'reservoir' of cold air that normally facilitates the manifestation of the season we call 'winter'. [b]There will be no winter[/b]. Localized snowstorms that melt off the next few days are not 'winter'.
[/quote]

I suppose we will see.  However, again, climate change and warming have been predicted by traditional, non-IDW science for decades.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
Yes, there is some refreezing of arctic ice, but it at the lowest level in recorded history and deceptive tactics are being used to make it appear there is more solid ice that actually exists.
[/quote]

You, of course, can cite evidence for this.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
The data we are given counts any area covered by are least 15% ice as frozen, as in the chart posted earlier..
[/quote]

You can, of course, cite evidence for this.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
The largest storm in recorded history just hit the northeast, the magnetosphere is so unstable that daily fluctuations of 100 nanotesla are becoming the norm at any given latitude, and contrary to a sophisticated propaganda campaign dedicated to making you believe all is normal, every prediction I made is coming to past.
[/quote]

Like that prediction you made, with your claimed 100% accuracy, that martial law would be enacted in 2004?

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
While the current solar maximum appears to be somewhat tame with few complex sunspots appearing as of yet, this will change.
[/quote]

We'll see what we see.  But, strangely, the predictions leading up to December you made yourself on this very thread don't seem to be fitting reality all that well.  How unusual.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
As I have repeatedly stated we are entering completely uncharted territory and predictions are hard to make with any great degree of accuracy,
[/quote]

Despite you repeatedly claiming 98.5% accuracy, without quantifying that in any way...

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
but one that I can make with certainty is that the current mass extinction will worsen, the intensity of weather systems and weather extremes will worsen ( the energy that powers the weather comes from the Sun) , and data will continue to be withheld.
[/quote]

How convenient for you.  I expect when there is winter in the Northeast, you'll say "they" are using their weather control devices just to make "you" look wrong.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
"They" are not going to tell you the direness of the situation but rest assured they have made their preparations.

"They" are setting up a situation which will pit the nuclear powers against each other in precise timing with when the global changes become so obvious that no one will deny it. It amazes me to see people here who are stating directly that my predictions have failed.
[/quote]

Strange.  When I look at your predictions, it isn't people I see failing.  Just you.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
While it is true that I have not been completely accurate ,
[/quote]

and are now a contender for the understatement of this very young decade...

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
there is no one in this world who has been more accurate and with the complex interactions of a multitude of totally new phenomenon it is simply not possible to predict with 100% accuracy ever contingency.
[/quote]

Yet, if you look at traditional physicists, chemists, biologists, astronomers, engineers, they all seem to predict their fields with fantastically more accuracy than you.  Strange, that.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
But I do think I have been correct on my main points,
[/quote]

You haven't.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
 unusual and unprecedented geological activity,
[/quote]

Please cite evidence supporting this claim.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
an increase in the effects of solar events on the planet,
[/quote]

Please cite evidence supporting this claim.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
 and rapidly changing and radical weather patterns.
[/quote]

Which traditional climatologists have been predicting for quite some time...

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
 The one thing that admittedly has taken me by surprise is the lack of complex sunspots and I have been off with my temperature predictions as a result. 
[/quote]

Among other things.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
Do not let your guard down because a few people have concentrated on the failure of a few predictions to manifest in precisely the way I said they would.
[/quote]

Yes.  Certainly pointing out your past failed claims and repeated incompetence in any number of different subjects you have claimed to master, your inability to cite supporting evidence, and your ego repeatedly overwhelming your judgement is no reason to doubt you *this* time.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
Remember, there is no history to look back to besides several mass extinctions and changes in atmospheric composition recorded in ice core samples that we know were directly related to solar activity and intentionally attributed to other causes.
[/quote]

You can, of course, cite evidence of this.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
"They" will coordinate a worldwide economic failure followed directly by an all out nuclear exchange participated in by all of the nuclear powers (which are all actually under the control of the 'monolithic worldwide conspiracy" Kennedy spoke of)  destroying the major cities and huge slices of the population when the magnetometer completely or nearly completely fails and the solar maximum peaks, probability, 100%.
[/quote]

And those who have watched you will know exactly what your 100% certainty on any subject is *really* worth.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
This will occur during the time frame I set forth throughout this thread. [b][i]The fact that the solar maximum has not been that impressive as of yet is not to be taken as a sign of future events.[/i][/b]
[/quote]

Again, how convenient.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
If you are wondering why I have not posted here recently the honest answer is twofold, I have been very busy preparing and the message has already gotten out to those who are still capable of complex intellectual thought patterns, which is about 1/2 of 1% of the total population who can see the 'whole picture'.
[/quote]

And you are tired of getting your ass handed to you by your supposed intellectual inferiors.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
The television program "doomsday preppers" proves that not a single one of these people preparing realize all of their separate reasons and fears are connected to each other.
[/quote]

And such a highbrow set of subjects!

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
I will not waste my time posting here any longer as there is nothing to gain at this point and it would have no productive result at this point.
[/quote]

Other than proving you inferior to your own tasks, yet again.  I, for one, think that's *quite* productive, honestly.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NTcyMTUxXzVGMjIwNTFC]
What amazes me is how effective the electronic and psychological mind control has been on such a large percentage of the population, all who sense something is very wrong as the water begins to boil in the pot, and so very very few of the frogs are sensing the increase in heat and jumping out other than into either a worst position or no real increase in chances of survival.
[/quote]

And what amazes me is how tenaciously one will hold onto an erroneous idea, despite reams of evidence to the contrary, and how many irrational and repeated logical fallacies one will cling to to protect one's ego.

I expect to be posting in 2013 on a functioning Internet, proving you wrong yet again.  The question, then, will be whether you have to courage to post, as well.

I suppose we'll see.
[/quote]

Original Message Look at this photograph, it's the lasco c2 image. notice the particles:
[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]

For the first time in 11 years, this NOAA space weather website is not responding:
[link to www.n3kl.org]

According to what we a re seeing on the lasco c2 image, this data is falsified:
[link to www2.nict.go.jp]

The pressure should be much higher!

Normally, the position of the sun would be apparent on this graphic , usually with a low flux reading during a quiet period:
[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

Again, I am absolutely positive that solar data and space weather data is being withheld and falsified, and looking at the lasso c2 image it is quite apparent there is an unusual event occurring and an intense outburst of radiation, a very severe x ray flare from a sunspot that is rotating into position to become noneffective within 5-7 days.

This turn of events does not bode well and I am absolutely certain after observing theses data spreads fro 12 years that the information is being falsified.

Pictures (click to insert)

News