Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 1,774 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 216,971
Pageviews Today: 435,461	Threads Today: 201	Posts Today: 3,570
03:57 AM

Back to Thread

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1240344:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NjUyMDg0XzY3NzBDNDIw]
[quote:old guard:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0NjQ3MTAxX0Q0QkYwOTEy]
Do these studies come from the Wasington Post?
Do you have any other studies that would collaberate with this?
Me thinks this is media manipulation.
Just my opinion.
[/quote]

Precisely. The damage from Sandy was over a huge geographic area and included areas that are literally the most expensive real estate per square foot in the country. Also, the damage from Sandy has not been accurately added up yet, this will not come for years later. Original damage estimates from Katrina were very very low compared to what we are hearing now, we won't know for sure until the insurance companies pay out on the damage or reveal their figures that resulted in their bankruptcy. My intuition tells me Sandy did three times the monetary damage of any storm in history due to the flooding over such a large area and the wind and water damage in areas with very high real estate values and expensive homes.

The deaths from Sandy were very low because the people had plenty of warning and didn't act like stupid rednecks in the south frequently do, which is 'stand their ground". The 6000 deaths in Galveston were the result of a total lack of warning, and I seriously doubt the damage estimates in Galveston ad Southern Florida given by the Washington post were even in the right paperbark. It is an attempt to downplay the damage of Sandy, for whatever reason. . Had the island been evacuated, only a hundred or so would have died if that. I do not believe the damage figures from Katrina are accurate and are inclusive of everything from the funding of Blackwater to the relocation of hundreds of thousands of people and th funding of welfare recipients in far off regions.. The areas that were destroyed were very poor niegborhoods, besides of course the coital casinos in MIssissippi.
[/quote]

Original Message Look at this photograph, it's the lasco c2 image. notice the particles:
[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]

For the first time in 11 years, this NOAA space weather website is not responding:
[link to www.n3kl.org]

According to what we a re seeing on the lasco c2 image, this data is falsified:
[link to www2.nict.go.jp]

The pressure should be much higher!

Normally, the position of the sun would be apparent on this graphic , usually with a low flux reading during a quiet period:
[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

Again, I am absolutely positive that solar data and space weather data is being withheld and falsified, and looking at the lasso c2 image it is quite apparent there is an unusual event occurring and an intense outburst of radiation, a very severe x ray flare from a sunspot that is rotating into position to become noneffective within 5-7 days.

This turn of events does not bode well and I am absolutely certain after observing theses data spreads fro 12 years that the information is being falsified.

Pictures (click to insert)

News