Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 2,090 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 483,998
Pageviews Today: 746,005	Threads Today: 296	Posts Today: 4,594
08:02 AM

Back to Thread

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:Anonymous Coward 74444:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0OTg5MzM3X0MxMEMwMzZE]
[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1282622:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0OTg3OTkyX0E2QzFFRDhE]

When did you do that, I must have missed it.
[/quote]

You didn't miss it.  You merely pretend you didn't write the things you wrote.

Thankfully, most of those threads are still here at GLP.  You just don't know how to look very well.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1282622:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0OTg3OTkyX0E2QzFFRDhE]
 I think everyone else did too.
[/quote]

Uh huh.  Stop attempting to speak for everyone else -- they can post just fine, if they wish.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1282622:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0OTg3OTkyX0E2QzFFRDhE]
As for your re posting [i]my[i/] claims, what I couldn't help but notice and I am sure everyone else agrees is that you show no proof of which claims originated with me and which you created yourself.[/i]
[/quote]

Really?  Yet I have repeatedly posted and reposted your very own quotes.  Honestly, I *wish* I had the imagination to come up with some of the humdingers you have made in the past.  As I have asked before: *precisely* which claims are you disavowing?  Be specific, now, and we can discuss it.

And you demanding proof once again redefines irony.  Just above I asked you several times for evidence supporting your most recent claims, and once again you have balked.

Surprising.

[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1282622:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzM0OTg3OTkyX0E2QzFFRDhE]
And where criminal acts are concerned like electronic stalking, the fault [i]does[/i] in fact lie with you. You have been repeatedly asked not to communicate with me in any way.
[/quote]

Then find another board, somewhere.  There are so many on the Internet.  But so long as you are posting here at GLP and acting in the typically rude, bully-like way that you do, I will continue to point out your missteps, mistakes, and repeated downright falsehoods.

It really is the very least I can do -- particularly so close to your 99.5% drop-dead certainty date, which should demonstrate aptly what your certainty is really worth.
[/quote]

Original Message Look at this photograph, it's the lasco c2 image. notice the particles:
[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]

For the first time in 11 years, this NOAA space weather website is not responding:
[link to www.n3kl.org]

According to what we a re seeing on the lasco c2 image, this data is falsified:
[link to www2.nict.go.jp]

The pressure should be much higher!

Normally, the position of the sun would be apparent on this graphic , usually with a low flux reading during a quiet period:
[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

Again, I am absolutely positive that solar data and space weather data is being withheld and falsified, and looking at the lasso c2 image it is quite apparent there is an unusual event occurring and an intense outburst of radiation, a very severe x ray flare from a sunspot that is rotating into position to become noneffective within 5-7 days.

This turn of events does not bode well and I am absolutely certain after observing theses data spreads fro 12 years that the information is being falsified.

Pictures (click to insert)

News