Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 2,053 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 116,861
Pageviews Today: 232,591	Threads Today: 109	Posts Today: 2,010
01:58 AM

Back to Thread

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:Anonymous Coward 2674622:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzI5MzcxNTExXzU1RDY0NTZF]
[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist 1124520:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzI5MzcxMzIxXzdBNzY2QTFG]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 2674622:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzI5MzY5ODA4X0M1MUQ1RTg3]
[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1191382:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzI5MzY3NzI4XzFDQTgwQzBC]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 1544751:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzI5MzY3NTUxXzI5QjFGNjA2]
[quote:Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1191382:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzI5MzY3MzI2X0ZDMTk4OUQw]
IT SUPPOSED TO PREDICT RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE CAUSED BY SOLAR RADIATION BUT IS AN EXCELLENT INDICATOR OF DANGEROUS SURFACE CONDITIONS... contrary TO WHAT YOU'VE READ IN YOUR OFFICIALLY APPROVED TEXTBOOK, THE ATMOSPHERE IS MUCH LESS EFFICIENT AT ABSORBING X RAYS THAN IT IS VISIBLE LIGHT, INFRARED, OR ULTRAVIOLET.,LOOK UP, CAN YOU SEE THE SUN DURING THE DAY? WHAT MAKES YOU THINK SOLAR X RAY FLARES WHICH AR E MUCH HIGHER IN ENERGY DO NOT PENETRATE TO THE SURFACE CAUSING HARMFUL AND EVEN DEADLY EFFECTS>? I'LL TELL YOU WHY BECAUSE TPTB DO NOT GNAT PEOPLE OBSERVING AND AVOIDING SOLAR RADIATION DANGERS, BECAUSE IT WOULD MEAN THE LOSS OF TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS. THE MAGNETOSPHERE AND THE EARTHS MAGNETIC FLUX HAVE NO EFFECT ON ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION, ONLY THE MASS OF THE ATMOSPHERE ATTENUATES IT AND THE ATMOSPHERE WAS SEVERELY EFFECTED DURING TH LAST SOLAR MAXIMUM.
f]FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES, THE OZONE LAYER IS A NON ISSUE NOW, WE MUST USE RADIATION BLOCKING SKIN CREAMS.
[/quote]

This is garbage.  You just make crap up and want everyone to say how great you are.  Not going to happen.  Learn some science.
[/quote]

Be specific, in this case very specific. Point out the falsehoods in my statement. You can't .All you have is dumbed down programing you call and education of about 12 years of public brainwashing and 2 years of phoenix university learning how to argue ineffectively and waste the time of important researchers.,education only comes with absorption of actual truth.
[/quote]

You mean besides everything?  The plots you tout show the amount of attenuatiuon of radio signals with frequency in the D layer, which is 50-90km, and not interference.

The atmosphere is transparent to visible light, that is why we can see the Sun in the day and the stars at night.  The absoprtion in the visible is extremely small.  The absorption is higher in the UV, x-ray, and infrared.

x-rays are absorbed high in the atmosphere.  It is a question of absoprtion cross section which is wavelength dependent.

The rest is just nonsense from someone is who very confused and it doesn't make any sense at all.
[/quote]

You are claiming I said something I didn't say, and I realize attenuation is affected by wavelength. The point is that not all x and gamma rays or cosmic rays for that matter are absorbed by the atmosphere and recent changes in the atmosphere have reduced this attenuation.ALL wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation from the Sun penetrate to the surface , and during severe x ray events the flux can be dangerously high. In some cases it can cause mass death scenarios in geographic location while the sun is directly overhead and penetrating less of the atmosphere, two of which I have logged correlating with two specific events. I also have and extensive archive of reports of radiation induced sicknesses occurring during sever x ray and particle storms.

And by the way, there is no such word as absoption
[/quote]

Nothing of what you just said is what you posted.  It is right there to see.  You said interference.  It isn't interference, it is attentuation.  You also said that visible is more easily absorbed than x-ray, UV, and infared.  That is simply not true.  ALL electromagnetic radiation does not make it to the surface.  What a silly statement.  x-ray, UV, and infrared are heavily attenuated.  Anectodatal statements are not evidence.  Besides, correlation does not imply causation.  It could be you causing people to be sick.  You make claims and people who don't know any better believe you and think they are sick or falsely attribute real symptoms.
[/quote]

Original Message Look at this photograph, it's the lasco c2 image. notice the particles:
[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]

For the first time in 11 years, this NOAA space weather website is not responding:
[link to www.n3kl.org]

According to what we a re seeing on the lasco c2 image, this data is falsified:
[link to www2.nict.go.jp]

The pressure should be much higher!

Normally, the position of the sun would be apparent on this graphic , usually with a low flux reading during a quiet period:
[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

Again, I am absolutely positive that solar data and space weather data is being withheld and falsified, and looking at the lasso c2 image it is quite apparent there is an unusual event occurring and an intense outburst of radiation, a very severe x ray flare from a sunspot that is rotating into position to become noneffective within 5-7 days.

This turn of events does not bode well and I am absolutely certain after observing theses data spreads fro 12 years that the information is being falsified.

Pictures (click to insert)

News