Users Online Now:
2,021
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
751,202
Pageviews Today:
999,403
Threads Today:
268
Posts Today:
4,052
08:39 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Halcyon Dayz, FCD:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMTY5MjI0XzNCNzlDMzdG] [quote:LD 12622466:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMTY3Mjk1XzRGNTU1RDEx] knowledge only becomes wisdom when it is shared .. [/quote] Frankly, I don't understand why he bothers. Why did you think you could jump in at the deep end without ever having been in water before? :book: ________________________________________________________________________________ [quote:Anonymous OP 8597527:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMTY4NDA5X0NCQ0ZDNjk3] [quote:Halcyon Dayz, FCD:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMTY3MTAzXzc1QjJGRDM0] Ah. That famous 'intuition' of yours. Completely dispels the need for solid verifiable facts and cold hard logic. [/quote] god, you are clueless... you are just parroting what you have been told has occurred by what you perceive to be an authority figure. [/quote] Says you. What is your evidence for that claim. See how you are caught in a circle of denial. You [i]have[/i] to believe that to be true, because without it your whole house of cards comes tumbling down. Now what is your explanation for that North Korean rocket scientist who will tell you exactly the same thing about how rockets work as would one from Alabamy? And a lot of that stuff you can experimentally verify [i]for yourself[/i]. Just join a rocket club. You have no clue of how subversive the scientific method is. It accepts no authority. Be it Pope or Emperor. It let's the facts speak. [quote:Anonymous OP 8597527:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMTY4NDA5X0NCQ0ZDNjk3] you can spout as many "solid verifiable facts" as you want. [/quote] And once again you claim that stuff people pull out of their arses has the same evidentiary weight as, you know, stuff you can check. [quote:Anonymous OP 8597527:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMTY4NDA5X0NCQ0ZDNjk3] claiming the scenes depicted on those Apollo videos are absolutely real is an [i]outrageous claim[/i] and based on faith, whether you want to admit it or not. [/quote] Since it is philosophically impossible to proof 100% that [i]anything[/i] is real I never made such a claim. I think they are genuine. With a extremely high degree of certainty. My assertion is that nobody has provided any evidence that they are not. And your gut feeling is NOT EVIDENCE. [quote:Anonymous OP 8597527:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMTY4NDA5X0NCQ0ZDNjk3] this claim is only taken seriously because it has a Nasa logo attached to it, [/quote] Sure. Whatever. Never mind the complete absence of evidence that they aren't genuine. And the shit load of evidence that they are. What's your obsession with pictures anyway? It's something conspiracists seem to have in common. MTV generation? YouTubeism? What about the terabytes of data of which existence you seem to be unaware off? [quote:Anonymous OP 8597527:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMTY4NDA5X0NCQ0ZDNjk3] and there are still enough fools in the world that think agencies like these are noble or trustworthy. [/quote] This is you projecting yourself on the world. And it [i]doesn't matter[/i] how 'noble or trustworthy' anyone is if their data can be verified. (This is the core of the problem with the [i]ad hominem[/i] attack, btw.) Don't trust. Verify. Can you do that? [quote:Anonymous OP 8597527:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMTY4NDA5X0NCQ0ZDNjk3] there are many logical problems with this claim, one being that we landed men safely on the moon 236,000 miles out and back, [/quote] WHY is that a logical problem? [quote:Anonymous OP 8597527:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMTY4NDA5X0NCQ0ZDNjk3] yet it is 2012 and we still do not have a single hi-resolution image of that landing site... [/quote] The landing site[b]s[/b]. Please don't tell me you are the lowest of the low among hoaxies and you were actually aware that there were more then one moon landing. This is incorrect. There are hundreds of really close-up pictures taken right on the spot. ;) LROC has imaged several of the sites with resolutions better then 25 cm/pixel. That actually beats any non-military satellite. (They could do that by getting closer. They could get closer because the Moon doesn't have a atmosphere.) [quote:Anonymous OP 8597527:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMTY4NDA5X0NCQ0ZDNjk3] Now you can parrot some pathetic reason why this is the case, and try and convince the weak-minded that you have provided a sufficient answer, but we all know it is complete bull. [/quote] But it isn't the case. It's one of those non-facts hoaxies tend to pull from a place the sun don't shine. [quote:Anonymous OP 8597527:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMTY4NDA5X0NCQ0ZDNjk3] ....nor have we sent a man any further than 400 miles, "coincidentally" before the VA belts [/quote] Pray tell, is there any reason to go higher if you do not have a destination? Pray tell, ever heard of the Southern Atlantic Anomaly? A part of the Inner Belt the ISS travels through on a regular basis. [quote:Anonymous OP 8597527:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMTY4NDA5X0NCQ0ZDNjk3] that some people like Anonymous Astrophysicist claim is impossible to send humans through safely with Apollo style equipment. [/quote] As always IDW did not provide any evidence for his claims. Frankly I think he's mentally ill but that wouldn't matter if he actually provided good evidence for his claims. So that's your 'evidence'? An unevidenced claim made by some anonymous person on the internet? Meanwhile every entity that owns property orbiting in the belts, we're talking about many billions of dollars worth, much of it private multinational corporations who own no allegiance to anything but the bottomline, will vouch that their radiation data matches NASA's. There is also no law against you firing sounding rockets into the thing. But you hoaxies will never put any serious money on proving any of your claims. Like how the chemtrailer refuse to take actual exhaust samples from jet liners. [quote:Anonymous OP 8597527:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMTY4NDA5X0NCQ0ZDNjk3] also, it is worth noting that none of you ever debated Anonymous Astrophysicst's arguments. you consistently teamed up to attack his character. [/quote] We have a history. IDW has never been right. He isn't right about Einstein having been a mumbling retard. He isn't right about photons actually being electrons. He isn't right about me being Jewish. He isn't right about the VABs being impassable with the CSM. [quote:Anonymous OP 8597527:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMTY4NDA5X0NCQ0ZDNjk3] i bet if he shows up again, you will slither away, or only poke your heads out to hurl some insults like you did before, which anyone can search back into previous pages and confirm. :book: [/quote] :lol: The only thing IDW ever gets here is a firm intellectual trashing. My problem with IDW isn't that he's crazy, or wrong. My problem with him is that he is a racist (pathologically so) and down right evil. :book: [/quote]
Original Message
This blows every other moon-hoax documentary out of the water.
Man went
230,000+ miles
(460,000+ miles round trip!) into space in the 1960's. Since then, no country in the world has "had the budget" to go more than
400
miles into space. Are you effing kidding me??!!
Apollo Zero
Did you ApolloTards realize that lasers can be reflected off the natural lunar surface?
Where is your proof that the lasers are actually hitting retro-reflectors and not just bouncing off the surface?
PIN THIS
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>