Users Online Now:
2,341
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,675,564
Pageviews Today:
2,454,090
Threads Today:
672
Posts Today:
13,844
08:00 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 12762990:MV8xNzkwNzAxXzMwMTcxNjkyX0NFMzMxNjAy] [quote: OP] god, you are clueless... you are just parroting what you have been told has occurred by what you perceive to be an authority figure. [/quote] It usual demonstration of your inability to discuss. [quote: OP] you can spout as many "solid verifiable facts" as you want. sooner or later you'e moving into the realm of total faith in believing what you see on those Apollo videos are real and not fake. claiming the scenes depicted on those Apollo videos are absolutely real is an [i]outrageous claim[/i] and based on faith, whether you want to admit it or not. this claim is only taken seriously because it has a Nasa logo attached to it, and there are still enough fools in the world that think agencies like these are noble or trustworthy. [/quote] The people (Astro, nomuse, Hal, Menow, etc.), that claim that NASA has not falsified its Moon videos, has offered to you arguments, and not faith, during 120 pages: their claims have appealed to science and rationales, and not to NASA's credibility (or to other authority principle). A review of the pages is enough to prove this. As a result of your inability to dismantle their arguments rationally, you accuse them of being victims of an irrational faith in NASA when you yourself have proven to be clinging to your beliefs without proof, evidence or reason, with ongoing appeals to your unproved intuitions and convictions. Let me recall that your basic argument (based in the so called 'moonhoaxer's logic') has always been: [i]"The NASA falsification is clear and all the people can see it. How? Don't you see it? Ah! this is because you are a shill! What? That there are third-party scientific evidences to prove the moon manned landing? Well, it doesn't matter because I don't believe them.... And, what the fuck! They, and you, and all who proves that the moon manned landing wasn't a hoax, are shills, because you are only science believers and worshipers of the NASA and the American Government!"[/i] Can you see how fallacious are you, boy? You are the 'hoax-believer', and not those who do not think like you. [quote: OP] there are many logical problems with this claim, one being that we landed men safely on the moon 236,000 miles out and back, yet it is 2012 and we still do not have a single hi-resolution image of that landing site... Now you can parrot some pathetic reason why this is the case, and try and convince the weak-minded that you have provided a sufficient answer, but we all know it is complete bull. [/quote] "All we know..." what do you know? You persist in empty phrases ('tag lines') that demonstrate that you do know nothing and you are simply an arrogant and obfuscated ignorant. And, as usual, you don't tell the true: of course there are high-resolution images: "Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiment Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group —the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution." (Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings#cite_note-LRO1-12) Examples: http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/index.php?/archives/137-Exploring-the-Apollo-17-Site.html http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/?archives/101-Apollo-11-Second-look.html http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/apollosites.html [quote:OP] ....nor have we sent a man any further than 400 miles, "coincidentally" before the VA belts that some people like Anonymous Astrophysicist claim is impossible to send humans through safely with Apollo style equipment. also, it is worth noting that none of you ever debated Anonymous Astrophysicst's arguments. you consistently teamed up to attack his character. yet as soon as he left, all you tools started ranting about your mystical "science and facts" powers. i bet if he shows up again, you will slither away, or only poke your heads out to hurl some insults like you did before, which anyone can search back into previous pages and confirm. :book: [/quote] The IDW's more normal assertions (those few that are not typical of a racist sociopath) are based in the ignorance of the basic science. The VA Belts vs Apollo missions issue is a outdated and boring topic. You, and IDW, will learn something about it on the following link: http://www.braeunig.us/apollo/apollo11-TLI.htm BTW, the first person who insulted (and that in the absence of arguments, continuously insulting) was you! :angryface: [/quote]
Original Message
This blows every other moon-hoax documentary out of the water.
Man went
230,000+ miles
(460,000+ miles round trip!) into space in the 1960's. Since then, no country in the world has "had the budget" to go more than
400
miles into space. Are you effing kidding me??!!
Apollo Zero
Did you ApolloTards realize that lasers can be reflected off the natural lunar surface?
Where is your proof that the lasers are actually hitting retro-reflectors and not just bouncing off the surface?
PIN THIS
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>